Canadian teacher Neil Bantleman is shown sitting inside a holding cell prior to the start of his trial hearing to listen to the prosecutor’s demand at South Jakarta District Court in Jakarta, Indonesia on March 12, 2015. Foreign Affairs Minister Stephane Dion said the Canadian government *is deeply dismayed and shocked* by an Indonesian Supreme Court decision to overturn the acquittal of Canadian schoolteacher Neil Bantleman.

Canadian teacher Neil Bantleman is shown sitting inside a holding cell prior to the start of his trial hearing to listen to the prosecutor’s demand at South Jakarta District Court in Jakarta, Indonesia on March 12, 2015. Foreign Affairs Minister Stephane Dion said the Canadian government *is deeply dismayed and shocked* by an Indonesian Supreme Court decision to overturn the acquittal of Canadian schoolteacher Neil Bantleman.
Photo Credit: Dita Alangkara

Ottawa ‘appalled’ by Indonesia’s Bantleman verdict


Canada is “deeply dismayed and shocked” by Indonesia’s Supreme Court decision overturning the acquittal of Neil Bantleman and an Indonesian co-defendant, accused of sexually abusing pupils at an international school, Foreign Affairs Minister Stephane Dion says.

An appellate court in August quashed the 10-year sentences given to Bantleman and Ferdinand Tjiong after they were convicted of sexually abusing kindergarten pupils at the Jakarta International School.

But a panel of Supreme Court judges reinstated the original verdicts and increased the jail terms to 11 years, said a spokesman for the high court.

“This decision is unjust, given the many grave irregularities throughout the various proceedings in this case and the fact that all evidence presented by the defence has systematically been rejected,” Dion says.

Despite Canada’s repeated calls for due process, this case was not handled in a fair and transparent manner, he says.

“The outcome of this case has serious implications for Indonesia’s reputation as a safe place for Canadians to work, travel and invest, as well as for Canada’s long history of cooperation with Indonesia,” Dion says.

U.S. condemnation

United States ambassador to Indonesia Robert O. Blake also expressed his “shock” and “disappointed” by the decision.

“The international community continues to closely follow this case,” he said. “The outcome of the legal process will impact international views about the rule of law in Indonesia.”

Neil Bantleman and his wife, Tracy, also a teacher, had travelled to Indonesia together for job opportunities at Jakarta International School (JIS), an upscale private school where about 2,400 students are enrolled.

The US government is a founding partner of the school, renamed the Jakarta Intercultural School, which is attended by children of diplomats, expatriates and members of the Indonesian political and business elites.

Bantleman, 46, and Tjiong was accused of assaulting three kindergarten-aged boys between January 2013 and March 2014.

Bantleman and Tjiong have denied the allegations.

Their lawyers argued that the medical evidence presented by the children’s parents was fabricated and money was the motive.

A 125-million-dollar lawsuit filed by the parents against the school was thrown out by a Jakarta court last year.

Canada will continue to raise the case of Bantleman at the highest levels, Dion says.

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in International, Society

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.


One comment on “Ottawa ‘appalled’ by Indonesia’s Bantleman verdict
  1. Live says:

    I don’t understand what highest level that Dion means, since indonesia – canada doesn’t have a strong relation so far, even in economic relationship. as far i know, Canada never fully open their relationship to indonesia, furthermore Canada never see indonesia as equal partner or as strategic partner. Canada doesn’t have good bargain in this case and Indonesia had nothing to lose. threats and theatrical attractions by minister Dion has no meaning for Indonesia, even only worsen the relationship to the two countries that has been built by previous government. Indonesia always respect other country sovereignty especially on law sovereignty and NEVER intervene them, then why now Canada want to intervene Indonesia’ law sovereignty – where all international community know its against Vienna Convention.