@*@ Header
Russian President Vladimir Putin gives an interview to Germany’s Bild newspaper at the Bocharov Ruchei state residence in Sochi, Russia, January 5, 2016.

Russian President Vladimir Putin gives an interview to Germany’s Bild newspaper at the Bocharov Ruchei state residence in Sochi, Russia, January 5, 2016.
Photo Credit: RIA Novosti / Reuters

From Canada with love?

FacebookTwitterGoogle+PinterestEmailPrint

While fresh winds of change are blowing through Canada’s international policy, those winds aren’t likely to lead to any thaw in relations with Russia, says a Canadian expert on foreign policy and military intervention.

Stephen M. Saideman, the Paterson Chair in International Affairs at Carleton University in Ottawa, says, unlike with other foreign affairs files that the Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau inherited from his Conservative predecessor Stephen Harper, he expects little change in Canada’s posture towards Putin’s Russia.

“I don’t think this government came in thinking that the previous government had really messed things up, except for maybe to be more blustery than they would prefer,” Saideman said.

While Canada, with its very large and vocal Ukrainian community numbering over 1.2 million people, was one of the first Western countries to slap on sanctions on Russia and cut all military ties with the Kremlin over its annexation of Crimea and its support for the separatist rebels in eastern Ukraine, the two Arctic neighbours have managed to maintain a cooperative relationship in the north.

“There has been no interruption of Arctic cooperation despite the significant tensions elsewhere over Ukraine,” said Prof Michael Byers, Canada Research Chair in Global Politics and International Law at the University of British Columbia. 

 The Joint Statement officially establishing the Arctic Coast Guard Forum is displayed after being signed at the Coast Guard Academy in New London, Conn., Oct. 30, 2015. The Arctic Coast Guard Forum is an operationally-focused, consensus-based organization with the purpose of leveraging collective resources to foster safe, secure and environmentally responsible maritime activity in the Arctic. Membership includes Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, the Russian Federation and the United States. (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 2nd Class Patrick Kelley)
The Joint Statement officially establishing the Arctic Coast Guard Forum is displayed after being signed at the Coast Guard Academy in New London, Conn., Oct. 30, 2015. © (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 2nd Class Patrick Kelley)

Last fall, representatives all eight circumpolar nations – including Canada, the United States and Russia – signed a historic deal committing their coast guards to cooperate and coordinate their work in the treacherous but increasingly accessible Arctic Ocean.

“First of all, there is a clear mutual interest in continuing Arctic cooperation,” said Byers. “The Arctic is a very remote and very hostile environment where countries cannot accomplish some important things unless they work together.”

But it will be very hard for Canada or the United States and other Western powers to develop positive relations with Russia on other issues as long as Russian President Vladimir Putin continues with his confrontational foreign policy, said Saideman whose research interests focus on the causes and consequences of intervention into intra-state conflicts.

“So for instance, Russia is not just continuing with aggression in Ukraine, it’s also been most confrontational in Syria, its bombing campaign has mostly been aimed at folks that we want to win and not so much at ISIS,” Saideman said. “I think while we can separate these issues and try to work with Russia on discreet Arctic security issues that we have something in common, it’s going to be very hard to do so.”

He expects relations between Russia and Canada to continue to be frozen in the medium term, Saideman said.

 Canadian soldiers practice their shooting skills during Operation UNIFIER, Canada’s military training mission to Ukraine, at the International Peacekeeping and Security Centre (IPSC) in Starychi, Ukraine on December 30, 2015.
Canadian soldiers practice their shooting skills during Operation UNIFIER, Canada’s military training mission to Ukraine, at the International Peacekeeping and Security Centre (IPSC) in Starychi, Ukraine on December 30, 2015. © Joint Task Force Ukraine, DND

“There is not a whole lot Canada can do besides continue to participate in various NATO missions to reassure the countries that are the closest to Russia, which is mostly the Baltics – Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia – but also Hungary, Poland and Romania,” Saideman said. “We continue to do exercises with those countries, we continue to rotate in and out our planes that fly as part of the Baltic air patrol, which is a NATO effort to make sure that these countries have at least a token air cover. And we have to continue our sanctions against the Russian economy.”

While Russia is highly unlikely to succumb to Western pressure to give back Crimea, Saideman said he thinks in longer term Russia can, perhaps, be compelled to end its military support for the rebels in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of eastern Ukraine in exchange for some political influence in Ukraine, which the Kremlin considers vital to its national interests.

And on Syria file the West and Russia are very unlikely to cooperate, Saideman said.

“This is going to be really hard because Russia’s priority is logically opposed to our priorities,” Saideman said. “They want to keep Assad in place and we find that a real problem because Assad is actually the major source of refugee flows, he’s also the major inspiration for ISIS, and it’s not clear that we can get ourselves to victory with Assad in place.”

column-banner-LEVON

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in International

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

5 comments on “From Canada with love?
  1. Ricardo says:

    It seems that this gentleman doesn’t read or heard about the Crimea referendum, where the people answered “YES” to be part of Rusia.

  2. John McDonald says:

    Its absurd to suggest that Putin has designs on the Baltic states or that he is not being helpful in stabilizing the legitimate regime in Syria that is being undermined by the autocratic Arab monarchies and their Turkish ally as part of the proxy war with Iran. What happened in Ukraine was brought about by its unique history and relationship to Russia and the fact that NATO has continuously encroached on Russia’s border and plotted the overthrow of the previous president. The disfunction and corruption of the current Ukraine government is exhibit 1 for the indictment.

  3. yep says:

    what a bunch of BS this israel firster writer says, israel firster want to stsrt ww3 with russia, WHY?, canadians should dump the israel firster USA and make friends with russia, but no we want to start ww3 with russia, ARE YOU PEOPLE MAD ?
    and who will fight russia , it will not ne israel firster children, it will be our children who will die. Most of canadian leadership are israel firster and they are sreaming for ww3 with russia, think about what i just said, period.

  4. khakan says:

    Read your article with interest. It is rather a simplistic analysis of the situation. Your reader would prefer a more in depth analysis.
    Syria is far more complex an issue. American policy in Syria is also complex, as is the anti and pro ISIS policy depending on the geography.
    There is no mention of the real reason why the conflict started. Assad’s humanitarian record may not necessarily the reason.
    Even countries in the region were not interested in destabilising Syria or removing Assad.
    Syria is more than refugee crisis and the creation of Syrian refugees is the direct result of the civil war.