Once there is an accident, Canadian police can test the driver for possible alcohol consumption. But where there is no reason to suspect, police cannot make a random check.

Once there is an accident, Canadian police can test the driver for possible alcohol consumption. But where there is no reason to suspect, police cannot make a random check.
Photo Credit: Royal Canadian Mounted Police

Canada ranks first in driving deaths linked to alcohol


Among 19 rich countries, Canada has the highest percentage of road deaths caused by alcohol impairment, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control. Overall, road fatalities are down in Canada, but 34 per cent of them are related to drinking. That makes it the biggest cause of criminal deaths, says Andrew Murie, CEO of Mothers Against Drunk Driving or MADD Canada.


Study ‘a way of making Canada wake up’

“It’s not a surprise. We’ve known that North America—Canada and the U.S.—have always lagged greatly behind the EU countries and Australia (in cracking down on drunk driving),” he says. “The study did a brilliant way of making Canada wake up and I think a lot of action is required.”

Murie thinks mandatory screening at roadsides would go a long way in preventing alcohol-related road deaths. As it now stands, Canadian police officers must have grounds to suspect someone is driving drunk before stopping and testing them. Parliament is now considering legislation that would allow police to set up roadside stops and conduct random, obligatory screening.

Finding open bottles of alcohol gave police the authority to test the driver for alcohol levels in this incident in September 2010 in Surrey, British Columbia.
Finding open bottles of alcohol gave police the authority to test the driver for alcohol levels in this incident in September 2010 in Surrey, British Columbia. © Darryl Dyck/Canadian Press

Mandatory screening ‘a great deterrent’

“It works as a great deterrent,” says Murie. “Because if people know that when go through one of these check points they’re going to be screened, then they are less likely to drink and drive.”

If the Canadian government passes a law allowing mandatory screenings, it could be challenged in court because Canadians have a constitutional guarantee against unreasonable search and seizure (section 8, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms). The government would have to prove that current strategies to prevent alcohol-related road deaths are not working.

Murie thinks that would stand up in court.

Canada introduced breathalyzer tests for drivers in 1969.
Canada introduced breathalyzer tests for drivers in 1969. © PC/Darryl Dyck/Canadian Press

Two provinces impound vehicles on suspicion

In addition to mandatory screening, Murie says provincial governments could order that vehicles be impounded if drivers are suspected of drinking and driving. The provinces of British Columbia and Alberta already impound vehicles in such cases for three days and Murie says that has resulted in a dramatic drop in road accident deaths.

Murie calls such action “absolutely essential” to reducing what he calls a needless cause of death. If both strategies were adopted he estimates 300 fewer Canadians would die every year.

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Society

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.


One comment on “Canada ranks first in driving deaths linked to alcohol
  1. Mike (@Staff_ieri) says:

    road fatalities are down by 45% according to stats canada since 1995…if 34% of them are drunk driving then drunk driving fatalities are also down by 45% since 1995