@*@ Header
A new private member's bill, if passed, would crack down hard on shark finning in Canada, a practice that sees between 26 million and 73 million shark fins traded annually every year. We see a beautiful white shark swimming in dark blue water. It holds a long, narrow object in its mouth. It is difficult to tell what it it.

A new private member's bill, if passed, would crack down hard on shark finning in Canada, a practice that sees between 26 million and 73 million shark fins traded annually every year.
Photo Credit: AP Photo / John Bazemore

Animal rights bill makes its way into the House of Commons

As noted before on this site, Canadian animal rights activists are a determined lot, driven by a desire to speak for beings lacking the power to advocate for themselves.

ope Bill C-246 would lead to the end of puppy mills. We see a close up of a shepherd-like dog's face behind the thin bars of a cage. We see the dog's right eye. It holds a look of terror.
Supporters hope Bill C-246 would lead to the end of puppy mills. © cbc. ca

Activists made their presence felt in last fall’s general election, going door-to-door for politicians they supported and pressing candidates to declare where they they stood on animal rights.

The stumping was part of a year that activists saw as something of a breakthrough, a year that that saw them–among other things–get an animal rights case to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Now, the battle is joined (not for the first time) in the House of Commons.

On Feb. 26, Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith introduced a private member’s bill, Bill C-246, the Modernizing Animal Protection Act.

Last week, a coalition of animal welfare groups, MPs and activists gathered at the Toronto Humane Society to celebrate the bill.

It has several aims, including closing existing loopholes for offences related to animal fighting.

Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith. We see him in a dark suit and red tied looking directly at the camera with his mouse just a touch agape. His blond hair is beginning to thin just a tad.
Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith. © cbc.ca

It would also allow for people to be charged when they have caused harm to an animal through negligence.

If passed, the bill would prohibit the practice of shark finning in Canadian waters and ban the import of shark fins not attached to the carcass. 

The practice of shark finning is already illegal in Canada, but Erskine-Smith says the coalition wants a ban on the import of shark fins from other jurisdictions because of the rampant poaching from marine sanctuaries, and “because Canadians generally recognize the brutal nature of the practice.”

As well, the bill would ban the sale of dog and cat fur and require that animal fur products be labeled with the country of origin and animal species.

This is not the first time an MP has introduced the issue of animal rights and animal protection in Parliament, but so far there has not been a lot of progress.

Over the past 25 years, bills introduced by the Liberals’ Anne McLellan and NDP’s Fin Donnelly failed to garner enought support to pass, but activists are hopeful this time will be different.

Politics, they maintain, remains the art of the possible.

The man who introduced Bill C-246, Nathaniel Erskine-Smith, spoke by phone with RCI on Monday from Toronto.

Listen
Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Animals, Economy, Education, Environment, Health, International, Lifestyle, Politics, Society

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

2 comments on “Animal rights bill makes its way into the House of Commons
  1. Richard Hilliard says:

    This bill is a disaster. How did you ever get elected? It will basically shut down sport fishing , hunting and sealing for the Iniut, Lab and NFLD. It will shut down about 20 % of our work force and tourism. Not to mention those fishing the Great lakes professionally. I don’t normally chastise those with good intentions, but this MP is brain dead. This has all the specs of shooting yourself in the foot.

  2. Ty Savoy says:

    So wonderful to see the Animal Rights Movement coming of age. The logic and reason behind the ideas are not something to be ignored any longer.

    ‘In fact if one person is unkind to an animal it is considered cruelty, but where a lot of people are unkind to a lot of animals, especially in the name of commerce, the cruelty is condoned and, once large sums of money are at stake, will be defended to the last by otherwise intelligent people.’

    Ruth Harrison, Animal Machines: The New Factory Farming Industry (2013)