A Canadian family has filed a complaint in the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal against the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board, their daughter’s former teacher and the principal of the school for teaching her there are no such things as girls or boys. (iStock)

Parents sue school board for teaching their daughter ‘girls are not real’

Share

A Canadian couple have filed a human rights complaint against an Ontario school board for telling their six-year-old daughter during a lesson on gender identity that “there’s no such thing as boys and girls.”

Pamela and Jason Buffone have filed the complaint on behalf of their daughter against the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board, the child’s former teacher and the principal of her school on grounds of discrimination on the basis of sex, gender and gender identity in contravention of the Human Rights Code.

An amended application filed last week by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, which is representing the young girl and her parents, also notes that the child’s rights to security of the person and equality under sections 7 and 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms have also been infringed, said Lisa Bildy, a staff lawyer with the centre.

Pamela Buffone told Radio Canada International she knew something was wrong when her six-year-old daughter (who’s being referred to as “NB” to protect her identity) demanded to know why her teacher was telling the class that “girls are not real and boys are not real.”

It all began in January of 2018, when a new teacher, Janine Blouin, took over their daughter’s class, Buffone said.

“She was very passionate about all kinds of social justice topics, most of which our daughter really enjoyed learning about,” Buffone said.

Gender identity lessons in first grade

One day, Blouin showed the class a YouTube video entitled, “He, She, and They?!? – Gender: Queer Kid Stuff #2”.

The video, produced by Queer Kid Stuff, an LGBTQ+ and social justice webseries for children, discussed the concept of gender identity, and asserted that “some people aren’t boys or girls” and that those who do not feel like a “she” or a “he” might not have a gender.

During another lesson, Blouin drew a gender spectrum on the board and asked each student to identify where they fit on the spectrum. NB indicated that she was on the furthest end of the spectrum marked “girl.” Blouin then told the class that “girls are not real, and boys are not real,” the human rights complaint alleges.

‘Extremely upsetting and unsettling’

This was extremely upsetting and unsettling for their daughter, Buffone said.

“At the age of six she was just figuring out that animals are divided into boys and girls; when she met a new dog on the street, for example, she would ask ‘is it a boy or a girl?’,” Buffone said. “So she was very confused by what her teacher was saying and was struggling to understand what it meant for her as a girl.”

Buffone said following the lessons her daughter stated that she was not sure if she wanted to be a mommy when she grew up, and asked if she could “go to the doctor” to do something about the fact that she is a girl.

Buffone said she asked for a meeting with Blouin to understand what she was teaching and why, and to raise her concern with her about the appropriateness of the lessons given her daughter’s questions and reaction.

The teacher suggested they take it up with the school principal, which they did, Buffone said.

“They were very convinced they were doing the right thing and they did everything they could to try to convince us that they knew what they were doing,” Buffone said. “When we tried to raise our concerns that the lessons weren’t factual or age-appropriate, they just pointed to their policies, the specialist they have on staff, the training that they had had.”

Lingering effects

No one seemed interested in understanding why the family was concerned or what the impact of the lessons had been on their daughter or on the other children in the class, Buffone said.

“I was astonished that this was such a one-way conversation and they did everything they could to dismiss our concerns and get us to fall in line with this kind of instruction,” Buffone said. “It’s extremely concerning to me that people in positions of authority who are supposed to be looking out for the welfare of all children have zero interest in understanding the impact of their lessons on very young children.”

Ultimately the family decided to move their daughter to another school, but even after moving to the new school the young girl was upset and unsettled by her experience, Buffone said.

“I was surprised at how much it affected her because she kept raising it to us in different ways even after she started at a new school,” Buffone said. “She was very confused about why her teacher would be saying things like that, but she seems to be doing much better now that she’s out of that environment.”

Discrimination ‘on the basis of sex and gender’

In March of 2019, the family filed a formal application to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO).

Last week, Bildy filed an amended application claiming that Blouin discriminated against the little girl “on the basis of sex and gender identity by using the authoritative platform of a teacher to publicly deny the existence of the female gender and biological sex, and to undermine the value of being biologically female and identifying as a female.”

“My daughter was discriminated against because of her gender identity and sex as a female,” Buffone said. “We want the school to understand how this was discriminatory, and to take steps to refrain from treating other gender-conforming children this way in the future. I also want them to stop teaching the idea that boys and girls don’t exist.”

If the school board can accommodate the inclusion of trans and other gender identities into the classroom setting, then surely they can accommodate the inclusion of children who experience no discord between their biology and their sense of self, Bildy said.

Among other things, the family is asking the tribunal to force the school board to stop “teaching gender theory in any manner which suggests that sex categories of male and female do not exist, or are fluid, or exist on a spectrum,” she added.

“To teach otherwise cannot be anything but discrimination on the basis of sex, which is a protected ground,” said Bildy. “If we cannot describe the physical reality of biological sex, then women can no longer defend their human rights as women.

‘A pedagogical experiment’

Kenneth Zucker, a professor of developmental psychology who specializes in gender dysphoria, said the school board’s foray into gender education amounts to “a pedagogical social experiment” where teachers and other educators are providing information to children of various ages about very complex topics.

