Language-disabled student begs court for assistance

Share

Charged with a criminal offence, a stroke survivor wondered how he could plead his innocence in court. (M-C Simard/RCI)

Police banged on Matthew’s (*a pseudonym) door one Saturday morning in October 2015 and demanded his identification. He did not understand why. “I was very confused. The police never said exactly what they were charging me with.” Matthew faced having to go to court and testify with a language disability.

Videos by Marie-Claude Simard/RCI

Stroke caused paralysis, aphasia

Matthew had had a stroke 11 years before at the age of 20. This brain aneurysm left him with paralysis on his dominant, right side and with a language impairment called aphasia. Aphasia can make it difficult to speak and to understand. “It can have a big impact on every day life… and can have devastating effects,” says Guylaine Le Dorze, a renowned expert on aphasia and professor at the University of Montreal.

Criminal offence cited

Two officers came into Matthew’s apartment and began to question him. He asked for a lawyer. The officers handcuffed him with some difficulty because  his right hand is twisted and very stiff. They took him to hospital for evaluation.  The presiding doctor found him to be normal. Matthew made his way home in the rain and was left with an order to appear in court and the name of the alleged criminal offence.

At the time, Matthew was pursuing a second university degree on very little income and he realized he would need a lawyer.

After his stroke, Matthew obtained a bachelor of science in math and physics and another in engineering. (M-C Simard/RCI)

‘Paralyzed all of a sudden’

More than a decade earlier, in June 2003, Matthew was in the basement of a university building when the stroke felled him. It was three o’clock in the morning and he was alone and not feeling well. Suddenly, his right side was completely paralysed. He went to an elevator to try to get to a place where someone might find him, but his vision blurred and he could not read the symbols on the panel. Before he could trigger the fire alarm, he lost consciousness. A guard found him about ten minutes later and he was rushed to hospital. Matthew describes what happened and how he woke up unable to speak.

Matthew was in a coma for some time and had zero speech when he finally came to. As he got better, he had therapy to recover as much language ability as possible, and to learn to write and do tasks with only his left hand.

Matthew learned to peel an orange with only his left, non-dominant hand. (Marie-Claude Simard/RCI)

Matthew persisted and succeeded in completing his bachelor’s degree in math and physics. He went on to study engineering and was mid-program when police arrested him and he faced a criminal trial.

How to testify?

Matthew applied for free legal aid which is provided by his provincial government to people with living well below the poverty line. He was very worried about having to testify: “For someone like me it really is a problem because…with language difficulties brought on by a stroke it’s very difficult.”

Prof. Le Dorze says people with aphasia might have difficulty understanding questions, giving answers and may even mix up words. “People who have aphasia sometimes say another word instead of the one that they wanted to…” in court, it would make a big difference.”

Matthew asked the legal aid lawyer if he could write his answers in court and she said no. She also did not think the court would offer any other accommodation. Another lawyer who offered to help Matthew told him that was not right and she asked the court to provide him with the services of a speech language pathologist to help him when he testified. The case was eventually taken on by a leading law firm specializing in human and constitutional rights, Grey Casgrain.

Fair trial: A charter right

The Canadian Constitution guarantees the right to a fair trial. (www.justice.gc.ca)

Lawyer Debbie Mankovitz argued that it was Matthew’s constitutional right to have help to testify in court based on both the (province of) Quebec and Canadian Charters of Rights and Freedoms. “You have a right to clearly understand what’s happening and to be able to express yourself to the court…If your first language is not English or French you’re entitled to a translator. And if you are deaf you are entitled to a sign-language interpreter. So, what we were arguing was that if you have speech and language difficulties you should be entitled to a communication intermediary to assist you.”

Speaking slowly ‘not enough’

There were several delays in this case, several court appearances, several different prosecutors and several different judges. One of them asked whether the court officials could not simply speak more slowly and give Matthew plenty of time to reply. Prof. Le Dorze says that would helpful, in fact necessary, but that it would not be enough. A speech language pathologist would ensure that the person with aphasia understands what’s being said and has techniques to help the person choose the words they want to say. “So, Matthew wouldn’t have had enough with just time and a slow speech,” says Le Dorze. “No, that wouldn’t have been enough.”

Court repeatedly failed to provide assistance

Lawyer Mankovitz repeatedly asked for the right to have a communication interpreter for Matthew.  There were at least four administrative hearings on how the trial would proceed.The prosecutors did not contest the request for a speech language pathologist for him. And the judges asked that one be provided. But every time they went back to court, there was no speech language, only an English-French translator.

Mankovitz explains: “the administrative coordinator of the court house was under the impression that the service couldn’t be found—there was no list of professionals who would provide the service and they were not willing to undertake to find somebody to provide the service. So, they thought that the defendant should find someone and should pay for that person himself.”

‘My freedom, my life’ at stake

As a result, Matthew would be very disadvantaged, said Mankovitz. “That left him without any kind of support to be able to communicate with the court at his trial…In a criminal trial you can imagine the stakes are high. The stigma and punishment that come with a conviction are serious. And so, it left him very vulnerable.”

