People run in panic after a coalition airstrike hit Islamic State fighters positions in Mosul, Iraq, November 17, 2016.

People run in panic after a coalition airstrike hit Islamic State fighters positions in Mosul, Iraq, November 17, 2016.
Photo Credit: Goran Tomasevic

Civilian casualties in Iraq and Syria mount amid intensifying Western and Russian air campaign

While Western media attention has been focused on the tragic deaths of about 85 Syrian civilians killed in a poison gas attack in northwestern Syria on April 4, as many as 3,400 civilians are estimated to have died in air strikes in Syria and Iraq conducted by the U.S.-led coalition in March.

In fact, as the campaigns to oust Islamic State militants from their strongholds in Mosul, in northern Iraq, and Raqqa, in eastern Syria continue to intensify, March saw the highest number of civilian deaths likely caused by the coalition over the last three years, according to a new report by Airwars.

The UK-based group of investigative journalists and volunteers that tracks the number of civilian casualties in Syria and Iraq followed up on a record 166 incidents allegedly involving coalition warplanes. That’s a 67-per-cent increase over the 99 events reported in February.

Source: Airwars

Outbombing Russia

Airwars says for the third straight month alleged non-combatant deaths from coalition airstrikes outweigh those of Russia.

Airwars estimates that coalition airstrikes in March killed between 1,782 and 3,471 civilian non-combatants in Syria and Iraq. Such high The group hasn’t seen such high numbers of civilian casualties caused by foreign aistrikes since the worst of Russia’s brutal air campaign in 2016.

“These very steep rises in likely civilian deaths from coalition actions are deeply worrying,” Airwars director Chris Woods said in a statement. “The number of airstrikes and targets hit in Syria actually fell during March – yet likely civilian deaths were up six-fold. This is the clearest evidence yet that coalition rule changes are placing civilians at greater risk of harm.”

Smoke rises after an U.S. airstrike, while the Iraqi army pushes into Topzawa village during the operation against Islamic State militants near Bashiqa, near Mosul, Iraq October 24, 2016.
Smoke rises after an U.S. airstrike, while the Iraqi army pushes into Topzawa village during the operation against Islamic State militants near Bashiqa, near Mosul, Iraq October 24, 2016. © Ahmed Jadallah

Data collected by Airwars from official sources shows that 3,878 munitions were dropped by the coalition on ISIL targets in March alone.

In the first three months of 2017, the coalition has dropped 10,918 munitions on targets in Iraq and Syria – with January, February and March each setting new records, according to Airwars.

This represents a 59 per cent rise in the number of bombs dropped during the same period in 2016, suggesting that President Donald Trump may be making good his election promise to “bomb the shit out of ISIS,” the report says.

Russian strikes also on the rise

After two consecutive months of relative calm in Syria, March also saw a significant and lethal rise in the number of incidents of concern allegedly involving Russian warplanes, the report says.

Airwars has tracked 114 such incidents in March – an 80 per cent increase over February’s claimed incidents.

“Russia’s focus seemed to be mainly on Idlib province, Hama and the Damascus eastern suburbs,” said Kinda Haddad, who leads the Airwars Syria team.
column-banner-LEVON

Posted in International, Politics

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

2 comments on “Civilian casualties in Iraq and Syria mount amid intensifying Western and Russian air campaign
  1. Jim Cowan says:

    Of course, no babies were involved otherwise Trump would be bombing …Americans.

  2. g says:

    which all goes to prove that Trump is in fact the antichrist!!!