The treatment of Omar Khadr while he was imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay was the basis for the Canadian government’s settlement with him.

The treatment of Omar Khadr while he was imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay was the basis for the Canadian government’s settlement with him.
Photo Credit: U.S. Department of Defense/AP Photo

Governments must learn from Khadr settlement: professor


While Canadians are still bitterly divided over the settlement made to former Guantanamo prisoner Omar Khadr, a professor says his and other cases show that when governments don’t obey the rule of law they must pay.

A recent public opinion survey showed that 71 per cent of Canadians disagreed with the Canadian government’s apology to Omar Khadr and the payment of $10.5 million. Khadr had sued the government for the role Canadian officials played in his incarceration at Guantanamo Bay and the abuse he suffered there.

Canada’s minister of public safety (left) and minister of justice both appeared on July 7, 2017 to explain the settlement with Omar Khadr was based on the rule of law.
Canada’s minister of public safety (left) and minister of justice both appeared on July 7, 2017 to explain the settlement with Omar Khadr was based on the rule of law. © Fred Chartrand/The Canadian Press

Settlement based on rule of law

The government made clear that it settled the case because it had to obey the rule of law. The Supreme Court of Canada had ruled twice that Canadian officials had violated his rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and under international law. This had nothing to do with what Khadr may or may not have done in Afghanistan and everything to do with his treatment for the 10 years he was held at Guantanamo Bay.

During that time the teenager was deprived of sleep, shackled in uncomfortable positions, threatened and held in isolation.

Court warned of government liability

The Supreme Court ruled that “The deprivation of [Khadr’s] right to liberty and security of the person is not in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

“The interrogation of a youth detained without access to counsel, to elicit statements about serious criminal charges while knowing that the youth had been subjected to sleep deprivation and while knowing that the fruits of the interrogations would be shared with the prosecutors, offends the most basic Canadian standards about the treatment of detained youth suspects.”

The court ruling served as a warning to the government that it could be sued by Khadr and indeed it was.

In a similar case, Maher Arar was awarded over $10 million after he was rendered to Syria in 2002 and tortured for two years.
In a similar case, Maher Arar was awarded over $10 million after he was rendered to Syria in 2002 and tortured for two years. © Tom Hanson/Canadian Press/file

Monetary settlement compares to others

Many Canadians have complained about the amount of money that sources have confirmed were paid to Khadr, but it compares with payouts to others in similar situations. In 2002, Canadian officials gave information to U.S. counterparts that resulted in the rendition of Canadian Maher Arar to Syria where he was tortured for two years.

After his return to Canada there was a lengthy inquiry and he was awarded more than 10 million dollars. The United Kingdom has paid hefty settlements to former Guantanamo prisoners who returned there.

The Canadian government also noted that had it not settled with Khadr, the lawsuit would have continued and the government would have had to spend further millions to defend itself.

Paying for ‘some very bad decisions’

There is a lesson to be learned from these cases, says Stephanie Carvin, an assistant professor of international affairs at the University of Ottawa. “All of these settlements…are basically reflecting the fact that we made some very bad decisions in the early part of the war on terror.

“There was this sense that ‘we’re fighting a new foe, a shadowy opponent that doesn’t respect the rules, that we have to take the gloves off, that we can’t apply international law.’ And every time we’ve done that we end up paying more money, we’ve ended up in these lengthy court battles and there’s no indication that any of the short cuts that we tried to take did anything to make us safer.”

Concludes Carvin, “The Charter (of Rights and Freedoms) rules and (governments should not) try to take shortcuts.”

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in International, Society

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.