@*@ Header
 Newly sworn in Minister of Foreign Affairs Stephane Dion is congratulated by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau during a ceremony at Rideau Hall, in Ottawa, on Wednesday, Nov. 4, 2015.

Newly sworn in Minister of Foreign Affairs Stephane Dion is congratulated by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau during a ceremony at Rideau Hall, in Ottawa, on Wednesday, Nov. 4, 2015.
Photo Credit: PC / Sean Kilpatrick

How will Canada’s foreign policy change under Stéphane Dion?

FacebookTwitterGoogle+PinterestEmailPrint
 Minister of Foreign Affairs Stephane Dion speaks to the media and Department of Foreign Affairs staff following a cabinet meeting at foreign affairs headquarters in Ottawa on Friday, November 6, 2015.

Minister of Foreign Affairs Stephane Dion speaks to the media and Department of Foreign Affairs staff following a cabinet meeting at foreign affairs headquarters in Ottawa on Friday, November 6, 2015. © PC/Sean Kilpatrick

When Prime Minister Justin Trudeau named Stephane Dion to be Canada’s new minister of foreign affairs, I admit I was surprised. Like many, I was expecting Dion to take over the environment portfolio, a very sensitive file that Dion, a former environment minister in Paul Martin’s government, knows better than, perhaps, most of his colleagues.

A quiet and very reserved man, Dion didn’t strike me as an obvious choice to be Canada’s top diplomat and all the high-level schmoozing and wheeling-and-dealing associated with the position.

So to find out whether Dion has what it takes to be the minister of foreign affairs and what his nomination says about the kind of foreign policy the new Liberal government is going to pursue, I called Paul Heinbecker. He is a former Canadian ambassador to the United Nations and chief foreign policy advisor to former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, and a man who literally wrote the book on Canadian foreign policy

A man of intellect

“Foreign affairs is a difficult portfolio, much more difficult than it looks,” Heinbecker said in a phone interview. “It’s a portfolio above all others where you can’t control events. With other portfolios you can set some goals you can try to realize them. But if you’re in foreign affairs, you are reacting about 90 per cent of the time.”

The government’s foreign policy objectives, goals and interests are constantly tested and challenged by the outside world and events, such as the apparent bombing of the Russian passenger jet over Egypt’s Sinai peninsula, Heinbecker said.

“You have to be able to respond intelligently and preferably within the parameters of your own policy thinking and your own vision of what it is you want the country to do,” Heinbecker said. “So that takes a lot of intellect and Mr. Dion has a reputation for intellect.”

Dion was a star academic when he was brought into the Liberal Party by former Prime Minister Jean Chretien, he has been the leader of the Liberal party, the leader of the official opposition and he has more experience than most of his Conservative predecessors, he said.

“I think it’s fair to say, although it sounds like an exaggeration, that he’s had more international experience, more under his belt, than the previous four Conservative foreign ministers taken together,” Heinbecker said.

Dion’s mastery of the environmental portfolio will also be very appreciated by his cabinet colleagues as climate change is likely to be one of the most important challenges facing the new government not only on the domestic front but also in its foreign policy, he said.

Listen
Not just a change in tone
 Canada's U.N. Ambassador Paul Heinbecker addresses the Security Council regarding Iraq Tuesday, March 11, 2003.

Canada’s U.N. Ambassador Paul Heinbecker addresses the Security Council regarding Iraq Tuesday, March 11, 2003. © CHARLES DHARAPAK

Heinbecker says under Dion’s leadership Canada’s foreign policy will undergo dramatic changes that go far beyond just a change in tone.

“The foreign policy of the Harper government was failing practically on every count,” Heinbecker said. “They walked away from the UN, they walked away from climate change, they walked away from the Desertification Convention, they didn’t sign the Arms Trade Treaty even though the United States and every other member of NATO did.”

And while Canada walked away from its traditional focus on multilateral diplomacy, Canada’s bilateral ties with its main trading partners didn’t improve either, he said.

Relations with the United States are at their lowest in decades, the Mexican president even cancelled a visit to Canada over the Conservative government’s sudden imposition of visas on Mexican citizens, and relations with China never really took off, Heinbecker said.

“So how will Canadian foreign policy change? It will change in substance,” Heinbecker said. “They’re starting with climate change, it’s an important consideration. But they have also signalled that they are going to play a more constructive way at the UN.”

 UN headquarters in New York.
UN headquarters in New York © Adam Rountree/AP Photo/ File
Re-engaging with the world

Heinbecker said he expects Canada to start playing a more constructive role in peacekeeping by providing assistance to other militaries with its world-class expertise in logistics, communications and intelligence gathering.

Heinbecker also said he expects Canadian diplomats to be much more vocal on the international scene in promoting Canadian interests.

