A successful Saami-led, salmon rewilding project on the Näätämö river in Arctic Finland illustrates the success of partnership between Indigenous knowledge and western science on environmental questions, say the authors of a recent paper, but outdated perceptions and prejudices means these kinds of partnerships elsewhere still too often fail.
“(Scientists and policy makers) still struggle with ways of knowing that are beyond what science is able to capture,” said Tero Mustonen, a geographer and one of the paper’s authors, in a phone interview with Eye on the Arctic from Finland.
“The argument is often that Indigenous knowledge can’t be measured and reproduced like scientific data can, but the limits of science are also real,” he said, pointing out that a scientific presence most parts of the Arctic, outside of Russia, rarely goes back more than 100 years, compared to the thousands of years of knowledge available to traditional knowledge holders.
“That doesn’t mean science is invalid, but because of that, (the scientific community) has a very hard time stomaching what comes forward from Indigenous communities where their observations capture both the seen and the unseen in the landscape, the profound cycles of nature, and the way the complexities of Indigenous knowledge is contextualised and embedded in things like local languages and place names,” said Mustonen, also the president of Snowchange Cooperative, an NGO based in Finland and made up of a network of local groups and Indigenous peoples around the world, that also participated in the project.
“But if (a researcher) can stomach that, and if the relationship between the scientists and the community is good, very high quality science can happen.”
What’s happening to the salmon on the Näätämö River?
The article, “How Traditional Knowledge Comes to Matter in Atlantic Salmon Governance in Norway and Finland,” was published in December in Arctic, a journal from the Arctic Institute of North America.
In it, the authors examine cooperation projects between scientists and Saami communities and explore what made the Näätämö river co-management project considered a success.
The Saami are Indigenous reindeer herders whose traditional lands span the Arctic regions of Norway, Sweden, Finland and western Russia.
The role of fishing in Saami culture is a key part of the culture, says Pauliina Feodoroff, a Saami leader of the Näätämö river project, because even as the number of Saami families engaged in traditional reindeer herding decline, almost all Saami families still fish.
“Fishing is not only providing the food and handicraft materials and the sense of self-sufficiency, but it also the way of living that still brings the traditional laws concerning the land use and family areas to this day,” Feodoroff said in an email interview with Eye on the Arctic.
The Näätämö river is located in Finnish Lapland and empties out into the Varanger Fjord in Norway.
The river is an important waterway for Atlantic salmon, but their habitat has been negatively impacted by mining, development and climate change, and the Saami of the area, known as Skolt Saami, have noticed ever dwindling salmon numbers over several years.
There are approximately 700 Skolt Saami living in Finland.
“The salmon river, Näätämö is the only river that we can access for salmon fishing, that is the only place we can connect with the salmon,” Pauliina Feodoroff said.
“The river cannot be separated from the families, and the families cannot be separated from the salmon. And the salmon cannot be separated from the river. It was our people who first started to make observations that the size, amount and the family of the salmon coming to the Näätämö river is changing.
“We mind about this since we have no elsewhere to go.”
Partnership with western science
Feodoroff says fishery management is top-down in Finland and it wasn’t until the Skolt Saami collaborated with scientists she describes as “really progressive researchers” that their observations were taken seriously.
The project started in 2011 and was built on rigorous ecological surveys, temperature measurements, along with Saami observations and participation, Mustonen said.
“Too often scientific projects will go into Indigenous communities, and for example, get people to collect samples, then say ‘We’re listening to Indigenous knowledge.’ But that’s being a field assistant in a biological survey, that has nothing to do with working with traditional knowledge.
“That’s why the narrative has to change and we have to completely shift this in the Arctic.”
In the Näätämö project, it was the Saami that took the lead and who defined what success would mean and what would be done to restore salmon spawning areas.
As part of the project, researchers also gave the Saami co-researchers high quality digital cameras to pick up anything out of the ordinary in the research area, or document changes that science couldn’t capture.
Important findings came out of the project including documentation of a southern beetle (Potosia cuprea) that hadn’t been seen in the area before as well as identifying spawning areas and sites of ecological damage.
“Science is limited to our remote sensing and field expeditions, but many of these Saami Indigenous peoples have been occupying sites along the river all years long,” Mustonen said.
“In the Saami language they have specific names for different ages of salmon, whether they are female or male, coming or returning, going out the ocean, so they can capture what science can’t.
“The mainstream narrative of climate change in the Arctic is that it’s happening now, today and it will get far worse, but Indigenous memory, skills and knowledge, even embedded in things like places names, have the potential of conveying new baselines and can help place current changes into a historical context.”
The Skolt Saami then initiated responses to the project’s findings including things like restoring damaged habitat and agreeing on harvest limitations to increase the number of spawning fish able to reach key areas.
“The science community in general could learn from this process is the earth-bound quality of knowing,” said Feodoroff.
“There is so much research done in Saami areas, both about nature and Saami cultures, that is kind of hanging in the air: a narrow and in best cases, a sharp slice of knowledge has been gathered and refined, but why and for what is never clear. And that unrooted knowledge somehow just floats, disturbed.
“Because when you start to know about something, it becomes a relationship. And the more you know, it becomes also a relationship with responsibilities. Since you now know better, you have to act accordingly.
“And the last part is too many times missing.”
Write to Eilís Quinn at eilis.quinn(at)cbc.ca
Related stories from around the North:
Canada: How Indigenous knowledge is helping scientists unravel the sick muskox mystery in Canada’s Arctic, Eye on the Arctic
Greenland: Ignoring Indigenous women’s traditional knowledge hurts Arctic science, G7 summit hears, Eye on the Arctic
Iceland: Arctic science agreement comes into effect on Wednesday, Eye on the Arctic
United States: Mixing science with traditional knowledge, researchers hope to get seal oil on the menu in Alaska, Alaska Public Radio Network