@*@ Header
@*@ Single

For three years Dave Johnson had to right Rogers cell phone company and its collection agencies to prove that they had the wrong man for an outstanding bill. Johnson had never had an account with Rogers.
Photo Credit: CBC

Rogers cell bill ruins credit rating of Canadian man with no Rogers account

For three years Dave Johnson was caught in a Kafkaesque nightmare. Collection agencies working for Canada’s largest cell phone company Rogers claimed he owed more than $5,400 on his Rogers account, but he’d never had one.

When he tried to explain to Rogers its mistake, employees asked him for an account number. When he said he didn’t have one, they said they couldn’t help him. When he convinced one collection agency that they were going after the wrong Dave Johnson, another collection agency came after him.

Along the way, Johnson discovered another man with his name was also going through the same problems.

Because of his ruined credit rating his bank wouldn’t allow him to co-sign for his son’s mortgage. And he couldn’t use the equity in his home, which is paid for.

“They are just throwing darts. They are not chasing the person that was responsible for  the debt,” Johnson said. “They’re chasing the person that they think maybe have a similar sounding name.”

Johnson’s fight and that of other customers became public after a report on Canada’s national public television broadcaster CBC.

Howard Maker, Commissioner of Telecommunications Complaints, said he hears too many stories like this. “There’s too many no-brainers that come all the way to us, the industry’s ombudsman, and that’s very unfortunate.”

In an email statement to CBC, Rogers said that “generally the system works” and suggested that the fault is with the collections agencies it hired.

More information:
CBC News - Rogers bill ruins credit rating of man who doesn’t have Rogers account – here

twitter.com/wojtekgwiazda

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Society
@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

 characters available

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current day month ye@r *

2 comments on “Rogers cell bill ruins credit rating of Canadian man with no Rogers account
  1. Edward Schweikert says:

    Standard operational procedures!!! Businesses and the legal field have all the rights!

  2. David Gerrior says:

    People should be able to sue this kind of behavior. It is a terrible misuse of corporate power. They should be heavily fined (with the fine going to the customer not the government) because this is the only language these people understand. For his pain and suffering I would suggest a million dollars would be fair! but the poor guy will never see a penny nor will he get an apology! Shame on them!