An Indian girl wearing a mask participates in rally to mark the 71st anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima in Mumbai, India, Saturday, Aug.6, 2016. The Aug. 6, 1945, bombing killed 140,000 people. Another atomic bombing three days later in Nagasaki killed more than 70,000 people.
Photo Credit: AP / Rajanish Kakade

World Social Forum gets underway in Montreal


The World Social Forum 2016 is happening in Montreal this week, the first time the gathering has taken place in a North American city. The inaugural edition was held in Porto Alegre, Brazil, in 2001.

This is the 12th edition of the gathering that unites “groups in civil society, organizations and social movements who want to build a sustainable and inclusive world” as it says on the website. And this year nuclear disarmament is one of the key issues on the agenda.

Gordon Edwards is the head of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility. He described the poignancy of the subject as the day began with a memorial to the victims of the Nagasaki atomic bomb, on this the day before the 71st anniversary.


“In the year before the dropping of that bomb there was a secret laboratory here in Montreal where in fact scientists from Canada, Britain and France, were studying the best ways of making plutonium for bombs so there is a direct connection with Montreal in that sense.” Edwards said.

The beginning of the day also included a Mohawk delegation of Elders from the traditional council of the Mohawk community of Kahnawake, just across the river from Montreal. The elders talked about how “out of kilter” the world has become, and the danger of nuclear weapons and facilities, and the potential for such widespread destruction and death.

The forum is focusing nuclear issues this year because of the renewed political tensions in the world. Gordon Edwards says that despite progress in the past to reduce nuclear arsenals, there is a move now to spend “huge amounts of money in reconstituting and in fact modernizing the nuclear arsenals; this does not bode well for the planet.” he says.

“The USA alone is contemplating spending a trillion dollars in modernizing these weapons of mass destruction” 

Gordon Edwards says “it seems to be question of urgency because we’re turning a corner here and it’s a very dangerous corner. Instead of getting safer and safer we’re heading towards a world where it’s getting more and more dangerous.”

The International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War describe nuclear capability as an “addiction” according to Edwards. He says the group, which won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985, and included the private physicians of both Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev; describe the insanity of knowing that “a war fought with nuclear weapons is a war without any winners at all”. And yet they cannot kick the addiction.

Edwards will be attending the series of 12 workshops at McGill’s McConnell Engineering building covering all the current nuclear issues. He said an interesting talk this morning by Arnie Gunderson, someone who has worked on the inside and the outside of the industry, drew attention to the fact that nuclear power is not the solution suppliers suggest it is.

Categories: Economy, Environment, International

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.