In this undated photo provided by the International Boreal Conservation Campaign, the Boreal Forest is seen in central Quebec.

In this undated photo provided by the International Boreal Conservation Campaign, the Boreal Forest is seen in central Quebec.
Photo Credit: Matt Medler

Greenpeace says won’t bow to Resolute’s ‘bullying’

Share

A multimillion-dollar lawsuit by forestry giant Resolute Forest Products Inc. will not deter it from continuing its mission of “investigating, exposing and confronting environmental abuse by corporations,” Greenpeace said on Friday.

“Our work to create a green and peaceful world will continue, and we will not back down in the face of intimidation and bullying,” Annie Leonard, Greenpeace USA executive director, said in emailed statement.

The Montreal-based newsprint producer took its war with Greenpeace over logging practices in the boreal forests of Quebec and Ontario to a new level this week when it filed a lawsuit against the environmental NGO and a number of affiliated groups in U.S. federal court using legislation designed to fight organized crime.

In an unusual twist, Resolute has filed its lawsuit in Georgia under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).

The lawsuit also alleges defamation, tortuous interference and trademark claims, said Michael Bowe, a New York-based lawyer representing Resolute in this lawsuit.

(click to listen to the interview with Michael Bowe)

Listen

“Resolute has been for the last several years targeted in a campaign where it was accused of destroying the boreal forest, endangering its species and impairing the forest’s ability to mitigate climate change,” Bowe said. “And quite frankly those claims are absolutely absurd.”

‘Global fraud’

Calling Greenpeace a “global fraud,” the paper-maker said the environmental group has been waging a “smear campaign” that has forced many of its clients, including such retail giants as BestBuy, to switch to other suppliers.

“Greenpeace’s “Resolute: Forest Destroyer” campaign is malicious, false, misleading, and without any reasonable factual basis in numerous respects,” said Resolute’s strongly worded preliminary statement, which also accuses Greenpeace of fabricating evidence to support its campaign against the forestry giant.

“Maximizing donations, not saving the environment, is Greenpeace’s true objective.”

 Members of Greenpeace protest in front of the cross atop Mount Royal in Montreal early Tuesday morning, March 18, 2014 to bring attention to boreal forest logging.
Members of Greenpeace protest in front of the cross atop Mount Royal in Montreal early Tuesday morning, March 18, 2014 to bring attention to boreal forest logging. © PC/Peter Mccabe
‘A malicious public relations campaign’

Greenpeace shot back, saying Resolute has tried for years to silence critics of its environmental practices with “threats, defamatory attacks, and baseless lawsuits.”

“Instead of focusing on real solutions for forests, communities and its business, Resolute is once again wasting resources on a case with no merit,” said Leonard, who is also named in the lawsuit. “Grotesquely misstating our mission and attacking our credibility with a frivolous lawsuit and a malicious public relations campaign will get Resolute nowhere.”

This is not Resolute’s first legal attack against Greenpeace.

In May 2013, it filed a $7-million suit in the Ontario Superior Court against the group and two of its activists for an allegedly false and misleading report about the company’s logging practices in Ontario and Quebec.

In the ongoing suit, Resolute alleges Greenpeace has damaged the company’s “business, goodwill and reputation.”

Share
Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in Environment

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

3 comments on “Greenpeace says won’t bow to Resolute’s ‘bullying’
  1. Rene Albert says:

    Greenpeace is a “Has been”, and regularly uses intimidation, threats, fear and bullying.

    Their main reason for being is currently driven by their need to raise money, and they will do anything in order to maintain public financial support. Fortunately, their credibility has waned considerably in recent years. In short, Greenpeace is run by a group of losers, idiots and fanatics, and they now exist purely for capitalistic reasons…

    While this is going on, our governments at both Federal and Provincial levels who are supposed to be in charge of the environment just sit there doing nothing to keep Greenpeace in check…

    Fortunately, Resolute Forest Products is taking Greenpeace to task over their misguided actions, and I fully support them!

  2. Phil Morgan says:

    Greenpeace is a fraud.
    Go to their web site the first thing you see is a request for money.
    You can even leave them money when you die in the form of an annuity.
    I have seen a photo, were they say Resolute has cleared cut.
    The photo is not true, I live near the area, the damage was caused by a forest
    fire a year before. So with weather a year later the area looks like clear cut

  3. Good job Greenpeace keep up the pressure Happy Green Day 2016