Debris left after the Pemberton B.C music festiveal in 2015. Less of a question of not knowing about recycling and consequences ,more a question of convenience to get people to think of the environment and thair actions

Debris left after the Pemberton B.C music festiveal in 2015. Less of a question of not knowing about recycling and consequences ,more a question of convenience to get people to think of the environment and thair actions
Photo Credit: Keith Harasymiw via CBC

Environmentally aware: a matter of mind..over mind

We just marked Earth Day on Friday, April 22, but are we really doing all that well in our efforts to be more responsible in trying to reduce our environmental footprint?

Apparently added education about the effects of our personal actions ( or inactions) on the environment is really not the best way to change habits.

Listen
Jiaying Zhao (PhD) is a jointly appointed assistant professor in the Department of Psychology and the Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability at the University of British Columbia
Jiaying Zhao (PhD) is a jointly appointed assistant professor in the Department of Psychology and the Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability at the University of British Columbia © UBC- supplied

Jiaying Zhao (PhD)  is a jointly appointed assistant professor in the Department of Psychology and the Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability at the University of British Columbia

Professor Zhao’s Behavioural Sustainability Lab  strives,“to use psychological insights to design behavioural solutions to solve sustainability challenges.”

She says studies show that mere education is not necessarily the best way to get people to do things that reduce their effect on the environment.  Nor necessarily she says are added taxes or fines going to achieve desired results.

While many believe teaching about benefits of being more environmentally conscious about one’s personal habits will then result in people modifying them, that isn’t necessarily the case.   She says people are already fairly knowledgeable about these things and  punitive measures like added environmental taxes are not always effective.

Professor Zhao says recent research from her lab shows simple convenience may get a lot more results,

Are people just lazy? Well , yes she says, making things more convenient gets results.  In a University of British Columbia article she says that two recent studies from her lab show that convenience improves recycling and composting rates by over 60 per cent in multi-family residential buildings, and real-time visual feedback reduces water consumption by over 30 per cent.  The lab findings suggested that by minimizing the distance between the recycling station and the suites in an apartment building, people were more inclined to recycle and compost. When it comes to water use, real-time monitoring systems that occupants could see can help encourage water conservation.

Not only people but some businesses need to improve practices. Late last year CBC Marketplace found several coffee shops material from in-store recycling bins ended up instead in garbage headed to landfills
Not only people but some businesses need to improve practices. Late last year CBC Marketplace found several coffee shops material from in-store recycling bins ended up instead in garbage headed to landfills © CBC Marketplace

 Making the environment alternative as convenient and/or as inexpensive as the non-environmental option will likely achieve similar results. This could be for example lowering the cost to consumers for public transit, and increasing the frequency so wait times are lessened, would likely get many more people out of the cars.

She also notes that meat production has a very large environmental cost. She says simply reducing slightly the amount of meat products eaten would also have a huge benefit for the environment.

Canada’s Parliamentary Budget Officer recently stated that anada’s commitment to reducing greenhouse gases by 30 per cent below 2005 levels could cost the public $600 to $1900 in their annual income by 2030.

This should says needn’t be so at all, saying there need not be a trade-off or competition between economic benefit and sustainability.  We can design for sustainability in the first place and with policies  that make environmental actions more convenient.

Parliamentary Budget Office- report on Greenhouse Gas emissions

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Economy, Environment, Lifestyle, Society

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*