Pumpjacks at work pumping crude oil near Halkirk, Alta., on June 20, 2007. (Larry MacDougal/THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Supreme Court rules bankrupt energy companies cannot abandon old wells


Canada’s highest court has ruled that bankrupt energy companies cannot abandon their responsibility to clean up old oil and natural gas wells.

The Supreme Court of Canada’s 5-2 decision released Thursday overturns a decision by the Alberta Court of Appeal that in turn had upheld a 2016 ruling in the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench.

These rulings by the lower courts had effectively allowed a bankruptcy trustee to abandon unprofitable or spent wells owned by an insolvent energy company to pay off creditors with proceeds from the sale of profitable and viable wells when the company’s assets were sold off.

The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the bankruptcy trustee, Grant Thornton Ltd., cannot walk away from its end-of-life obligations to render abandoned wells environmentally safe.

“Bankruptcy is not a licence to ignore rules, and insolvency professionals are bound by and must comply with valid provincial laws during bankruptcy,” Justice Richard Wagner writing for the majority said in the ruling.

The case revolved around the issues raised by the bankruptcy of Redwater Energy, which owned 127 oil and gas assets — wells, pipelines and facilities — and their corresponding licences.

The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that bankrupt energy companies cannot abandon their responsibility to clean up old oil and natural gas wells.
(Sean Kilpatrick/THE CANADIAN PRESS)

In mid‑2014, Redwater began to experience financial difficulties. Grant Thornton Ltd. was appointed as its receiver in 2015. At that time, Redwater owed its creditors approximately $5.1 million and had 84 wells, 7 facilities and 36 pipelines, 72 of which were inactive or spent.

When Redwater became insolvent in 2015, its bankruptcy trustee wanted to sell the firm’s valuable wells to repay debt to its creditors and walk away from the non-producing wells — leaving the clean-up to Alberta’s Orphan Well Association (OWA), an organization funded by the energy industry.

Alberta’s provincial energy regulator ordered Grant Thornton to comply with end-of-life requirements to render the abandoned properties environmentally safe.

Grant Thornton did not comply, and filed its own counterclaim that included a challenge to the regulator’s action, citing the paramountcy of federal bankruptcy law over provincial energy and environmental regulations.

The Supreme Court ruled that the provincial regulations are not in conflict with the federal bankruptcy legislation.

Environmental groups welcome the decision

The Pembina Institute, a non-profit Canadian think-tank, welcomed the high court’s decision.

“The Supreme Court of Canada has prioritized paying clean up costs before creditors when extractive companies go bankrupt,” said in a statement Jody McNeil, analyst at the Pembina Institute.

This outcome reinforces the growing understanding that polluters are responsible for their clean up obligations, she added.

“However, the Supreme Court’s decision does not alleviate broader challenges posed by insolvent operations,” McNeil said. “While the Supreme Court’s decision ensures bankrupt companies’ remaining assets first go to clean up, those assets are often insufficient to cover full costs.”

McNeil said Canadian taxpayers are already on the hook for billions to clean up former minining operations including the Faro Mine in the Yukon, the Giant Mine in the Northwest Territories, and numerous mines in B.C.

“Over the last five decades Alberta’s clean up obligations have steadily grown, and now include over 80,000 inactive oil and gas wells, facilities, and pipelines as well as 1.4 trillion litres in fluid oilsands tailings,” McNeil said. “The Government of Alberta officially estimates it will cost $57 billion to cleanup these sites, though there are ongoing concerns about the accuracy of this figure. Conversely, only $1.2 billion is currently held in securities to protect the public.”

With files from CBC News and The Canadian Press

Categories: Environment, Society
Tags: , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.