Five factories were housed in the Rana Plaza building which collapsed in Bangladesh on April 24, 2018. More than 1,000 workers were killed and 2,500 more were injured. (A.M.Ahad/AP Photo/file)

Safety improved for many, but not all Bangladeshi garment workers


Two retail company initiatives have led to much improved safety conditions in some clothing factories in Bangladesh but a new report suggests more should be done. Canadian companies like Loblaw, Hudson’s Bay and YM Inc. were central to the initiatives that put pressure on factory owners after the Rana Plaza factory collapse killed 1,134 workers and injured over 2,500 others in April 2013.

On April 25, 2013, people worked hard to rescue survivors from the rubble of the Rana Plaza garment factory building. (Kevin Frayer/AP Photo/file)

Multiple failures led to disaster

Paul Barrett, deputy director of The Center for Business and Human Rights at New York University says this disaster was among several factory accidents with multiple causes.

“You had a failure to regulate or oversee garment factories. You had a lot of corruption which undercut whatever regulation was taking place. And you had irresponsibility by factory owners who didn’t invest in safety precautions and instead used substandard materials, poor designs, put their factories in buildings that were not designed to house industrial activity,” said Barrett.

“And when you mix all those things together you ended up with a series of fires and building collapses over a period of years that culminated in the Rana Plaza disaster.”

Paul Barrett

Paul Barrett co-authored the report entitled “Five Years After Rana Plaza.”


Brands, retailers demanded improvements

After photos of the disaster circulated around the world, several companies which had sourced product from Rana Plaza launched the two initiatives. They put together funds for factory inspections and to compile lists of necessary safety improvements. That produced tangible results.

“These initiatives which were formed by western clothing brands and retailers turned to the factory owners and said ‘you must complete these steps to make your factories safer or we will not do business with you anymore,’” noted Barrett. “So, a factory stood to lose all of its western business—Europe, North America—if it didn’t comply. And that pressure applied had a good effect causing things to change.”

On June 14, 2013, a Bangladeshi woman hold a picture of her son who was a garment worker and was missing after the collapse of the Rana Plaza building. Images like this prompted action. (Kevin Frayer/AP Photo/file)

Pressure yielded results

The report shows that pressure made a difference in about 2,300 factories where safety has improved for some two million workers. But it notes there are other factories in Bangladesh that were not affected by this initiative and remain unsafe. Some supply Asian countries. Others are smaller and fly under the radar.

A call for an international effort

So, the report recommends the creation of a Bangladeshi-led international task force focused on “shared responsibility” for factory safety. It calls for funding from the brands and retailers that profit from Bangladeshi apparel, governments whose citizens purchase inexpensive clothing made in the country, international financial institutions, and the philanthropic community so that “the task force can start to make all factories safer.”

Categories: International, Society
Tags: , , , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.


One comment on “Safety improved for many, but not all Bangladeshi garment workers
  1. Avatar Peter Ashcroft says:

    The Bangladeshi Government must have, and implement, safety standards at all their factories, irrespective whether they supply internal or export markets. Regular checks are therefore necessary.