A humpback whale’s tail comes out of the water during a ride on the Les Ecumeurs boat on the St. Lawrence river at Les Escoumins, Quebec, August 13, 2009.

A humpback whale’s tail comes out of the water during a ride on the Les Ecumeurs boat on the St. Lawrence river at Les Escoumins, Quebec, August 13, 2009.
Photo Credit: Mathieu Belanger

Environmental groups slam government plans to allow oil and gas drilling in proposed marine protected area


Environmental groups are blasting the Liberal government’s plan to allow oil and gas exploration in a proposed marine protected area off the southwest coast of Newfoundland and Labrador in the Atlantic Ocean.

The Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada released an impact statement last Friday on its Laurentian Channel protected area, a 11,619-square-kilometre swath of ocean where the Gulf of St. Lawrence meets the Atlantic Ocean. The plan calls for limiting commercial activity in the area in order to protect vulnerable marine life.

The establishment of the marine protected area (MPA) is part of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s promise to increase the proportion of Canada’s marine and coastal areas that are protected to 10 per cent of Canada’s coastal waters by 2020. The Laurentian Channel MPA would provide protection to an additional 0.2 per cent of Canada’s oceans, the DFO document said.

The proposed Marine Protected Area covers a 11,619-square-kilometre swath of ocean where the Gulf of St. Lawrence meets the Atlantic Ocean, off the southwest coast of Newfoundland and Labrador. (Source: Integrated Coastal and Ocean Management (ICOM) Newfoundland and Labrador)

Under the proposed regulations the DFO plans establish two different management zones within the MPA, with varying levels of protection in each one.

The regulations would prohibit certain human activities, such as oil and gas development, submarine cable installation and anchoring, within a “core protection zone” where the ecosystem features and functions of the area are susceptible to their impacts, according to the DFO document.

However, the government plans to allow commercial activities, including oil and gas exploration, within the so-called “adaptive management zone” because “they would not significantly impact the conservation objectives,” the document states.

The core protection zone (CPZ) would comprise two spatially distinct areas (Zone 1a and Zone 1b) that are strict protection zones. They are designed to provide the highest level of protection to areas containing high concentrations of coral and sea pens. The only activities that would be allowed within the CPZ are activities for public safety and national security; Aboriginal food, social and ceremonial fisheries; and marine navigation (excluding anchoring) (Source: DFO)

That leaves about 80 per cent of the MPA open to oil and gas exploration and exploitation, argue environmental groups.

“We are extremely concerned,” said David Miller, president and CEO of World Wildlife Fund-Canada. “If you look at national parks on land, they do not allow for extractive activities like drilling for oil and gas in a national park and I think people can understand why. If you’re trying to protect an area because it’s important for an ecosystem, you have to protect the entire system.”

The Laurentian Channel is a critical migration route for some of our most endangered whales, including humpback and minke whales, as well as endangered blue whales and endangered North Atlantic right whales, and oil and gas exploration and extraction threatens them with noise pollution, habitat disturbance and physical injury from seismic blasting, Miller said.

(click to listen to the interview with David Miller)


Sabine Jessen, National Ocean Program Director at the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS), said they too are very concerned that DFO would recommend regulations allowing oil and gas activities to continue in a marine protected area.

“Laurentian Channel is an ecological gem that will suffer irreparable harm if oil and gas activities are allowed,” Jessen said in a statement on Friday.

A government spokeswoman suggested the government is willing to listen and plans to achieve its goal “through sound science and transparent decision-making, and in meaningful consultation with Canadians.”

“We look forward to listening to what Canadians have to say about the proposed Laurentian Channel Marine Protected Area, which aims to protect and conserve important species and habitat so that they can be enjoyed by generations to come,” Laura Gareau, a spokeswoman for Fisheries and Oceans Minister Dominic LeBlanc, said in an e-mailed statement Friday.

“Only activities that are determined to be compatible with the conservation objectives of this MPA would be allowed,” she added.

No oil and gas activity is taking place in this area right now, Gareau said.

“If that’s the case, then this should be an easy one, where the decision is very clearly to protect this very important and fragile ecosystem” said Miller.

WWF-Canada hopes the regulations will get changed if there is enough pressure on the government from concerned Canadians, Miller said.

The government is committed to consultations and encourages Canadians to get involved in the process, Gareau said.

“All input will be taken into account when finalizing this Marine Protected Area,” she said.

Categories: Environment
Tags: , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available


3 comments on “Environmental groups slam government plans to allow oil and gas drilling in proposed marine protected area
  1. I am in favour of protecting the whole CORE PROTECTION ZONE..you cannot pick little pieces of it ..the sensitivity of these mammals is key to their survival.. And our acknowledgement of that.. No to oil and gas and any other invasive corporation greed takeover.. Look at sustainable energy..NOW..
    I live on HORNBY island on the Salish sea..in BC ..western canada and we are also fighting for our preservation of this Salish sea..against pipelines and natural gas exploration.. These are sensitive zones and must be protected.. PROTECT OUR OCEANS ..

  2. Avatar Ken Crozier says:

    The Core Protection Zone must be protected from oil drilling and gas exploration in order to safeguard our marine wildlife, especially the range of endangered Whale species, which live and feed in the area. This is a no brainer. As a Marine Protected Area, the Laurentian Channel must be protected now and in the future.

    Ken Crozier

  3. Avatar Bernard Hart says:

    I am very much in favor of the protected area outlined above. This will also be a signal to the rest of the World that we are willing to do our share in the protection of our environment.