This past Monday a public sector union leader voiced concern and surprise that the Canadian government was implementing a new mandatory performance review of public sector employees.
Robyn Benson, the president of the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC), which represents 180,000 federal employees, said that performance evaluations have always been a part of the public sector reality.
In an interview with Radio Canada International (see here) she worried that this was just another excuse for the government to cut down on the number of public service employees.
And that’s hard for her to accept. As public servants, her members have seen the number of people giving services to Canadians drop, as the number of Canadians who need those services rise.
The minister who made the announcement for the Canadian government on May 28 about the new performance review was Tony Clement, the President of the Treasury Board.
His office was asked by Radio Canada International’s Wojtek Gwiazda two questions:
1) How is this new review different from the performance reviews already in place?
2) How much will it cost to implement this new mandatory review?
Here are the answers we received via email from the Treasury Board:
Q1) How is this new review different from the performance reviews already in place?
A1) Currently, departments use different processes and forms, making it difficult to track progress and report outcomes.
Under the new regime, there will be mandatory training for managers and supervisors, and a standardized process and forms. All employees must have annual performance objectives and a mid-year review. There will be active monitoring of probationary periods as well as structured support and guidance for employees to improve performance within clear timelines. There is clarity on the steps to be taken if performance does not improve, and these include withholding of increments, demotion or termination. Processes will ensure that employees are treated fairly. Departments will develop mandatory performance management programs with mechanisms to monitor progress and results.
From | To |
No formal policy requiring performance management for employees other than executives | Directive requiring performance management for all employees |
No mandatory training | Consistent, mandatory training for managers and supervisors |
Departments use different processes / forms | Standardized process and forms, and all employees must have annual performance objectives and mid-year reviews (informal conversation) |
No systematic monitoring of probationary periods or formal sign-off of “successful” completion | Active monitoring, including attestation that employees have passed the probationary period |
Inconsistent follow-up following performance appraisals | Standardized follow-up process, including an action plan to support and guide employees to improve performance within clear timelines |
No standardized departmental performance management programs | Mandatory departmental performance management programs, with departmental review panels and process to review performance assessment results |
No tracking and reporting of outcomes (e.g. training take-up, promotions, demotions, departures, etc.) | Departments maintain records of the distribution of employee performance ratings that can be rolled up public-service wide |
Q2) How much will it cost to implement this new mandatory review?
A2) The initiative is being funded through the reallocation of resources, no new funding is required to implement it.
A spokesperson for Treasury Board President Tony Clement said the minister was not available for an interview this week.
More information:
RCI – Public sector union president wary of goals of “new” performance evaluations – here
May 28, 2013 press release of Treasury Board on performance review – here
Text of speech of President of the Treasury Board Tony Clement to the Association of Professional Executives of the Public Service of Canada – here
Public Service Alliance of Canada website – www.psac-afpc.com
Robyn Benson blog – Conservative performance review – here
For reasons beyond our control, and for an undetermined period of time, our comment section is now closed. However, our social networks remain open to your contributions.