2011 Green Bay's Aaron Rodgers, left, and Pittsburgh's Ben Roethlisberger. The much hyped US Super Bowl is one of America's greatest games. but the US game came about thanks to Canadian rules.
Photo Credit: Getty Images- via CBC

History- May 14, 1874 How Canada created American football

Share

Though American websites seldom, if ever, mention it, and American sportscasters probably don’t know it either, the origins of another of their greatest professional sports had come from Canada.

While Canadian James Naismith invented basketball, American style “football” also came  from Canada, after Americans played a game developed in Canada.

American sports history often cites an 1869 game between Rutgers University and Princeton as the origin of their game of “football”, but that was a rather different style of game which bore little resemblance to what we call football today, including for example, having 25 players per side. Its only real claim to fame is the start of intercollegiate sports.In the latter part of the 1800’s both the US and Canadian universities were playing a soccer-like rugby brought over from England. However the sport had evolved somewhat in the new world, and also evolved rather differently in the two countries.

What is now known as one of the Americans greatest professional sports, thus came about as a result of American exposure to the Canadian version of the sport.

In 1874, the American Harvard University team was seeking to play against another university team and invited McGill University in Montreal to play against them. However, by this time the American and Canadian versions of rugby-football were substantially different.

null
Alleged to be a photo of one of the two games between Harvard and McGill, which became the start of the US style of football. © Notman photo- Archives McGill

Thus the decision was made to have the teams play two games, one by Harvard’s American rules, and one game played by Canadian rulews.

On May 13 and 14, in 1874 two games were played in the US. The first was played using Harvard’s rules, which was a game more like soccer and using a round ball, the second was played using McGill rules, with an oblong ball.

The Harvard game was a soccer variation known as the “Boston Game.” This allowed a player to pick up the ball and run with it if he were chased, but if the persuer stopped he would yell to the ball-holder who then had to throw or kick the ball.

As it turned out the Americans won the first game 3-0, while the second game with Canadian rules was a scoreless tie.

However, much more importantly for the US and today’s extravangas like the Super Bowl, and all the others. the Harvard squad enjoyed the Canadian game better.

The Canadian team could also only field 11 players at the match, whereas the Americans usually played with 15 members (or more) on the field. Even today, American football only puts 11 members per team on the field.

They Harvard team liked the Canadian innovations to the game such as running with the ball, downs, forward passing, goal posts for a try, or touchdown, and tackling.  They adopted the Canadian rules and they then introduced them into a match with Yale the following year.

American sources tend to cite this all US game as the start of American football, ignoring the fact that Canada was the source of the Harvard game.

It also marked the first time admission was charged to a college sporting event, with a 50 cent fee for spectators, which apparently would be used post game for “entertaining” the visiting Canadian team.   American college football now generates well over a billion of dollars in revenue every year.

In 1876 a formalized rulebook was created by US colleges as the new sport took a much different route from the sports of soccer and rugger (rugby), but one which had been very much influenced by the Canadian innovations.

Share
Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in International, Society

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

7 comments on “History- May 14, 1874 How Canada created American football
  1. nim says:

    when did it start

  2. Jeff Hammond says:

    Almost always typical of Americans to take credit for something they did not create. They tend to not pay much attention to countries other than their own.

  3. James says:

    Who invented it? What was their name?

  4. Your version of this story perpetuates a popular misconception. The term “football” actually refers to two different sports.

    The term “football” that is used in England (and most of the world outside of North America) refers to “Association Football”, which is commonly known as “soccer” in North America.

    The term “football” that is used in North America, originated from rugby-football, a game played with an oval ball that can either be picked up and run with, as well as passed or kicked.

    The 1869 game between Princeton and Rutgers was “Association Football”, or soccer, a kicking game played with a round ball. Running with the ball and passing the ball is not permitted. It is not “football” as we know the term in North America.

    In 1874, the three games played between McGill and Harvard (two in May, one in October) were rugby-football, which involved kicking, throwing (laterals) and running with the ball.

    If you are in England and talk to someone about “football”, they think you are referring to “soccer”. If you are in North America and use the tern “football”, it is not “soccer”.

    Similarly with the term “hockey”. When using that term outside of North America, it is generally assumed to be “field hockey”. But when used in North America, especially in Canada, the term is generally assumed to be referring to ice hockey.

    You state in this article that: “In the latter part of the 1800’s both the US and Canadian universities were playing a soccer-like rugby brought over from England.”

    This statement is a contradiction because there is no such thing as “soccer-like rugby”. Soccer is the kicking game played with a round ball. Rugby is the passing, kicking, rushing game played with the oval ball. both are known as football, depending upon which country you are in.

    • Marc Montgomery Marc Montgomery says:

      Thank you for your comment.

      You are correct about the 1869 game, however some American sources list this as the first “football” game, perhaps from their own misconception about the term football (Association football=soccer) in England and Europe and what constitutes “football” in North America.

      I said “soccer-like football” in this later event, as the Americans from what I found in limited research due to extreme time restraints available to write the story- is that the Americans were playing a version of rugby that did not quite resemble British rugby, (which itself seems to have developed only a short time earlier) and in which they used a round soccer ball and so more kicking was done, like soccer.

      At the time Harvard were playing according to “Boston” rules, while other US universities were playing a game with still different rules and as many as 25 players on a side.

      If you look at the Notman photo, it does appear to be a more rugby-style scrimmage. There unfortunately is no indication of which of the two 1874 games this was, ie, playing by American or Canadian rules. The fact remains that the Americans in 1874 adopted some of the Canadian rules and from that evolved the present American sport.

      • The Notman photo, which is actually a composite of posed shots taken in his studio (and not an action pic), is from the third game that year, played in Montreal on Oct. 23, 1874.

    • Kathleen says:

      I found this very interesting, and like the other comment I read was clear about what you were talking about. I’m not a big sports watcher, however I like my history. Thank you.