Matthew saw the risks in even starker terms. When asked what was at stake he said: “My freedom, basically my life” and as to how it would have affected his career, he said: “I would have been dead…I couldn’t have…I would have gone onto the streets and died.”

A human rights issue

Mankovitz asked the court for a stay of proceedings because the court’s failure to provide communications assistance denied his right to a fair trial. But, in the end the crown presented no evidence against Matthew and he was acquitted. Had the court finally provided assistance, that could have set a precedent and helped others in a similar situation. “It means the issue is unresolved,” said Mankovitz. “It means that there’s a serious access to justice issue that needs to be addressed in Quebec…Absolutely it’s a human rights issue.”

As for Matthew he was relieved for himself but disappointed there would be no change in the judicial system. As he put it, even though this issue affects a small segment of the population, “the system is still not fair for everyone.”

There is an organization in the province of Ontario that lobbies the judiciary on this issue. Communication Disabilities Access Canada  has trained and created a roster of communication intermediaries to appear in court to help people with communication disabilities testify in court. Some Ontario courts have hired and paid for them. But efforts continue to ensure this becomes standard practice.

Debbie Mankovitz plans to raise the issue with the association of lawyers in Quebec province. She wants a roster of communication intermediaries to be created and for the courts to provide and pay for their services when people with language disabilities have to testify. This could include people with impairments because of degenerative illnesses, autism, cancer or other conditions.

A job opportunity lost

From beginning to end, Matthew’s court case took more than two years. During that time, he was offered a job which he had to decline because of the pending criminal charge. Once he was acquitted, he completed his bachelor’s degree in software engineering and was accepted into his province’s Order of Engineers. He would like to study for a master’s degree in business analytics if he can find the money to finance it.

At the same time, Matthew participates in many university and public activities involving science, sports, culture and entertainment. He has volunteered to help international students settle in, to walk students safely across campus at night and to help fellow students with computer difficulties. Even more remarkable, he smiles a lot.

Matthew, ever smiling. (Marie-Claude Simard/RCI)

*Matthew did not want us to use his real name because no matter the outcome of his trial, just being charged with a criminal offence can make it harder to get a job.

According to the non-profit group Heart & Stroke 2017 report, there are 62,000 strokes in Canada each year and stroke in younger people is rising at a faster rate than in older adults. About 405,000 Canadians are living with the effects of stroke.

First published on May 26th 2018

Share
Tagged with: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Society
@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

6 comments on “Language-disabled student begs court for assistance
  1. Well, In that case, we are unable to say anything just want to say that this is a surely alarming scene for someone who has any kind of disability and does not have such resources to get the desired education or any other problems, So this one gives negative impact on lots of other things as well.

  2. C. S. Jessop says:

    I viewed the piece twice and found it devastating. If the accused had had a less tenacious team of helpers and professionals championing his cause, he would have slipped through the cracks and his life been in ruins. There appears to be no justice for people who might not be able navigate the legal system on their own.

    • I agree, C.S. Jessop. There are many people who cannot access police, legal and justice services because they do not have the communication supports they need. Matthew had people around him who tried their best to get him the assistance he needed – and even that didn’t work. The justice system should set the bar for equal access to services yet, it is failing over half a million Canadians who have speech, language and communication disabilities.

      Thank you, Matthew for sharing your story and let’s keep advocating for communication intermediary services across Canada.

  3. Shelley Deegan says:

    As a Speech-Language Pathologist working in the field of Augmentative and Alternative Communication I have followed CDAC’s many projects. Access to Legal and Justice Services has been a long standing project of CDAC. CDAC has been working to establish communication intermediary services for many years as part of this project. There is a very useful report which provides a legal framework for using intermediaries at:

    http://www.access-to-justice.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Communication_Intermediaries_In_Justice_Services_DIGITAL_14-1.pdf

    This report can be used to help judges understand why communication intermediary services are required.

  4. Thank you for this excellent article which highlights the need for communication intermediary services in all police, legal and justice situations. Communication Disabilities Access Canada (CDAC) which is mentioned in the article is not an Ontario program – it is a national non-profit organization that provides specialized training to Speech-Language Pathologists across Canada to work as Communication intermediaries Ⓒ in these situations. CDAC has a national database of 250 communication intermediaries (some in Quebec) that police, legal and justice organizations can use to search for and engage a trained intermediary to facilitate a person with a communication disability. We also have many resources about communication intermediaries on our website including a code of ethics and practice as an intermediary works in a different way than a clinically based Speech-Language Pathologist and requires additional training and guidelines to safeguard a person’s testimony in court. You can get information about Communication Intermediaries, their role, the training we provide and their code of practice at http://www.access-to-justice.org/. You can find a communication intermediary on our national database at http://www.cdacanada.com/communication-assistance-database/ For more information, email CDAC at admin@cdacanada.com

  5. Peter Ashcroft says:

    This was an alarming account.