Marc Montgomery, Carmel Kilkenny, Levon Sevunts

Marc Montgomery, Carmel Kilkenny, Levon Sevunts
Photo Credit: rci

The LINK Online Sun. July 30, 2017


Your hosts  Carmel, Levon, Marc (video of show at bottom)

Helmut Oberlander, 93, has said he was forcibly conscripted by the Nazis when he was 17 years old. For the fourth time, he is fighting a federal government decision to strip him of his citizenship. (CIJA)
Helmut Oberlander, 93, has said he was forcibly conscripted by the Nazis when he was 17 years old. For the fourth time, he is fighting a federal government decision to strip him of his citizenship. © CIJA

Helmut Oberlander is now 93. He is no longer a Canadian citizen, well technically at least.

Born in the Ukraine he is accused of being a member of a German SS unit charged with exterminating Jews and lying about his past to immigrate to Canada where he gained citizenship in 1960

The Waterloo, Ontario resident this week was stripped of his Canadian citizenship, for the fourth time through a cabinet decision.

He and his defenders claim he was a low-level interpreter and had no choice in working with the SS death squads. He is going to appeal the ruling.

Levon spoke with Efraim Zuroff, the chief Nazi-hunter at the Simon Wiesenthal Center and the director of its Israel Office.


Canada has protected 10.6 per cent of its land while the global average is 15 per cent, according to the non-profit CPAWS. © Irwin Barrett

Canada is a land of vast lakes and forests, or so most think, but the country is lagging behind other G7 when it comes to protecting those natural environments.

A new report by the non-profit agency the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS) says protection exists for only 10.6 per cent of the landscape.  That’s well below the G7 average of 15 per cent, and even further below the 17 per cent promised by the government in 2010, and renewed by federal, provincial, and territorial governments with a target date of 2020.

Lynn spoke to Éric Hébert-Daly.of CPAWS who thinks Canada has lagged behind because Canadians take their vast wilderness and environment for granted.


The Supreme Court of Canada has made two landmark rulings today over the government’s constitutional *duty to consult* with aboriginal groups on energy development projects.
The Supreme Court of Canada has made two landmark rulings today over the government’s constitutional *duty to consult* with aboriginal groups on energy development projects. © Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press

It is considered a landmark decision, after fighting their way through the court system, the Inuit of Baffin Island, Nunavut, finally won their case.

They’d be fighting against a National Energy Board approval for seismic oil and gas exploration in the ocean off their coast.

They said the testing would scare, harm or even kill the marine life they traditionally depend upon. They say they were not properly consulted before approval was given.

The Supreme Court agreed and cancelled the exploration licence.  It also ruled the government has a clear constutional and treaty obligation to properly consult on development projects which affect First Nations and Inuit and their traditional way of life. This ruling will have an affect on almost all major energy and other developments going forward.

Marc spoke with Nader Hasan, lawyer for the Inuit.

Images of the week

Posted in

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.