In this photo taken on Tuesday, April 4, 2017 and made available Wednesday, April 5, a Syrian man holds a suffering baby victim of alleged chemical weapons attacks in Syrian city of Idlib, inside Syria, near the Reyhanli border crossing, Turkey.

In this photo taken on Tuesday, April 4, 2017 and made available Wednesday, April 5, a Syrian man holds a suffering baby victim of alleged chemical weapons attacks in Syrian city of Idlib, inside Syria, near the Reyhanli border crossing, Turkey.
Photo Credit: (IHA via AP)

Canada condemns ‘absolutely reprehensible’ chemical attack in Syria

The international community must carefully investigate the facts surrounding the “absolutely reprehensible” chemical weapons attack in Syria that killed 72 people, including 20 children, Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland said Wednesday.

“I do want to express my very deep personal outrage and grief at the reports of a chemical weapons attack against civilians,” Freeland told reporters during a teleconference call from Brussels, where she took part in the Brussels Conference on Supporting the Future of Syria and the Region.

“As a mother I have to say it’s particularly horrible to see those dreadful images of the suffering and dying children.”

Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland speaks with the media as she arrives for a meeting of NATO foreign ministers at NATO headquarters in Brussels on Friday, March 31, 2017.
Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland speaks with the media as she arrives for a meeting of NATO foreign ministers at NATO headquarters in Brussels on Friday, March 31, 2017. © Virginia Mayo

However, Freeland stopped short of blaming President Bashar Assad’s government and called on all the members of the United Nations Security Council to support the resolution demanding a full investigation of the attack on the town of Khan Sheikhun, in Idlib province, in northwestern Syria.

The draft resolution presented by Britain, France, and the United States calls for a full investigation by the Organisation of the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) of the attack in the early hours of Tuesday in the rebel-held town.

Canada along with the United States is the largest national donor to the Joint Investigative Mechanism that was created by the UN and the OPCW, Freeland said.

“That mechanism is essential in clearly establishing the facts in situations like these,” Freeland said. “It is absolutely essential that we establish the facts clearly and incontrovertibly and people behind this truly heinous attack on civilians be held accountable.”

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley sits during a meeting at the United Nations Security Council on Syria at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, NY, U.S. April 5, 2017. (REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton)

Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the UN, said the attacks have “all the hallmarks” of Assad’s government and the U.S. may take action if the UN Security Council fails to act.

“How many more children have to die before Russia cares?” Haley said.

The UN envoy for Russia, which intervened in Syria in 2015 to prop up Assad, opposed the resolution, saying it is based on information from “discredited” groups.

In this photo taken on late Tuesday, April 4, 2017 and made available Wednesday, April 5, a victim of alleged chemical weapons attacks in Syrian city of Idlib, at a local hospital in Reyhanli, Turkey. (IHA via AP)

Russia has offered an alternative interpretation of the events in Syria.

Russia’s Defense Ministry spokesman confirmed that the airstrike in Idlib province was indeed carried out by the Syrian Air Force.  However, the strike destroyed a warehouse where chemical weapons were being produced and stockpiled before being shipped to Iraq, Maj.-Gen. Igor Konashenkov said in a statement.

France’s Ambassador to the UN Francois Delattre refuted Russian arguments.

“There was no fire, even though such a strike [on an alleged chemical warehouse] would have caused a fire, and the consequences would have been much more serious for the civilian population,” Delattre said in a statement to the Security Council meeting.

With files from The Canadian Press

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in International, Politics

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*