A parked car in flood waters in the Gatineau, Que., area. A new report says preserving wetlands can help reduce the costs of floods. (Ashley Burke/CBC News

A parked car in flood waters in the Gatineau, Quebec area. A new report says preserving wetlands can help reduce the costs of floods substantially.
Photo Credit: Ashley Burke/CBC News

Putting a dollar value on wetlands

Scientists and environmentalists have long known that wetlands (marshes, bogs) mitigate climate extremes.

They absorb water  when there’s excess rain, and retain and release water when there’s drought.  Wetlands are something like a weather “shock absorber”.

Knowing that however hasn’t helped in their preservation from development.

A new study seeks to change attitudes towards wetlands, and help in their preservation

Blair Feltmate (PhD)  is head of the Intact Centre on Climate Adaptation at the University of Waterloo in Ontario.

Listen
Blair Feltmate (PhD) University of Waterloo, Intact Centre on Climate Adaptation
Blair Feltmate (PhD) University of Waterloo, Intact Centre on Climate Adaptation © U Waterloo

The study looked at at rural/agricultural situations and urban situations and compared cost data of flooding with the presence of wetlands and without.

It was prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry and called, “When the Big Storms Hit- The Role of Wetlands to limit Rural and Urban Flood Damage”.

The researchers found that the increase in damage costs in a rural situation without the wetlands in their natural state was in the order of around 28 per cent, and in an urban situation, flooding costs increased by 38 per cent.

A ’Class 3’ or seasonal wetland is defined as one that is flooded until about the end of June every summer. Wetlands absorb excess water in heavy rain and snow, and release it slowly in times of drought..kie a weater shock absorber.
A ’Class 3’ or seasonal wetland is defined as one that is flooded until about the end of June every summer. Wetlands absorb excess water in heavy rain and snow, and release it slowly in times of drought..kind of like a weather “shock absorber”. © Ducks Unlimited)

The report goes on to say that if the wetlands had been replaced by impervious surfaces like roads, parking lots, and buildings the potential flood damage figure would be much higher: “Accordingly, the additive value of wetlands to reduce flood damage, as profiled in this report, is conservative”.

Feltmate also notes that the climate is changing, and once rare flood anomalies are now much more common, noting that we can no longer rely on past weather tendencies to determine weather conditions in the present and future.

This *field* near Ottawa looks dry but is actually a soggy peat bog. In case of heavy rain, it can absorb a vast amound of water and prevent or reduce flood damage to nearby crops or buuildings and infrastructure.
This *field* near Ottawa looks dry but is actually a soggy peat bog. In case of heavy rain, it can absorb a vast amound of water and prevent or reduce flood damage to nearby crops or buildings and infrastructure. © lickr / CJuneau-via CBC

He also points out as an example of wetland loss that in the past 100 years or so in the highly populated region of southern Ontario, about 75 per cent of the wetlands have been drained and either converted to agriculture, or built over.  Another report from Manitoba indicated that about 70 per cent of historic wetlands have been lost in the southern part of that province, with 90 per cent in the Red River area.

Wetlands continue to be drained at an average rate of about 3.6 hectares a day in that province.

An American bittern eats a barred tiger salamander in a duckweed and algae-covered marsh in southwestern Manitoba. Wetlands are also a critical habitat for a wide variety of wildlife.
An American bittern eats a barred tiger salamander in a duckweed and algae-covered marsh in southwestern Manitoba. Wetlands are also a critical habitat for a wide variety of wildlife. © Bryce Hoye/CBC

Professor Feltmate says the report which for the first time assigns a cost figure to wetlands may help motivate politicians and other decision-makers towards conservation.

In the summary conclusion the report says, “maintaining wetlands in their natural state offers a broadly-applicable and cost-effective means to reduce the financially and socially pervasive impacts of flooding that are increasingly affecting all Canadians.”

additional information

Tagged with: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Economy, Environment, International, Science and Technology

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

One comment on “Putting a dollar value on wetlands
  1. Rene Albert says:

    With all those civil servants Canadians pay for at the Federal and Provincial levels, you would think our governments had already figured that out and taken action…and they keep trying to tell citizens what to do.

    Geeeezzzz!