The coalition of NGOs presented the report last week to the United Nations in Geneva on the occasion of the 5th UN Annual Forum on Business and Human Rights.

The coalition of NGOs presented the report last week to the United Nations in Geneva on the occasion of the 5th UN Annual Forum on Business and Human Rights.
Photo Credit: Genevieve Paul

NGOs call for independent ombudsman to oversee Canadian mining activities abroad


A coalition of NGOs is calling on the Liberal government to create an independent ombudsman to investigate potential abuses by Canadian multinational companies abroad, particularly in the mining sector.

The recommendation is part of a report released last week by Above GroundOECD Watch, and Mining Watch Canada.

The report called “Canada is Back, But Still Far Behind” examines the performance of Canada’s National Contact Point (NCP), illustrated by its review of complaints of serious harm linked to five Canadian mining projects in Ecuador, Mongolia, Papua New Guinea, Chinese Tibet and Zambia.

Under OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises all participating governments, including Canada’s, are required to establish National Contact Points to protect workers’ rights and the environment, curb corruption, and investigate complaints and ensure compliance.

Flawed strategy

The Canadian government relies on the NCP as a central component of its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) strategy, said the report.

But critics say in its current form the strategy is a fig leaf that allows the federal government to claim that they are working on advancing ethical business practices and human rights while in reality very little is being done on the practical level.

“We want the new government to comprehensively reform its CSR strategy,” said Geneviève Paul, a program officer at Above Ground. “We want a legal and policy reform to make sure that Canadian companies are required to respect human rights and the environment when they operate abroad.”

(click to listen to the full interview with Geneviève Paul)


(Erratum: At 2:50 in the audio interview, the statistic mentioned should read: Companies are not required to sit at the table and in over 50% of cases, the cases submitted to the NCP have not made it passed the admissibility stage”)

Toothless watchdog
Ecuadorian Indian protesters participate in a march to Quito to protest against the El Mirador copper mining project,in Quito March 22, 2012.
Ecuadorian Indian protesters participate in a march to Quito to protest against the El Mirador copper mining project,in Quito March 22, 2012. ©  GARY GRANJA / Reuters

In contrast to the current NCP, which lacks the teeth to investigate and enforce the OECD guidelines, an ombudsperson office would be independent, transparent and credible, the three NGOs said.

“It would have the power to undertake investigations, to assess if harm has been caused and to apply effective sanctions in cases of non-compliance with human rights and environmental standards,” the report said.

Companies that fail to abide by the norms set out by the OECD have to face appropriate sanctions and victims of the abuses carried out by these companies have to have access to justice and reparations, particularly when they have no such access in their home countries, Paul said.

The report slams the Canadian NCP for its lack of independence, its opaque procedures, unjustified delays in reviewing complaints, as well as an “unjustifiably high threshold” for accepting complaints.

The NCP does not make findings on whether companies have breached the guidelines, Paul said. And the process rarely concludes with an agreement or recommendations, and there are no effective follow-up procedures in place, she said.

“The bottom line is that this mechanism is voluntary,” Paul said.

Campaign promises
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau works the phones at Liberal headquarters in Ottawa, Wednesday October 19, 2016.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau works the phones at Liberal headquarters in Ottawa, Wednesday, October 19, 2016. © PC/Adrian Wyld

Paul said the NGOs have discussed their concerns with Global Affairs officials who are in charge of the NCP process but have yet to see concrete action to remedy some of the shortcomings.

“These are things that we have been discussing actually with the Liberals 10 years ago, there were a series of national round tables back in 2006 where there was an agreement that the situation is serious, that companies are involved in serious allegations of human rights abuses abroad,” Paul said.

There was agreement that more needed to be done and that Canada needed an independent ombudsperson office that could investigate complaints, she said.

“Even the industry had accepted that recommendation but 10 years later we’re still waiting to see that happen,” Paul said. “The Liberals have pledged to do that in their campaign so we’re really, really hoping to see some leadership in this area, starting with the creation of an ombudsperson’s office.”

No one from Global Affairs, the lead federal agency on NCP and corporate social responsibility, was available for an interview Monday. However, the department sent the following statement: “The Government of Canada is assessing Canada’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) approach and identifying ways to strengthen it, ensuring that we continue to demonstrate real leadership around the world on CSR.”

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in Economy, Environment, International, Politics

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.