The Supreme Court of Canada, in Ottawa, ruled last week in what some are calling a 'serious setback' with regard to fair representation of aboriginal people on juries.

The Supreme Court of Canada, in Ottawa, ruled last week in what some are calling a 'serious setback' with regard to fair representation of aboriginal people on juries.
Photo Credit: PC / Sean Kilpatrick

Supreme Court ruling a ‘serious setback’ for fair aboriginal representation on juries


The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in the case of an Ontario Aboriginal man, who was pleading his conviction in a case of manslaughter, on the basis of the lack of representation of aboriginal people, on the jury that convicted him.

it became evident that not only were there no aboriginal people on the jury, there were none in the jury pool, denying the man the right to an independent and impartial jury, according to the Ontario Court of Appeal.

“This is very bad news…”

The Supreme Court of Canada overturned that decision, and reinstated the conviction on Thursday, May 21, 2015,
The majority of the nine-member Supreme Court, ruled that the Ontario government had fulfilled its obligation to try and recruit aboriginal people into the jury pool.

Kim Stanton, Legal Director of the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund, said the ruling is  “a disappointment”.


Kim Stanton said, “It’s unfortunate that the majority of the Court. while recognizing the long-standing systemic under-representation of indigenous people in the jury system, didn’t chose to rectify it through the courts. The majority basically said it’s up to the government to do that, and they also said that the steps that the Ontario government had taken to rectify the situation were reasonable and that that’s all they needed to do they didn’t need to be so concerned about the actual outcome of their process to increase the numbers on the jury rolls they just had to make a reasonable effort to get them on the jury roll in the first place.”

Lawyer Julian Falconer, who represents Nishnawbe Aski Nation, (NAN) made up of 49 First Nations in Northern Ontario said, “This is very bad news for what has been a long and protracted journey to start to mend fences and create real partnerships in addressing the relationship between Aboriginal people and the Canadian justice system,”

“The Supreme Court risks making itself irrelevant”

In an interview with CBC Radio, Julian Falconer, an intervenor in the case, said the Supreme Court decision is a “serious setback”. Regarding the reasonable efforts the Ontario government made to increase indigenous representation on juries,

Falconer clarified the recent history.  He explained, “between 2000 and 2008 the Ontario government knew that it was operating on dated lists and neglected to advise First Nations that that was the case. Ontario didn’t tell First Nations, as an example, that they left Kashechewan entirely out of the jury roll system. And when NAN asked for answers in 2008, the Attorney General refused at that time to mount an enquiry. So to suggest they made reasonable efforts, frankly flies in the face of the facts.  Second, the suggestion that First Nations somehow didn’t want to participate and didn’t step up flies in the face of the volunteer project that just successfully produced 473 volunteers so people have difficulty with these facts, there’s no doubt about it.”

Former Supreme Court judge, Frank Iacobucci released a review of First Nations representation on Ontario juries, that was commissioned by the province, in 2013.  But as Julian Falconer said in the CBC radio interview, “what this case is probably more about is that the Supreme Court of Canada risks making itself irrelevant on serious gains on First Nations issues. If cases continue like this, if this is the approach they take, you’re going to see efforts made by people to work around the Supreme Court of Canada rather than the court having the lead.”

In 2013

Categories: Uncategorized

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet Netiquette guidelines.

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


One comment on “Supreme Court ruling a ‘serious setback’ for fair aboriginal representation on juries
  1. Avatar Luc says:

    Laws should be fair and for all. So why is this negative “provincial story” getting a “Canadian” tag? What about the First Nation Reserve in Quebec that has banned all non-aboriginals from living there? So this assumes all whites are racists and can’t judge this man on his actions? What a pathetic pandering to divide us.