Fish harvesters are taking issue with DFO and are concerned that large trawlers are catching cod during a time set aside for spawning, all in the name of science.
Photo Credit: CBC

Anger, frustration over extended cod fishery

Independent inshore fishermen in Newfoundland are angry and frustrated at a Department of Fisheries decision to extend the cod fishing season until the end of March again this year.  The season was supposed to end March 01, prior to spawning season.

The inshore fishermen say that runs completely counter to conservation efforts in south coast Newfoundland in the zone designated as 3Ps, which includes a portion of the area known as the Grand Banks.

null
Cod fishing zones. Red line shows 200 nautical mile economic exclusion zone (EEZ) © Transportation Safety Board Canada

In 1992, the Canadian government put a moratorium on cod fishing around Newfoundland as the stocks had collapsed, almost disappearing completely.

There had been warnings of a collapse in the 1970’s after large bottom trawlers with radar beginning in the 1950’s had begun exploiting the deep-lying fish. This led to huge catch increases, but was wiping out the stock. Substantial by catch of other species, including cod prey-fish also harming cod survival.

null
Graph shows catches, showing massive catch increases starting int he 1950’s with the arrival of huge factory trawlers and fish finding radar technology. © Lamiot data: Millenium ecosystem assessment-wiki

International quotas were set, then  in 1977, Canada extended it’s exclusive fishing zone and also established national quotas, none of which reversed the collapse, leading to the moratorium.

null
Soviet factory trawler at St John’s circa 1980’s. Canada accused many foreign trawlers of overfishing, leading to the near total collapse of the cod fishery. © Maritime History Archive (Captain Harry Stone Collection, PF-001.1-M17a), Memorial University, St. J

For years there seemed no recovery of the cod stocks, and only in the past few years has there been evidence of a slow recovery.

A limited fishery was then allowed, while scientists analysed the catches to determine recovery rates.

null
Time series for the collapse of the Atlantic northwest cod stock, capture in million tonnes with country data apart from Canada. Based on data sourced from the FishStat database FAO. © epipelagic-wiki

In regard to the extension, Dave Coffin, Resource Manager at DFO told a CBC radio host that the closure seems not to coincide with spawning. “Last year we did allow fishing in March. There was concern raised by industry that our spawning closure didn’t acutally match when the fish were spawning….we got some feedback that fish were in good condition, that spawning was not taking place”, he said adding that in order to gather samples for scientific analysis, “we need fishing”.

null
Fish catches in millions of tons based on data sourced from the FishStat database FAO comparing Canada’s catch in blue, to the catch of all other nations in green, © epipelagic- wiki

However the small-boat inshore fisherman on the south coast of are accusing the (DFO) and the Fish, Food and Allied Workers Union (FFAW) of using the guise of science to allow large company-owned trawlers to continue to catch cod.

null
The Portuguese factory trawler Santa Mafalfa was escorted into St. John’s harbour after being arrested in 2005 for fishing inside Canada’s 200 mile limit in 2003 © CBC

Fisherman Alfred Fitzpatrick, who sits on the FFAW’s inshore council, said “We’re not long over a moratorium and we’re just starting to rebuild the stock. Spawning closures [were] put in as a measure to help rebuild that stock. Now just as it’s starting to get healthy … we’re going right back to the same things we [did] back in the 1970s, ’80s and early ’90s that caused part of the collapse.”
He adds, “If DFO wants science done, they’ve got boats to do the science with … wouldn’t it have been a lot easier to send a boat out there once a month instead of allowing a whole full-fledged fishery out there for the draggers? No, it’s all a ruse,” he said.

Fisherman Peter Leonard echoes the frustration, and says he believes the extended fishery came about as a result of pressure from large vessel interests.

“The FFAW shouldn’t be supporting any kind of fishery during spawning season let alone [vessels] using dragger technology,” Leonard said.  “Everybody is pretty disgusted with what’s taken place. Conservation is a joke, conservation is a point of convenience for whoever needs to use it.”

FFAW President Keith Sullivan said the union is also not happy with the final decision, “There was clear opposition to fishing on spawning aggregations of fish with mobile gear, otherwise known as draggers. Most people intuitively understand that if we’re interrupting any animals during mating or spawning, it’s definitely going to have an impact on stocks.”

The Union has asked for further meetings with DFO to discuss the repercussions, but no meetings have yet taken place.

With files from Jamie Baker-CBC

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Animals, Economy, Environment, International, Science and Technology

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

2 comments on “Anger, frustration over extended cod fishery
  1. jigger man says:

    we have for hundreds of years let the cod be harvested. now we want to go out and take them ourselves why all of a sudden. the price may be a reason, shame on anyone who thinks any different. how many of you really care? you now want to be part of something that was around forever in our time. why did you leave these shores. looking for money and a better way of life, well here we are. this was always here come home and stay. forget the mustang, come to the stingray.

  2. Ursula Wagner says:

    I am no fisherman, but common sense tells me the risk to get into the same
    situation as in the 70s and 80s must be still large and is surely not over.

    Not to understand why one doesn`t give the cod some more time to recover.
    It would be wise to listen to those who have the knowledge and can judge,
    and that are the fisherman in the region.

    They are so right to be frustrated and angry.