Taxi driver Sajjad Ahmad attends the Toronto city council meeting on September 30, 2015, to protest Uber operating in Toronto.
Photo Credit: Reuters / Mark Blinch

Uber recommendations in Toronto

Uber is facing some changes in Toronto in an attempt to level the playing field between the so-called “ride-sharing” service and the city’s taxis. But many opponents are not satisfied that it does enough to benefit taxi drivers.

“this is creating an autonomous regime for Uber and a regime for everybody else”

Uber arrived in the Greater Toronto Area in 2012. Since then opposition and protests, some of them violent, have grown, in tandem with Uber customers. In 2014, Toronto Mayor John Tory said Uber was here to stay, and unlike the neighbouring city of Mississauga, which requested Uber halt operations until the regulations had been worked out, Uber continued to operate in Toronto. Councillors voted against seeking an injunction to stop Uber’s operations in February 2016.

Last week, Toronto’s 44-member city council released more than 100 recommendations at city hall. After all the work and consultation these proposed changes still amount to different sets of rules for Uber and for taxis.  But it is an attempt to ease what the report calls “the burden on taxis.”

Among these recommendations are changes such as taxi drivers would no longer be required to speak English, nor will they need to follow what was a mandatory 17-day training course; they won’t need to know how to perform CPR, and snow tires will no longer be required during the winter.

These may be breaks for taxi drivers but are they an improvement for Toronto’s citizens? Or is what some have described as a race to the bottom?

Jim Karygiannis, a member of parliament for 25 years, and now city councillor for the same area of Toronto, is outraged. He proudly wears the title of anti-Uber crusader.

“We are allowing Uber to get away with murder; no licensing, no marking, no plates — nothing,” he said, adding that the recommendations don’t go far enough to level the playing field with taxis,”  he said In an interview with CBC last Thursday. 

Listen

Why are you favouring Uber?

Some of the proposed new regulations for Uber include yearly inspections for its vehicles, background checks for Uber drivers and the creation of “vehicle-for-hire” licenses.

Karygiannis says, “Taxi drivers are very upset that we’re creating differentset of rules for Uber. We’re letting Uber monitor itself… their drivers have to pay only $10 (Cdn) to be licensed and the cab driver has to pay $200 bucks (Cdn).

Karygiannis has some support of city council. “Instead of levelling the playing field, we’ve dropped the floor and we’ve completely caved to Uber, and I’m shocked by it, frankly,” said Councillor Janet Davis, at city hall following the release of the report on April 7th, 2016.

She says Uber does not protect drivers or customers. “We know they surge price and we know they gouge drivers. I don’t understand why we wouldn’t put regulations on the worst aspects of this new kind of system,” Davis said.

“It says to me that Uber’s arrogance and complete disregard for city regulations to date has been successful,” she added.

Jim Karygiannis provides the appalling example of the surge pricing following the terrorist attack at the Lindt chocolate café in Sydney,   , Australia in December 2014. And many consumers closer to home got a different kind of Uber experience on New Year’s Eve.

Returning from a party in Montreal in the early hours of January 1st this year, two young women paid $630 (Cdn) for a trip that would have cost $83 (Cdn) in a regular cab.

Jim Karygiannis is a member of Toronto’s Licensing and Standards committee, and they begin debate on the recommendations this Thursday, April 14th, 2016.

Meanwhile, a majority of Canadians believe Uber should be subject to the same regulations as taxis, a poll in mid-February found.

Conducted by the Angus Reid Institute, the survey, published Friday February 12th  2016, indicated 63 per cent of Canadians feel the government should regulate Uber the same way it regulates taxis, while just 37 per cent said that Uber should be allowed to continue operating without those regulations.

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in Economy, Education, History, Immigration & Refuge, International, Lifestyle, Politics, Science and Technology, Society, Work & Labour

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

One comment on “Uber recommendations in Toronto
  1. Joseph says:

    This is all very interesting, and I will be curious to see where this goes. I definitely understand why taxi drivers are upset, but also appreciate the new business opportunity that Uber has presented to many people. Hopefully a resolution will develop that will appeal to both sides.