U.S. Secretary for Defense Jim Mattis shakes hands with Canadian Defense Minister Harjit Singh Sajjan prior to a meeting on the sidelines of a NATO defense ministers meeting at NATO headquarters in Brussels, Belgium November 9, 2017. (Virginia Mayo/REUTERS/Pool)

Canada to host meeting of anti-ISIS coalition

Share

Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan and his U.S. counterpart Secretary of Defense James Mattis will host on Thursday a meeting of 13 members of the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS in Ottawa, according to Canadian and U.S. officials.

This meeting will follow up on the previous discussions in Brussels in June and “will focus on the Coalition’s continued efforts to counter the ISIS threat, take stock of recent progress and discuss the tasks and challenges ahead,” Byrne Furlong, Sajjan’s press secretary, said in a terse email statement.

While under Operation IMPACT Canada has about 850 of troops stationed in the Middle East, including members of the Canadian Special Operations Forces Command in a “train and assist” capacity in Iraq, no Canadian troops are involved in the fighting to capture the last ISIS stronghold of Hajin in eastern Syria.

A favour to the Pentagon

U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis (L) welcomes Canada’s Minister of National Defense Harjit Sajjan at the Pentagon in Washington, U.S., February 6, 2017. (Yuri Gripas/REUTERS)

University of Waterloo political science professor Bessma Momani, who specializes in the Middle East, said one of the reasons for holding the meeting in Ottawa has to do with internal U.S. politics and with the desire not to allow the Trump administration to “hijack” the issue and politicise it.

Sajjan has been asked in the past to host such meetings because Canada provides a venue where issues of interest to the Pentagon such as peacekeeping can be discussed without being unduly politicized by the administration, Momani said.

And the situation in Syria requires some deft balancing on the part of the Pentagon.

The fight against ISIS is the only way the Pentagon has to remain in Syria without seeking what’s called an Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) from Congress. The AUMF is the legislative authorization the executive needs to wage wars.

Because ISIS was considered an offspring of al-Qaeda, the U.S. government has been using the 2001 AUMF, which authorizes the president “to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.”

Under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, the 2001 AUMF was used to justify the deployment of U.S. forces to Afghanistan, the Philippines, Georgia, Yemen, Djibouti, Kenya, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Iraq, and Somalia, according to reports by Business Insider.

“They never went back to Congress to get a new AUMF,” Momani said.

But now that the fight against ISIS in Syria is almost over, President Donald Trump wants to bring the troops home.

Staying in Syria to check Iranian expansion

US-backed forces are pictured near the village of Susah in the eastern province of Deir ez-Zor, near the Syrian border with Iraq on September 13, 2018. – US-backed fighters are fighting in Deir ez-Zor to oust Islamic State jihadists from the town of Hajin on the east bank of the Euphrates, the most significant remnant of the sprawling “caliphate” the jihadists once controlled spanning Syria and Iraq. (AFP/Getty Images)

However, Mattis and some elements in the Pentagon want to stay in Syria because they want to prevent Iranian expansion into Syria and into Lebanon, Momani said.

“But… they can’t say, ‘We’re there to prevent Iranian expansion,’ because the AUMF is not about that,” Momani said. “The AUMF is about fighting ISIS.”

With ISIS reduced to a small pocket in Hajin, on the eastern bank of the Euphrates River in the Deir ez-Zor governorate in eastern Syria, the U.S. is about to run out of even that excuse.

“In many ways, I don’t think it’s in the U.S. interest to say they [ISIS] are completely gone,” Momani said.

The caliphate’s last stronghold

Members of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) gather next to a building in the village of Susah in the eastern province of Deir ez-Zor, near the Syrian border with Iraq on September 13, 2018. – US-backed fighters are fighting in Deir ez-Zor to oust Islamic State jihadists from the town of Hajin on the east bank of the Euphrates, the most significant remnant of the sprawling “caliphate” the jihadists once controlled spanning Syria and Iraq. (Delil Souleiman / AFP/Getty Images)

Fierce clashes have been taking place for weeks around Hajin with the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) trying to capture the last remaining ISIS stronghold.

The fighting has resulted in hundreds of civilian casualties, according to war monitoring group Airwars.

The independent investigative group which tracks civilian casualties in Iraq and Syria, estimates that at least 98 civilians likely died in 16 separate events in and around Hajjin in October alone – the worst reported non-combatant fatalities from U.S.-led actions since the battle for Raqqa.

A significant increase in artillery and air strikes by U.S., French, British and Dutch members of the international military alliance fighting ISIS is to blame, Airwars said.

“While the U.S.-led Coalition has so far conceded just seven deaths from Operation Roundup – the campaign it began in May to drive ISIS from its last Syrian stronghold – the reality on the ground appears very different,” said in a statement Chris Woods, director of Airwars.

“More than 1,100 civilian deaths have locally been alleged so far, and Airwars presently believes, based on available reports, that at least 420 non-combatant deaths from coalition actions around Hajin do appear likely to date.”

Far more care must be taken to protect civilians by U.S., Dutch, French, British and Iraqi forces and their SDF ground allies, the group said.

For the first time since the Kremlin intervened in the Syrian civil war in September 2015, there were no reported civilian casualties from Russian actions in Syria in October, the report said.

“With casualties from Assad government forces and non-state actors including ISIS also sharply down, it appears the U.S.-led alliance was responsible for more civilian harm in Syria in October than any other belligerent,” Woods said.

Share
Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in International, Politics

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*