Bitter debate ends with change to Canada’s national anthem

Canada's national anthem will very soon be officially ever so slightly changed in order to be "gender neutral" PHOTO: Mark Blinch-The Canadian Press

Bitter debate ends with change to Canada’s national anthem

Share

O Canada, the  country’s official national anthem has been changed after a long a bitter debate.

It’s all over two words.

The debate was to make it “gender neutral” by changing the line  “in all thy sons command” to “ in all of us command”.

After introduction and months long debate in the House of Commons the private members bill to make the change was passed by the Liberal majority in 2016.

Quebec composer Calixa Lavallee composed the music to O Canada in 1880 with French lyrics added shortly afterward as Chant National (anthem)

It then took 18 months in the Senate before the Liberal majority invoked some rare procedural motions, similar to closure of debate. The motion passed as Conservative senators boycotted the final vote because of the procedural moves.

The bill now heads to the Governor-General for “Royal Assent” approval after which it becomes law. The change actually reverts back to one of the original versions which did say “dost in us command”. It had been changed to “thy sons” as a patriotic gesture to the First World War effort.

What most Canadians don’t even realize is that O Canada only became our official anthem in 1980.

The tune was originally created in 1880 by French-Canadian composer Calixa Lavallee with French lyrics based based on a poem by Sir Adolphe-Basile Routhier, a Quebec judge. This was for a Quebec religious holiday.

It didn’t immediately catch on although it was played for the Royal visit of the Duke and Dutchess of Cornwall in 1901.  An Ontario judge, Stanley Weir wrote English lyrics in 1908 that boosted its popularity in English Canada.

Still throughout the decades, at official functions O Canada vied for status with another popular English song, “The Maple Leaf Forever” and of course “God Save the King (or later God Save the Queen).

The debate about the anthem continued as Canada approached it’s Centennial in 1967, but no-one could agree.

1980 CBC report (begins after commercial)

It is interesting to note that the French lyrics have never been changed.

As for the English version the gender (as which there were a number of versions proposed in he earliest years of the last century), the gender neutral issue is not the only point of contention with O Canada in English.

Challenges have also been raised over the use of the Christian word “God” and also, the use of “native” apparently implying to some a reference to First Nations aboriginals.

For now this new version is expected to receive Royal Assent quickly after which it becomes official.

Share
Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in Politics

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply to Hilary Taylor Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

5 comments on “Bitter debate ends with change to Canada’s national anthem
  1. Ken Wensley says:

    Anti-democratic

  2. Liam Fraser says:

    Trudeau has failed to listen to the overwhelming majority of Canadians. If Trudeau really wanted to change the anthem, he should have done it correctly with either The Maple Leaf Forever or go back to God save the Queen.

  3. Hilary Taylor says:

    A national anthem should NEVER BE CHANGED! What a country! This is the second time Canada has done this. So stupid!!! U would NEVER see the USA change the star spangled banner!

  4. UncleBill' says:

    I will NEVER support the liberals again, this is a really stupid event’