Lynn Desjardins, Marc Montgomery, Carmel Kilkenny
Photo Credit: rci

The LINK Online, Sat., July 4, 2015

Your hosts this week, Lynn, Carmel, and Marc

Listen
null
When it comes to Canadian stereotypes, the comedy characters Bob and Doug McKenzie got it right by wearing toques, plaid shirts, parkas and saying “eh” a lot..and drinking lots of beer © CBC

Ah stereotypes and clichés…when it comes to Canada, that we’re a hockey mad, toque wearing people who live in igloos and say “eh” a lot, in a land of beavers and moose and we travel a lot by canoe..

Well, according to a new survey, we do say “eh” a lot, toques are considered by most Canadians to be a Canadian type of clothing.

It turns out that some of those stereotypes do kind of fit, but others not so much.

A recent survey looked into how we speak, what is “Canadian” clothing, our musical stars, nature, and how many Canadians do or have seen or participate in what are generally perceived to be Canadianisms.

Lynn spoke with Anthony Wilson-Smith, president of Historica Canada, the group that commissioned the survey.

The Canadian Cattlemen's Assocation estimates the U.S. labelling legislation costs the Canadian pork and beef industries about $1.4 billion annually. The retaliatory measures, The federal government is seeking authroity at the WTO to impose equivalent tariffs on US goods, but the the US has launched an arbitration request on the numbers, furthering delaying the possibiity of Canadaian tariffs on US goods
The Canadian Cattlemen’s Assocation estimates the U.S. labelling legislation costs the Canadian pork and beef industries about $1.4 billion annually. The retaliatory measures, The federal government is seeking authroity at the WTO to impose equivalent tariffs on US goods, but the the US has launched an arbitration request on the numbers, furthering delaying the possibiity of Canadaian tariffs on US goods © J. Scott Applewhite-Associated Press

It’s an international trade dispute with Canada and Mexico pitted against the U.S. The Americans instituted a new policy some eight years ago requiring that imported livestock, cattle and swine, and all meat products produced from them be labelled with “Country of Origin Labelling” or COOL.

The idea claimed by the U.S was for food safety reasons and that American consumers should know where their food was coming from.  Canada and Mexico protested at the World Trade Organization, saying it was simply protectionist.

Year after year the Americans lost their cases and appeals which they continued rather than change the law.  It was thought they had run out of options and were facing immediate retaliation by Canada in the form of tariffs on American goods.

However the US has now challenged the amount Canada claimed as lost revenue and the case drags on a little longer, costing the Canadian industry over a billion dollars a year.

Marc spoke with Alberta rancher and president of the Canadian Cattlemen’s Association, Dave Solverson who has fought the COOL laws for years.

null
© Council of Canadians

It’s a new law called The Fair Elections Act  but it’s being challenged in Ontario Superior Court in order to ensure as many as 400,000 Canadians will be able to vote in the upcoming federal election.

The Council of Canadians, the Canadian Federation of Students, and three voters are seeking an injunction to suspend key provisions concerning identification requirements, in the Harper government’s recent Fair Elections Act.

Carmel spoke with Dylan Penner, of the Council of Canadians, to find out what’s at stake:

Categories: Uncategorized
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

For reasons beyond our control, and for an undetermined period of time, our comment section is now closed. However, our social networks remain open to your contributions.