European Union considers to prohibit the use and carriage of heavy-fuel oil for vessels calling at EU ports.
In a resolution, adopted on Tuesday by 111 votes to 8, with 1 abstention, Members of the European Parliament’s Committees on Foreign Affairs and Environment says heavy-fuel oil (HFO) should be banned from all ships navigating Arctic waters.
If put into force, such a ban would dramatically increase the costs of sailings to Arctic Norway, Iceland, Greenland, Russia, Canada, Alaska and trans-Arctic shipments between Europe and Asia via the Northern Sea Route.
Light fuel oil is way more expensive than HFO.
For the environment, heavy fuel oil has more negative impact because when burned, emissions sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and black carbon is much higher. A spill with heavy-fuel oil in Arctic waters could cause disastrous consequences for marine life, sea mammals and birds because it emulsifies on the ocean surface and is extremely difficult to clean up.
The EU resolution will be put to a vote by the full Parliament on March 2nd.
Northern Sea Route
Environment Committee co-rapporteur Sirpa Pietikainen from Finland said: “The EU needs to have a strong policy for the Arctic co-operation, not least because we are closely linked to the rapidly changing Arctic climate: on one the hand, we are affected by the changes in weather and living conditions caused by melting ice, on the other hand we are among the greatest emitters of pollutants to the Arctic atmosphere”.
Both the Commission and Member States are asked to actively facilitate both the ban on use of heavy-fuel oil and carriage of such fuel on all vessels sailing the Arctic.
The Parliamentarians asked the Commission to include the environmental and climate risks of the use of heavy-fuel oil in its story on the risks that the increase in navigation of the Northern Sea Route would bring.
It is expected that new trade routes will opens up between Europe and Asia as the Arctic sea ice melts away in a speed few climate researchers ever have predicted.
Black, thick and smelly
Last week, CEO Daniel Skjeldam with the Norwegian cruise-liner Hurtigruten said at the Arctic Frontiers conference in Tromsø that it is high time to ban heavy-fuel oil in the Arctic.
«The use of heavy fuel oil (HFO) has already been banned in the Antarctic, now it’s time to ban it in the Arctic as well,» Daniel Skjeldam said and called on his own business-colleagues to take responsible actions.
«The shipping industry must be frontrunners in promoting regulations that will secure sustainable Arctic growth.»
Worst case scenario for the tourism industry is to get the purity of the Arctic destroyed by black, thick and smelly oil.
«If heavy fuel oil is spilled in cold Arctic waters, it will have larger consequences than anywhere else. The Arctic deserves sustainable growth and innovation, and the industry needs to move first,» Skjeldam said.
The European Parliament members state that if it does not prove feasible to ban the heavy-fuel oil from vessels in the Arctic, «the EU should take measures to prohibit the use and carriage of heavy-fuel oil for vessels calling at EU ports.»
Related stories from around the North:
Canada: Canada, France, Norway and Sweden express support for ban on heavy fuel oil in the Arctic, Radio Canada International
China: Chinese company mulls more Arctic shipping, Barents Observer
Finland: Some Arctic good news – not #fakenews!, blog by Irene Quaile, Deutsche Welle
Iceland: Calls for action at Arctic shipping conference, Alaska Dispatch News
Russia: Arctic cruise industry expands, Cryopolitics Blog
Sweden: Swedish icebreakers gear up for Arctic role, Radio Sweden
United States: Arctic no shipping rival to Suez: expert, Alaska Public Radio Network