Across Canada, some parents are confused about what school report cards are saying about their children's progress.
Photo Credit: CBC

Parents giving low grades to some province’s school report cards

Share

As the school year has ended, parents in some areas across Canada are increasingly frustrated with their children’s report cards, which are being modernized.

null
Calgary Alberta schools will try a new type of report for kindergarten through grade-9 © CBC

As education is a provincial jurisdiction in Canada, there are variations in curriculums and procedures across the country, and even within various provincial school boards.

In east coast Nova Scotia, where final report cards were issued last week, some parents are saying the report cards are filled with “mumbo jumbo”

Report cards in the Halifax regional school board are restricted to comments about “learning outcomes” — education jargon for curriculum-based goals.

As an example of a comment on a child’s progress in mathematics, the report might say that a student “can calculate the products of two decimals” or “continues to work toward mastering appropriate strategy selections” for mental math.

Parent, Amy Lawlor, who had a son in primary school in Timberlea, said she and her husband were baffled by her son’s report card.

Speaking to a reporter she noted, “I said to my husband after I read it, ‘I have no idea how he’s doing in school,’”   Ms Lawlor added, “Great, so he’s demonstrated achievement. Uh-huh. Awesome. Does that mean he’s doing really well?”  She continued, “Is ‘demonstrates achievement’ better or worse than ‘has met outcomes?’ I have no idea. It’s frustrating for us.”

Nova Scotia deputy minister of Education, Carole Olsen said electronic templates used to write report cards were developed by school boards, not the Education Department. Department guidelines

Departmental guidelines state that report card comments shouldn’t contain jargon or “complex technical language” and should address students’ learning needs.

But another parent, Marshall Hamilton who has five children in four different schools says such “canned” phrases are not helpful.

He says children need to understand where they’ve failed, and where they’ve succeeded and what they need to do to improve. He says, “The end result is we don’t have a clear picture(…) we don’t know how she’s measuring up”.

The president of the Nova Scotia Teachers Union, Shelley Morse  says teachers don’t have a choice. They’re told to keep it academically based, and personal comments don’t belong. She says, ““It is a cookie-cutter approach to reporting and it’s based on the outcomes. … So if parents are saying that they don’t understand them, I can completely understand why.”

Meanwhile in western Canada,  some public schools in Calgary Alberta are going to experiment with a new type of report card for kindergarten to Grade-9.

The plan is to produce only 2 report cards a year instead of three, and traditional marks will be replaced with learning outcome ratings.

Performance will be rated as, exemplary, evident, emerging, or support required.  The Calgary Board of Education is also considering dropping the personal comments portion.

Failing grades will be listed as “support required” and if progress improved they will be listed as “emerging”.

Jeff Bowes, who is the head of the Association of Parent and School Councils, finds this worrisome.

“We have concerns about the removal of comments from report cards. Personally, I find the comments often have the most valuable information on the report card,” he said.

However, school trustee Carol Bazinet, says parents don’t have to rely so much on report cards to find out how their child is doing. She says with emails and other online information, they can have closer contact with teachers to find the information they want.

In Manitoba, standardized report cards will be used in all public schools by the fall of 2013,

The report cards will use grade scales that are already being used in many schools:

Students in Grades 1 to 6 will be marked on a four-point numeric scale for each subject category. Students in Grades 7 to 12 will have marks expressed in percentages. In Grades 9 to 12, report cards will also have a chart showing how many graduation requirements the student has fulfilled.

The report cards will also feature a section in which teachers can note a student’s behaviour, separate from his or her academic grade.

null
Manitoba Education Minister Nancy Allen, explains the new the new provincial standardized report. She says it will do away with vague jargon like “meeting expectations” © CBC

After initial testing and based on comments from parents, the report cards were revised to the new format.

Education Minister Nancy Allen said the new report cards will do away with educational jargon such as “meeting expectations” or “not meeting expectations”.

Ontario, which is Canada’s most populous province, began changing it’s report cards in 2010.

It includes a progress report instead of report card in the autumn, and then two  actual report cards.

For Elementary school grades, the Progress Report does not have letter grades or percentage marks.  It gives and early indication of a child’s general progress and reports on how well your child is developing important learning skills and work habits.  For academic subjects like math, language and science, it tells whether your child is progressing “very well”, “well” or “with difficulty”.

The progress report however, does include comments from the teacher .  Report Cards are issued in February and at the end of the school year in June. It uses letter grades for Grades 1 – 6 and percentage marks for Grades 7 – 8, for each subject.

Like the Elementary Progress Report, Report Cards  report on a child’s Learning Skills and Work Habits.  Teacher comments will focus on your child’s strengths, and next steps for improvement for learning.

The “Learning Skills and Work Habits” for  Ontario students from Grades 1 through 12, include ratings on, “responsibility, organization, independent work, collaboration, initiative, and self-regulation” and are reported as either “Excellent, Good, Satisfactory or Needs Improvement”.

 

Share
Categories: Society
Tags:

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*