“One of the craziest things was that you had representatives abroad under the Conservative government, but they weren’t allowed to say anything,” Heinbecker said. “How do you expect them to represent your interests?”

Heinbecker said he expects to see changes in Canada’s Middle East policy and a return to more ‘fairminded’ approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

“The Harper government for reasons that nobody was altogether sure of decided that it would be unequivocally and unquestioningly in support of the Likud government in Tel Aviv,” Heinbecker said. “That won us one friend and lost us a lot of influence.”

Canada’s re-engagement with the world will be very welcome internationally.

“Abroad there are enormous expectations building up, people are very keen on seeing Canada get back to where it used to be,” Heinbecker said. “The world is expecting change from Canada and is welcoming that. Canada used to be seen as the constructive problem-solving country.”

As a middle power country, it’s in Canada’s interests to exist in an international system where countries live according to certain rules, where multilateral institutions act like a constraint on the great powers. Heinbecker says that the new Liberal government shows all signs that it understands this interest and is willing to re-engage with the world, instead of sitting on the sidelines and claiming to have ‘superior moral principles’.

“We’ve effectively been the world’s mother-in-law for the last ten years,” Heinbecker said. “It’s time for us to get back to constructive engagement.”

Still Heinbecker cautions not to expect changes overnight, saying the policy pursued by the previous government will take some time to correct.

For example, re-establishing diplomatic relations with Iran, after Canada pulled its ambassador from the country and expelled all Iranian diplomats from Canada in 2012, will take longer than most people realize, Heinbecker said.

“Iranians would have to agree and they were not very happy when we walked away from them, and one imagines they would be thinking twice before welcoming is us back,” Heinbecker said.

Russia and the Arctic
 The Canadian Coast Guard icebreaker Louis S. St-Laurent makes its way through the ice in Baffin Bay, Thursday, July 10, 2008.
The Canadian Coast Guard icebreaker Louis S. St-Laurent makes its way through the ice in Baffin Bay, Thursday, July 10, 2008. © PC/JONATHAN HAYWARD

Building a more constructive relationship with Russia will be one of the more difficult files facing Dion, Heinbecker said.

He said Canada cannot accept on principle Russia’s claim to have a sphere of influence in the former Soviet block countries and the Kremlin’s attempts to dictate their foreign policy. On the other hand, Heinbecker says Canada has to be very realistic about its capabilities when confronting Russia over its policy in Ukraine.

However, the biggest test for Canada’s relations with Russia might come in the Arctic.

“It’s hard to predict how the Russians will behave in the Arctic,” Heinbecker said. “That’s one place where actually where Canadian interest might be directly engaged in the Arctic, rather than by the way of NATO.”

Canada really needs to invest in its capabilities in the Arctic and do that without provoking Russia, he said.

“The Harper government’s emphasis on the Arctic was basically photo ops,” Heinbecker said. “We’re building one icebreaker, the Russians are building 14. We had a military exercise in the Arctic in which we deployed 200 soldiers, they had one in which they deployed 35,000.”

column-banner-LEVON

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in International, Politics

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

2 comments on “How will Canada’s foreign policy change under Stéphane Dion?
  1. Kennedy Jawoko says:

    Although the trend began in the 1990s, under PM Stephen Harper, Canada’s policy on Africa was generally inadequate and incoherent. Whether in terms of trade, diplomatic representation or international development, Canada’s relations to Africa were diminished compared to past policies by other governments – where Canada punched well above its weight in the global arena, and where there was a very close alignment at all levels between Foreign Affairs, the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) and the International Development Research Centre (IDRC).

    So here’s one key suggestion for Foreign Affairs Minister Stéphane Dion if the Trudeau Liberals are indeed serious about resetting the button.

    Trade and Aid: There’sl a need for Canada to find innovative ways to engage the continent beyond just promoting Canada’s mining firms. For example, the Liberals should unfreeze Canada’s aid to Africa to allow for funding in education, research, knowledge and technical skills transfer. Africa is an increasingly important market for countries like Turkey, China and India. An engaged Canada could support African countries on the governance of their natural resources. According to a 2013 report by the North South Institute, revenue raised from the natural resources sector has been the most important driver of revenue mobilization for African countries in recent years. The value of bilateral trade in the mining sector is one of several ways of looking at Canada’s engagement in the sector globally, and specifically in Africa.

  2. stan says:

    So far not so good?
    I think you will find Canada is one of the cleanest countries in the world
    The second worst is the United States topped off by China, Russia Japan
    Secondly I think Mexicans must use visa’s to enter Canada.
    Frankly I think the Liberals as a whole have been too far removed from the world
    to know anything about it (today) “The world is expecting change from Canada”
    is about as fresh as the world wants to see more selfie pictures of Justin..