Link hosts: Lynn Desjardins, Marc Montgomery, Levon Sevunts

Link hosts: Lynn Desjardins, Marc Montgomery, Levon Sevunts
Photo Credit: RCI

the LINK Online, Sat. 06 Feb., 2016


Your hosts, Lynn, Levon, Marc

Khadye Beye

This week a special appearance from Khadye Beye, who is our web editor.

She is putting together a website specifically geared to black history month, celebrated every February in Canada, the US, and Britain.

She came into our studios for a quick chat with Marc about the new special section on the RCI website, and some of the interesting and too little known stories connected with black history in Canada, past and present.


Canadian newpapers have been hard hit by declining advertising revenues, as have other media. © Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press

These are tough times to be a journalist in Canada.  Some newspapers have closed down, as have some radio operations, and many newspapers, radio, and TV stations have been merged into bigger corporate entities, and news staff severely reduced.

Thousands have lost their jobs.

All this is bad news for democracy according to one analyst. Lawrence Martin is a columnist at the respected Globe and Mail newspaper, He is also the author of several books on politics.  “We have a situation in Canada where we have less journalists bringing less news to people and less controversies and less scandal. That is not what you want in a healthy democracy.”

Lynn spoke to Mr Martin about the situation.


Britain’s fertility regulator has approved a scientist’s request to edit the human genetic code in an effort to fight inherited diseases, but critics say it crosses ethical boundaries.
Britain’s fertility regulator has approved a scientist’s request to edit the human genetic code in an effort to fight inherited diseases, but critics say it crosses ethical boundaries. © Shutterstock-via CBC

When cloning was first made possible, it caused a great deal of  controversy. A new technology is at least as controversial, if not more so.

Its acronym is CRISPR, and it’s a relatively new discovery, a major breakthrough in fact, that enables gene editing to be done more accurately, faster, easier, and cheaper.

The concern is that editing the genes of an embryo could lead to designer babies, and a permanent change in the evolution of human genes.

There are of course great things that could be done with this, but scientists held a huge international meeting last year to recommend a “go slow” approach. This week however, Britain granted what is believed to be, the first permit allowing research using a human embryo.

In an edited conversation Marc spoke with Timothy Caulfield, a lega expert in the medical field at the University of Alberta.(full interview available in “highlights”)


Bear #122 feeds on a moose carcass at Banff National Park. © Dan Ralfa/Parcs Canada

When humans are attacked by large carnivores, say, cougars, lions, bears, etc. whose fault is it really?

A new study in the online journal Nature, found that about half of such attacks inthe last 60 years, is due to human behaviour, and the simple fact of not being observant of one’s surroundings.

In this edited version Levon spoke with with Stephen Herrero, one of the co-authors of the study, a professor emeritus at the University of Calgary and one of the world’s leading experts on bears.  The full interview is in the highlights section

Photos of the week

Highlights from some of the stories of the past week.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.