“What it brings to mind for me are a few issues,” Zucker told Radio Canada International. “Number one, what is the actual qualification of teacher like ‘JB’ to be exposing children to this type of information?”

Zucker, who has more than forty years of experience as a clinical psychologist and university professor, said the teacher is alleged to have made some bizarre statements to children.

“It’s as if this teacher is exposing kids to post-modern social constructionist theory that you would teach to undergraduates at university,” Zucker said.

Another question that’s being raised by this case is how one vets these kinds of lessons in schools, Zucker said.

“One parameter that I think is very important to keep in mind is that children are not all the same,” Zucker said. “And some children might feel much more vulnerable and confused by what they are hearing.”

While one of the underlying goals of gender education is to make children who are gender non-conforming or who have clinically significant gender dysphoria be acknowledged and supported by teachers, it’s not clear that the current system is the way to go, Zucker said.

“As a scientist, one of the things I would want to know is how the school boards evaluate the effectiveness of what they are teaching kids,” Zucker said. “What is it exactly that they would like the kids to come to understand? How is that evaluated? And also are they evaluating any indicators of let’s call them adverse side-effects of this type of pedagogy?”

There is very little empirical evidence to see how these types of educational lessons affect children, Zucker said.

‘Safe and caring programs’

The Ottawa-Carleton District School Board (OCDSB) said in a written statement that they will be responding through the tribunal’s process, but in light of the current legal proceedings, they are not able to comment on the particulars of this case.

“The OCDSB is committed to providing inclusive, safe and caring programs for all students,” the statement said. “Our equity and inclusive education policy is grounded in honouring the human rights and dignity of all persons and commits to reducing barriers that impact equity of access and opportunity for all students.”

In addition, the OCDSB has a guide to support administrators and educators on gender identity and gender expression, the statement added.

No date has been set yet for a hearing.

Share
Categories: Society
Tags: , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

*

7 comments on “Parents sue school board for teaching their daughter ‘girls are not real’
  1. Avatar J Drapeau says:

    Who vets are educators to prevent such propaganda from these extremist individuals in positions of authority trying to force their marginalised (and nonsensical) agenda on society, and victimising children in the process

  2. Avatar Laurie Lyon says:

    It’s frighteningly amazing to watch a social contagion spread in real time. 2 sexes, 3 sexual orientations and those are all the facts of the so called spectrum. Everything else is complete nonsense.

    What is happening to girls and women is especially detrimental.

    Boys (Trans Identified Boys) in girls bathrooms and lockers rooms, allowed to shower and change right next to them. Boys sexually assaulting girls in these spaces have increased. Boys taking girls sports and the awards and scholarships away from them.

    Men (Trans Identified Males) entitled to occupy our private intimate spaces such as bathrooms, locker rooms, changing rooms and the voyeurism and sexual assaults have increased in these spaces as a result of this madness. Serial rapist and murdering men placed in general population in women’s prisons. Imagine being the woman who has to share a cell with this scum of the earth POS. Woke society and government policy telling women they aren’t allowed women only refuges/shelters from men. Men answering rape hotline phone calls because they “feel” like a woman. Men joining women’s sports and displacing women from the wins women have worked hard for.

    Men, Boys (Trans Identified Males) displacing girls and women from female only positions created by and for females. All of this diminishes/displaces/removes women’s rightful citizenship place in society.

    Notice none of this is having an affect on Males. There are very little to none complaints coming from males about females identifying as male. WHY??? BECAUSE FEMALES ARE NOT A THREAT TO MALES!!!!!!! DUH. Also females who identify as male are not pushing their agenda onto males. Not with the same aggression and force and noise as Males who Identify as female.

  3. Avatar MB says:

    Kenneth Zucker is the worst sort of “expert” to consult of childhood gender dysphoria, since he has made a career of denying it exists and trying to force children to conform to their biological gender

  4. Avatar Louis E. says:

    I fear that the parents will now be targeted by trans-activists who pretend any attempt to correct the lies they and their government enablers have co-opted schools to teach is hatred for their persons.The baseless ideology behind “gender identity” is treated as an orthodoxy enforced in a manner reminiscent of theocracies.The legal protections the “trans” have received for their delusional “identities” are bad public policy…when people’s desires are not consistent with their needs,government has a duty to care only about their needs,regardless of claims that it is hatred or oppression to frustrate their irrational desires.

  5. Avatar Dorothy says:

    I big THANK YOU to the Buffone’s for bringing this to court. Parents have no idea what is being taught and what passes as education in the classroom these days. Non-scientific ideological lies have no place in the classroom and will only confuse children at such a young age. Good luck! I hope the courts will see reality, rationality and common sense in this case.

  6. Avatar Peter Ashcroft says:

    Boys and girls are compatible and equal, but not identical. There may be minor variations, but this should be treated as such, and not emphasized.

  7. Avatar S Kaltner says:

    Nice move. Thank you. Ideology has no place in schools.