Protesters against Enbridge's proposed Northern Gateway pipeline are shown gathering outside the Joint Review Panel's final argument hearings in Terrace, B.C., in June 2013. A B.C. civil liberties group says documents show that police and CSIS conducted unconstitutional and possibly illegal actions by gathering information on peaceful activists who opposed the pipeline. (Robin Rowland/CP)

Challenge to spy agency collection of data on peaceful protest movement


A legal advocacy group, the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA) is crying foul. It has publicly released documents showing heavy censorship of Canada’s spy agency reports on the activities of peaceful protesters against a proposed pipeline project.

They say the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) action in collecting and keeping such information is beyond its mandate, and illegal. They are in court first to seek access to the blacked out information in the reports.

Paul Champ(LLb), of the firm Champ and Associates,  is a the lead lawyer for the BCCCLA in this case.

Lawyer Paul Champ on the legal challenge regarding CSIS information on peaceful protesters

The case stems from protests against a proposed project called the Northern Gateway Pipeline.  That project was later abandoned, but the spy agency collected information and filed hundreds of reports on individuals and groups who were against the project.

Enbridge’s now defunct proposed Northern Gateway pipeline route for crude oil through northern B.C. and oil tanker routes through coastal waters (Canadian Press)

Quoted in the Canadian Press, Champ said, “”[It] raises concerns that this isn’t about national security, but it’s about protecting the economic interests of Canada’s energy sector and, in our view, that’s completely beyond CSIS’ mandate”.

The first complaint about “spying” was filed in 2014 with the spy agency’s oversight group, but that was rejected when the Security Intelligence Review Committee (SIRC|)said the agency collected the information only indirectly as a by-product of investigations into legitimate threats. After hearing from many witnesses on both sides of the case, it’s 2017 decision was that CSIS had acted within its mandate.

The court action is to reveal the information that has been blacked out to determine exactly to what extent CSIS may or may not have exceeded its mandate.

Although CSIS testified it is not in the business of investigating people because th they are  advocating for an environmental cause, Champ says the mere idea that someone advocating in a legal way for a cause could end up with their names and a variety of personal information in a security database is having a “chilling” effect on some people. He says at some unknown point in the future their may be unexpected consequences such as being denied on flights as an example.

Champ feels the issue of clarification or relevation of some or all of the redacted text may take another year in the courts, while the larger issue of the legality of CSIS collecting data on peaceful protesters and organisations may take another three years.

Champ says that while this case centres on activities connected with the now defunct Northern Gateway Pipeline and protests, an eventual ruling on CSIS activities would likely have far greater implications on intelligence gathering related to peaceful political dissent in future

Additional information

Categories: Uncategorized
Tags: , , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet Netiquette guidelines.

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


One comment on “Challenge to spy agency collection of data on peaceful protest movement
  1. Avatar James Vandenblink says:

    I’s high time to cancel the Trans Mountain Pipeline as well.
    That won’t happen with 2-face Justin in power (one face for the Paris accord, the other one for business as usual) nor will it happen under a P.C. regime.
    The Koch brothers just would never stand for it.
    They pay the piper who plays the tune!