This Swissair MD-11 shown in Zurich in July 1998 just months before it crashed off the coast of Nova Scotia killing all on board, Sept 2. 1998. (Aero-icarus-WikiCC)

The tragedy of Swissair 111 – 20 years later

Share

Mystery, conspiracies, emotions endure

Everything seemed so normal on the evening of September 2, 1998 at the JFK International airport in New York.  Regular flyers on the New York to Geneva flight were relaxed and maybe bored, first time passengers were perhaps a little excited, and the very experienced cockpit crew calm as they performed routine duties as the large 3-engined MD-11 plane lifted off.

It was just after 8PM EDT.  Shortly afterward out over the ocean the pilots indicated there was a problem, but not serious. An hour after takeoff they decided to divert and land at Halifax Nova Scotia.

Within minutes the crew signalled an emergency as systems aboard the plane began to fail. Air traffic control suddenly lost contact as the jet with 215 passengers and 14 crew hurtled into the sea at high speed and disintegrated just a few kilometres off the Nova Scotia coast at Peggy’s Cove, near Halifax.

Underwater image of portion of the plane lying on the ocean floor about 50 metres deep. Much of the plane was reduced to much smaller bits (via CBC)

Local fishermen and rescuers were on the scene quickly but it was soon obvious there was no-one to rescue. Recovery began, and the bits and pieces began to be pulled from the ocean floor about 50 metres down.

The flight recorder data proved useless as it had stopped recording a few minutes before the crash.

The long and painstaking task of rebuilding the aircraft to determine what happened began in a hangar, along with the tragic task of identifying remains, mostly through dental records and DNA analysis.

Special equipment was brought in to recover wreckage (via CBC)

Valuables- mystery-rumours

It is now well-known the plane carried millions of dollars in diamonds, cash, and a Picasso painting.  Although 98 percent of the plane was eventually recoverd, and over 18,000 kilos of cargo, most of the valuables for some reason were apparently never found.

A small piece of the painting was recovered, and only some of the 49 kilograms of cash.  There is a great deal of speculation as to the loss of one kilogram of diamonds carried in a special tube and 4.5 kilos of other jewelry, and most of the cash, even though a special ocean floor “vacuum” was later employed over the area after most of the other plane pieces and cargo were recovered.

At about 50 metres the area is accessible to well-trained and experienced divers although diving in the area and recovering anything is illegal.

Vic Gerden, lead investigator into the crash of Swissair Flight 111 off Peggys Cove, N.S., stands in front of the plane’s cockpit at the reconstruction hangar at CFB Shearwater on May 27, 1999. (Andrew Vaughan/Canadian Press

Why?

The official version is that probably a cracked electrical wire above and just behind the cockpit was arcing and caught the metallised Mylar insulation on fire. It is believed that the wire or wires may have been related to a recently installed “in flight entertainment” system.

Some 13 wires were later determined to show evidence of electrical arcing. Although the cause was never proven with 100 per cent certainty, the Canadian investigation did reveal that the FAA approved insulation was in fact not fire resistant at all and that the end caps over the air conditioning system also concealed in the ceiling were easily melted, which could have provided oxygen to the fire spreading it rapidly.  The official final report was issued only in March, 2003.

But, there are other theories.

A Royal Canadian Mounted Police inspector during the two-year investigation alleges some disturbing aspects.

Although servicing crew were questioned, the former officer claims one of the employees servicing the aircraft in New York was never found. Thomas Juby claims the man provided false identification to the employer, worked one shift only, on that plane, and then disappeared.

Juby also claimed there was evidence of an incendiary device but that this was ignored. In his later book on the investigation, he alleges there was a cover-up possibly concerning terrorism.

Thomas Juby, RCMP investigator claims there was a cover-up in the investigation of Swissair 111

More questions?

Swissair occurred in 1998 shortly after leaving JFK airport in New York.  There was also a strange and highly unusual 13 minute loss of communication with the plane shortly before the crash, which cannot be explained.

In July 1996, a Boeing 747 (TWA flight 800), exploded in the air shortly after leaving JFK along the same regular flight path Swissaire most planes take en route to Europe.  That was attributed to a wiring short near a fuel tank, although many insist it was from a missile, possibly fired from the ground or ocean below by person’s unknown, or from a U.S Navy missile gone awry.

Journalists inspect boxes of the tonnes of debris from Swissair Flight 111 at CFB Shearwater in Dartmouth, N.S., in December 1998. (Andrew Vaughan/Canadian Press)

In 1999 Egypt Air Boeing 767, from Los Angeles to Cairo, made a stop at JFK, before resuming. Shortly afterward it made a steep dive into the ocean near the same area.

While an Egyptian investigation blamed a mechanical problem, the US investigation said such problems could have been overcome if they had in fact occurred and blamed the crash on  suicide, the flight recorders indicating the relief pilot saying in Arabic “ I put my trust in God” before shutting down the engines.

There are other reports of “flares” shooting up a few days before TWA 800, and missiles reported passing near other aircraft in those years.  In 1996, Pakistan Airlines 712 reported what the crew was convinced was a missile passing close.

One of two memorials, this on the west side of St Margaret’s Bay at Bayswater where some unidentified remains are buried. (Outriggr-wikiCC)

Some speculate a fragment of a missile exploding near Swissair may have penetrated the plane from above possibly causing the wiring problem, although pilot transcripts report nothing unusual at that point.

There are mysteries in the years before and after the Swissair tragedy and of course still many unanswered and unresolved questions about Swissair 111 itself.

What is known is that 229 people died suddenly and tragically and hundreds more family members, relatives and friends were left to grieve and always wonder why, while thousands of local residents, recovery personnel, and investigators were also forever deeply affected by the event 20 years ago today.

In Nova Scotia, there are two memorials to the crash which occurred just outside St Margaret’s Bay, one on a small promontory near Peggy’s Cove an the east side of the bay overlooking the ocean out towards the crash site about 10 kilometres offshore, and a larger one on the west side at Bayswater where some of the unidentified remains are buried.

The Peggy’s Cove memorial on the east side of the bay (Aconcagua-wikiCC)

As for Swissair, the line went bankrupt two years later, in part because of the crash.

Peggy’s Cove memorial- (Trip Advisor LLC)

Additional information- sources

Canadian Press-(via PostMedia): Aug 20/18: Facts,figures Swissair 111

https://nationalpost.com/pmn/news-pmn/canada-news-pmn/a-few-facts-and-figures-about-the-crash-of-swissair-flight-111-off-nova-scotia

Encyclopaedia Britannica: Swissair 111

https://www.britannica.com/event/Swissair-flight-111

Hullthread: mystery of Swissair 111

http://www.thehullthread.com/swissair.htm

TWA 800- missile theory

http://www.mega.nu/ampp/twa800.html

Share
Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in International

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*