In 2006, Pluto was declared not a real planet but a dwarf planet.

In 2006, Pluto was declared not a real planet but a dwarf planet.
Photo Credit: NASA/JHUAPL/SwRI via AP

Some scientists seek to revive Pluto’s status as a planet

Share

In 2006, Pluto lost its status as a planet and now some NASA scientists want to redefine the term “planet” so that Pluto would again be considered to be one. The debate over this is fraught.

Artists’ renditions of the planets in our solar system no longer include Pluto.
Artists’ renditions of the planets in our solar system no longer include Pluto. © CBC
Listen

‘A can of worms’

“This has been a can of worms really that’s been opened up and (there is) bad blood there between some scientists because when the voting took place back in 2006, many of the leading scientists weren’t even involved in the vote,” says Andrew Fazekas, the astronomy columnist with National Geographic.

The decision was made at a meeting of the International Astronomical Union, but many planetary scientists were not attendance.

Now, leading the charge to redefine what is a planet are scientists who study Pluto, who may be concerned that if Pluto is not considered a planet, it garners less interest and less funding for, says Fazekas.

Modern telescopes like this one at Oukaimeden Observatory in Morocco are much more advanced and clearly show Pluto is not as big as was thought and it is not alone.
Modern telescopes like this one at Oukaimeden Observatory in Morocco are much more advanced and clearly show Pluto is not as big as was thought and it is not alone. © Mosa’ab Elshamy/AP Photo

Pluto not as large as originally thought

Pluto was originally discovered 1930. It appeared to be very large and was declared a planet. “Technology was vastly different at that point and Pluto was thought to be as big as Jupiter…and alone in the outer fringes of the solar system,” he says. “Now we know that Pluto is definitely not alone. There is many of its kind around there—probably tens of thousands.”

Pluto is not a ‘cosmic bully’

The current definition of a planet is a sphere that has gravitational dominance or is a sort of bully that absorbs or ejects other objects that get too close. If that definition were to change it might include Pluto but also over a hundred new bodies that could fit the description including Earth’s own moon. That could cause confusion.

The matter will be debated at the upcoming Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Houston, but Fazekas does not think there will be much headway made in changing the current definition of a planet or changing the status of Pluto as a dwarf planet.

However, he adds, it is interesting to see science at work.

Share
Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Internet, Science and Technology

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*