What an ice-free Arctic really means, and why it matters so much

Arctic ice, long a regulator of our planet’s temperature, is melting as more and more CO2 is being emitted. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)
At Earth’s poles, ice and snow is disappearing — and it’s transforming our planet.

Snow and ice have long played a vital role in moderating Earth’s climate. The white surfaces reflect the sun’s radiation, which in turn helps maintain a comfortable temperature for life on the planet.

But with a warming planet, that ice melts or thins, exposing the dark water below, which absorbs that radiation. So each year the global temperature rises, melting more ice and snow. It’s a positive feedback loop: warming causes ice melt, ice melt causes warming. And that process — also called Arctic amplification — leads to what we are observing now, which is a rapidly changing climate.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, released Wednesday, suggests that we could see an ice-free Arctic once every 100 years if we limit warming to 1.5 C above pre-industrial levels. If we warm to 2 C, that would increase to once every three years.

Could all that snow and ice at the poles eventually disappear altogether?

It’s complicated.

The potential for an ice-free Arctic has been bandied about for decades, but it’s important to know what scientists mean by “ice-free.”

“Usually when we talk about ice-free, it’s virtually ice-free,” said Jennifer Francis, senior scientist at Woods Hole Research Center in Falmouth, Mass. “It’s really during the late summer at the time when we usually see the minimum occur, which is right about now.”

So ice-free doesn’t mean there’s not one bit of ice left. It means that at minimum — which is usually in the middle of September — there is less than one million square kilometres. That may seem like a lot of ice, but the average minimum from 1981 to 2010 was roughly 6.3 million square kilometres.

This year was a bad year for the Arctic. On Sept. 23, the National Snow and Ice Data Center released the Arctic sea ice minimum for 2019, finding that it was the second lowest in satellite record, tied with 2007 and 2016, at 4.16 million square kilometres.

The lowest to date occurred in 2012, when the minimum reached a record low of roughly 3.4 million square kilometres.

The 13 lowest sea ice extents have all occurred within the past 13 years. This year, scientists were concerned that we were heading to a 2012 level, but in late August, weather patterns changed and there was some slight growth.

On top of how much area of ice is being lost, there’s also the concern about how much old ice — thicker ice — we’re losing, which is causing a big drop in the volume of ice contained in the Arctic.

“It’s been estimated that we’ve lost about three-quarters of the sea ice in terms of volume. Which is crazy. It’s happened within 40 years,” said Francis. “It is just a mind-boggling statistic to throw at people. It still takes my breath away.”

The Arctic versus the Antarctic

Both poles play an important, though different, role in Earth’s climate.

“The Arctic Ocean is an ocean surrounded by continents, so the sea ice is kind of pinned in there and kind of protected,” said Walt Meier, senior research scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center. “Whereas the Antarctic is a continent surrounded by oceans, so the sea ice grows outward from there.”

Ice breaks apart from the Larsen C ice shelf in Antarctica in 2017. It was roughly 6,000 square kilometres in area. (NASA Earth Observatory/Joshua Stevens/Landsat/USGS)

As a result, most of the Antarctic ice breaks up annually. There isn’t much multi-year ice like there is in the Arctic. That means that the reflectivity of that ice — the albedo — doesn’t play as large a role as that of the Arctic in regulating Earth’s temperature.

And while there has been some back and forth with sea ice growth in the Antarctic, that’s not the primary concern for glaciologists and climatologists for the region. Instead, it’s the melting of the ice sheets, large areas of ice that sit atop land. Data shows that warmer ocean currents are causing rapid surface melting of these ice sheets and glaciers in West Antarctica. And that, in turn, leads to a rise in sea levels.


While some people believe that an ice-free Arctic could be a good thing — opening up a new shipping route, oil and gas extraction, and tourism — there are likely deep repercussions.

For one, oil and gas extraction is part of what is contributing to climate change. Exploration in the Arctic would release more of the very greenhouse gases that caused the rapid Arctic ice loss in the first place.

There are also concerns over Canadian Arctic sovereignty, and that a rise in shipping activity also increases the chance of an environmental disaster that could further threaten the already-delicate Arctic ecosystem.

The landscape of the Mackenzie Delta is a maze of small lakes and rivers. This waterlogged environment has always been one of constant change, but the melting permafrost is now transforming it in ways no one has ever seen. (David Michael Lamb/CBC)

But an ice-free Arctic has even more far-reaching effects. As the saying goes: What happens in the Arctic doesn’t stay in the Arctic.

“It’s an experiment on a grand scale,” said Paul Crowley, the World Wildlife Fund’s Arctic vice-president. “The north, the Canadian Arctic, folks in the north, our communities are already challenged. So this is just another layer.”

Crowley notes that melting permafrost in the western Arctic is causing houses to sink or collapse; roads are falling apart; airstrips are no longer facing the right direction because of changing winds; and harvesters and hunters, who long relied on traditional knowledge, are now facing new conditions like thin ice that is costing lives.

And then there’s the weather around the world. The jet stream, a column of air that travels from west to east that drives weather across the northern hemisphere, relies on the temperature difference between the Arctic and the south. But when the temperature difference is not as pronounced, the jet stream begins to develop kinks. This can have widespread effects such as creating systems that prolong heat waves in southern Ontario and Quebec or even Europe, or slow hurricanes to a near standstill, as was seen with Dorian earlier this month.

So although most Canadians — and most of the world’s population — live far from the Arctic, its rapid changes will have effects felt across the globe.

“I think we have an incredible capacity to adapt, but we’re going to push our limits, and we’re going to live in a world that is already difficult for very many,” Crowley said. But, he added, bluntly, “Of course we can better prepare, and be better at giving ourselves a chance at being resilient, but we need to stop crapping in our own bed.”

Related stories from around the North:

Canada: Whitehorse, northwestern Canada declares climate change emergency, CBC News

China: As China adapts to a melting Arctic, Shanghai prepares for the worst, The Independent Barents Observer

Finland: How will Finland become carbon neutral by 2035?, Yle News

Greenland: Faster ice melt in Greenland could mean stronger hurricanes for North America’s East Coast: study, CBC News

Norway: Emissions dropping in EU, but not in Norway, The Independent Barents Observer

Russia: The Arctic shipping route no one is talking about, Cryopolitics Blog

Sweden: IPCC climate report warns “extreme sea level events” will occur frequently, Radio Sweden

United States: Heat stress that caused Alaska salmon deaths a sign of things to come, scientist warns, CBC News

Nicole Mortillaro, CBC News

For more news from Canada visit CBC News.

One thought on “What an ice-free Arctic really means, and why it matters so much

  • Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 14:38

    Canada was covered with 3 miles of ice only 25,000 years ago. You should be thankful that it’s mostly gone… but it will be back and we don’t have anything to do with that.

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

Leave a Reply

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.
Netiquette »

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *