@*@ Header

Mother Teresa- Canadian study raises questions about attitudes and conduct
Photo Credit: cbc

Canadian study: Mother Teresa not so “saintly”

In an article in the journal “Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses” Canadian researchers suggest Mother Teresa was in fact not very “saintly”.  The report is entitled, “Les côtés ténébreux de Mère Teresa” ,or  loosely translated as, The dark sides of Mother Teresa.

The research team of Professor Serge Larivée, from the Department of Psychoeducation at the University of Montreal, and colleague Geneviève Chénard, along with Carole Sénéchal from the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Education suggest that the Vatican should have taken a closer look at her views, and handling of money.

Echoing earlier work by journalist and author Christopher Hitchens, they say that her image does not stand up to fact, and that beatification was orchestrated by an effective media campaign. The authors say that Mother Teresa’s rise to international attention began with an interview on the BBC with the famous Malcolm Muggeridge who shared her anti-abortion views. She quickly realized the power of mass media and used it effectively in promotion.

The Canadian research team collected 502 documents on the life and work of Mother Teresa  (Agnes Gonxha), and after eliminating duplicates, were left with 287 documents about the founder of the Order of the Missionaries of Charity (OMC)

They raise questions about “her rather dubious way of caring for the sick, questionable political contacts,  her suspicious management of the enormous sums of money she received, and her overly dogmatic views regarding, in particular, abortion, contraception, and divorce.”

During her life, she opened over 500 missions welcoming the sick and the poor, but doctors visiting such missions in Calcutta  described them more as “homes for the dying”. They claimed there was significantly poor hygiene, even unfit conditions, a shortage of real care, inadequate food, and no painkillers.

“There is something beautiful in seeing the poor accept their lot, to suffer it like Christ’s Passion. The world gains much from their suffering,” was her reply to criticism, cites the journalist Christopher Hitchen.

The report suggests that although her foundation raised hundreds of millions of dollars, but was less than generous with it to those in need. During numerous floods in India or following the explosion of a pesticide plant in Bhopal, she offered numerous prayers and medallions of the Virgin Mary but no direct or monetary aid.

Doctors also dispute the miracle that was accredited to Mother Teresa, saying it was their drug treatment that cured a Monica Besra of her abdominal pain caused by an ovarian cyst and tuberculosis.

The Vatican however, was quick to classify it as a miracle. Mother Teresa’s popularity was such that she had become untouchable for the population, which had already declared her a saint. “What could be better than beatification followed by canonization of this model to revitalize the Church and inspire the faithful especially at a time when churches are empty and the Roman authority is in decline?” Larivée and his colleagues ask.

The researchers say that Mother Teresa undoubtedly inspired others to humanitarian work which has helped many of the sick and poor around the world but suggest that media coverage of Mother Teresa should have been more rigourous.

The printed version of their report, available only in French, will be published in March 2013 in issue 42 of Studies in Religion / Sciences religieuses. (abstract available here) This study received no specific funding.

Posted in

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

4 comments on “Canadian study: Mother Teresa not so “saintly”
  1. Unlike the vast majority of people whose only source of information about this “saint” is a superficial news media that has never made any in depth, on site study of Mother Teresa’s work, what I trust is the work of people like Dr. Aroup Chatterjee, who was born in Calcutta and who spent eight years of his life, after briefly working for one of Mother Teresa’s homes, doing the research which culminated in his 425 page book “The Final Verdict”, published in 2002, and the 2013 study by Canadian University scholars (currently available only in French), which concludes that Teresa was no saint, but that her false, glorious image as one may have inspired OTHERS to help the poor. (I understand there’s a similar critical study that was done in Germany.)

    If you don’t have time to read such extensive scholarship, I offer a brief synopsis which most people DO have time to read, at my http://JesusWouldBeFurious.Org/MotherTeresa webpage. Anyone who believes that honesty requires that we at least LISTEN to BOTH SIDES of a question before deciding which to embrace should DO SOMETHING to learn why M T has her critics.

  2. Maria de Gannes says:

    I guess not many of us would do what she did.

  3. This is utter rubbish, based on secondary sources. As one who has donated and monitored their usage of funds I have no doubt that their funds were well-spent and rigorously audited.

    She sent no humanitarian aid to Bhopal/Latur and other tragedies in India as that was not her mission and she definitely was not overflowing with funds.

    If the missions did not have disposable needles, antiseptic ambience because they did not have any funds to maintain them in that fashion.

    The Orphanages were sparse and frugally maintained as the funds given by individuals and corporates were not overflowing. As far the Homes for dying are concerned they were essentially Carehomes for the terminally ill, majority of them declared untreatable by Hospitals and abandoned by their own relatives. Please remember India is not UK, where if you have no where else to go after being treated in the Hospital, the Care homes take you in at Government’s expense.

    Allegations about funds—all the persons who are being vilified were good people at the time of acceptance of the funds !

    Mother Teresa became a Saint in 19 years. Last year a Spanish nun was made a Saint in 17 years. The vilifiers say that rules were broken for her. This is a falsehood.

    I am sure I can go on and on. Thanks for your patience.

    • Jazzy Jahangir says:

      Mr.Kaza I don’t agree with you sir, she was no Saint. She wanted people to suffer and remain clawed in the shackles of poverty.As it made her work easy.

      I don’t agree.👍

1 Pings/Trackbacks for "Canadian study: Mother Teresa not so “saintly”"
  1. […] about assimilating them into Catholicism. Indeed, she developed the mindset that the poor couldn’t be helped to move up in their station in life. She cared more about the state of their […]