Royal Canadian Air Force CF-18 Hornets depart after refueling with a KC-135 Stratotanker assigned to the 340th Expeditionary Air Refueling Squadron, October 30, 2014, over Iraq.

Royal Canadian Air Force CF-18 Hornets depart after refueling with a KC-135 Stratotanker assigned to the 340th Expeditionary Air Refueling Squadron, October 30, 2014, over Iraq.
Photo Credit: PC / Staff Sgt. Perry Aston

Canadian CF-18 did not bomb Iraqi soldiers: DND

Share

Defence officials in Ottawa vigorously denied Russian and Iraqi media reports Monday that a Canadian CF-18 fighter jet had mistakenly killed scores of Iraqi soldiers while providing close air support to Iraqi security forces trying to recapture the western city of Fallujah last Friday.

“The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) is aware of recent media reports of Canadian involvement in a potential friendly fire incident near Fallujah, Iraq, on December 18, 2015,” said in an email statement Maj. Isabelle Bresse. “CF-18 Hornets did not conduct an airstrike near Fallujah, Iraq, on December 18, 2015.”

According to the military’s website tracking Canadian airstrikes in Iraq, on Dec. 18, “two CF-18 Hornets successfully struck three ISIS fighting positions northwest of Mosul using precision guided munitions‎.” Mosul is about 400 km north of Fallujah. In fact, Canadian jets were nowhere near Fallujah all of last week.

The denial came after the Russian news agency Sputnik ran a story on Monday, which quoted an anonymous source in the Iraqi military, claiming the coalition aircraft that mistakenly bombed the Iraqi soldiers was a Canadian fighter jet. 

The anonymous source told Sputnik that the pilot initially fired two missiles at Islamic State (IS) militants, killing 40 people, but the third missile hit a group of Iraqi army soldiers during their offensive on IS positions. 

When contacted for clarification Monday, the U.S. Central Command, which leads the Operation Inherent Resolve against Islamic State militants, said “the Coalition is investigating the incident and will make further details available when appropriate.”

Earlier reports had indicated that the airstrike had been carried out by American forces.

U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter told the Associated Press Saturday the airstrike seems to have been “a mistake that involved both sides.”

“These kinds of things happen when you’re fighting side by side as we are,” Carter told AP. He said the airstrike  had “all the indications of being a mistake of the kind that can happen on a dynamic battlefield.”

Iraq’s defence minister, Khalid al-Obeidi, told reporters in Baghdad, the Iraqi capital, that the strike killed one officer and nine soldiers. He said Iraq had begun an investigation and that the “wrongdoer would be punished according to Iraqi law.”

Canadian Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan is on a visit to Iraq and met with Iraqi and Kurdish defence officials. Speaking at a teleconference from Irbil, the capital of the Kurdish Regional Government, in northern Iraq, Sajjan reiterated the Liberal government’s pledge to withdraw all six Canadian fighter jets from the U.S.-led bombing campaign.

Share
Posted in International, Society

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

One comment on “Canadian CF-18 did not bomb Iraqi soldiers: DND
  1. Cheryl Thomson says:

    In so many controversial news stories recently, the claims of Russia are vehemently denied. Then it turns out that Putin was correct all along. Our Canadian CF-18s need to leave the theatre of war for several reasons, one of which is that they are bad actors who were only brought in to play a cameo role anyway.