A new report urges Canada to drastically change how it manages its fisheries to rebuild its depleted fish stocks.

A new report urges Canada to drastically change how it manages its fisheries to rebuild its depleted fish stocks.
Photo Credit: A Pascal Rossignol / Reuters

Canada’s fish stocks severely depleted: Oceana report

Less than a quarter of Canada’s fish stocks are considered healthy and the status of almost half is unknown, according to a new report released today.

The report by Oceana Canada, a charity dedicated to protection of the country’s three oceans, also outlines the extent to which it says “overfishing and decades of poor management practices have severely depleted our fish populations.”

“As Canadians, we perceive ourselves to be good stewards of the environment. But when it comes to our oceans, we have failed to live up to that ideal,” said in a statement Julia Baum of University of Victoria and lead author of the scientific report.

Canada needs to get serious about ocean conservation, said Josh Laughren, Oceana Canada executive director, in an interview with RCI. Science-based management and recovery of Canadian fisheries must become a political priority, he said.

“We don’t know very much oftentimes,” Laughren said. “Canada does a worse job than most other countries, almost any other of the developed countries, in making available information on the status of our fish.”

(click to listen the full interview with Josh Laughren)

Listen
Flawed legal framework
 Since 1970, the biomass of Canadian marine stocks has declined by 55 per cent.
Since 1970, the biomass of Canadian marine stocks has declined by 55 per cent. ©  Pascal Rossignol / Reuters

One of the reasons for this lack of knowledge has to do with Canada’s legal framework governing the fisheries. There is no legal basis to require the government to report on the status of fish stocks.

Unlike the United States where the Congress gets quarterly reports on fish stocks, Canada’s Fisheries Act doesn’t require reporting on the status of stocks and doesn’t require rebuilding of stocks, Laughren said.

Without that legal framework there are also inconsistencies on how the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) collects information on each of Canada’s three coasts, he said.

Mélanie Mellon, a spokesperson for the DFO, said work is underway to make information on fishery stocks more accessible to Canadians. It will be available on the Fisheries and Oceans website by the end of 2016, she said.

“We also have several initiatives underway to increase transparency on fishery management decisions and provide more information on how decisions are made,” Mellon wrote in an email in response to RCI questions.

The third reason is cultural, Laughren said.

“The department really is designed to serve its clients, that’s the word they use in the fishing industry,” Laughren said. “So the whole apparatus is designed to give the fishing industry what they need in order to fish their stocks over the next year.”

Eggs in one basket

The report says since 1970 the biomass of Canadian marine stocks has declined by 55 per cent.

Yet Canada is making more money from our seafood industry than ever before. In 2015, Canada’s Atlantic, Arctic and Pacific fisheries were worth about $6 billion and directly employed 46,000 people, while also providing 32,000 indirect jobs.

But most of the income from the fisheries this is based primarily on a small number of shellfish stocks, mainly lobster, crab, shrimp and scallops, Laughren said.

This lack of diversity makes coastal communities and the Canadian seafood industry vulnerable, as communities could have little to fall back on if these stocks decline, the report says.

The collapse of the cod industry in 1992 led to tens of thousands of people out of work and financial losses of $4 billion.

No rebuilding plan
 In 2015, Canada’s Atlantic, Arctic and Pacific fisheries were worth about $6 billion and directly employed 46,000 people, while also providing 32,000 indirect jobs.
In 2015, Canada’s Atlantic, Arctic and Pacific fisheries were worth about $6 billion and directly employed 46,000 people, while also providing 32,000 indirect jobs. ©  Pascal Rossignol / Reuters

Nearly twenty-five years after the collapse, only one stock has a rebuilding plan, Laughren said.

“What we found is that although we stopped the decline of those fisheries in the 1990s, we didn’t allow for the recovery,” Laughren said. “So what we’re seeing with a lot of stocks unhealthy is still the hangover of that overfishing.”

Unlike some other countries Canada hasn’t invested in the recovery of those stocks, he said.

Mellon said the DFO has just announced a review of the recent changes to the Fisheries Act with respect to fish habitat.

“While the review is underway, the government will continue to ensure that fish and fish habitat are protected,” Mellon said. “We will implement new processes to monitor development projects and for reporting back to the public on how fish and fish habitat are being protected.”

There are many success stories that prove that with the right management and conservation efforts depleted fish stocks rebound, Laughren said.

“Fish don’t breed like rabbits, rabbits breed like fish,” he said.

Fish lay millions of eggs and often the recovery can happen very quickly when the right conditions are put in place, Laughren said.

A good news story

The recovery Atlantic halibut is a case in point.

Halibut was in very rough shape in 1990s like cod and other ground fish, Laughren said.

But when Canadian authorities put in place the moratorium on cod fishing following its dramatic collapse in early 1990s, they also limited fishing on halibut, Laughren said.

“When that happened halibut recovered,” he said. “So this is a large apex predator, a slow-growing fish, and it recovered in 15 years or so and now it looks like at historical levels.”

That means the amount of halibut that are being fished has gone up too.

“The population has recovered, it’s part of a healthier ecosystem, and communities are getting benefits from that too,” Laughren said. “We know that when you limit the mortality, when you limit the amount of fish that you’re catching, fish do recover.”

The report makes four recommendations to restore the health of Canadian fish stocks:

  • Greater transparency, more regular reporting on the status of fish stocks
  • Reinvestment in science
  • Put in place fish stock rebuilding plans
  • Reform the Fisheries Act
Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Economy, Environment

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*