The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled against the Yukon government, ending a five-year legal battle between the Yukon government and a coalition of First Nation and environmental groups over protection for a large watershed in northern Yukon.

The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled against the Yukon government, ending a five-year legal battle between the Yukon government and a coalition of First Nation and environmental groups over protection for a large watershed in northern Yukon.
Photo Credit: Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press

Supreme Court rules in favour of Yukon First Nations in Peel watershed dispute

The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled in favour of Yukon First Nations in their fight to protect a large area of almost pristine sub-Arctic wilderness from resource development.

The unanimous ruling released Friday ends a five-year legal battle between the Yukon government and a group of First Nations and environmental groups over government’s plans to short-circuit collaborative regional land use planning process over development plans of the Peel watershed region.

The Peel watershed is a roughly 68,000-square-kilometre swath of nearly untouched wilderness that represents about 16 per cent of Yukon.

The unanimous ruling released Friday ends a five-year legal battle between the Yukon government and a group of First Nations and environmental groups and returns the parties to an earlier stage in the planning process.

The case revolves around land claims agreements between the governments of Yukon, Canada, and the First Nations.

The dispute centres on a land use plan for the Peel region, a 68,000-square-kilometre swath of pristine sub-Arctic wilderness that represents about 16 per cent of Yukon.
The dispute centres on a land use plan for the Peel region, a 68,000-square-kilometre swath of pristine sub-Arctic wilderness that represents about 16 per cent of Yukon. © (CBC)

These Final Agreements recognize the traditional territories of the First Nations in the Yukon portion of the Peel Watershed and their right to participate in the management of public resources in that area.

In 2004, the Peel Watershed Planning Commission was established to develop a regional land use plan for the Peel Watershed.

In 2009, after years of research and consultation, the commission initiated the land use approval process by submitting its Recommended Peel Watershed Regional Land Use Plan to Yukon and the affected First Nations.  It would have protected about 80 per cent of the region from development.

However, near the end of the approval process, and after the commission had released a Final Recommended Plan, the government of Yukon proposed and adopted a final plan that made substantial changes to increase access to and development of the region, setting aside for protection just 30 per cent of the Peel Watershed.

A campsite on the Hart River in the Peel watershed.
A campsite on the Hart River in the Peel watershed. © Juri Peepre

The Yukon First Nations took the territorial government to court which ruled in their favour, however the territorial government appealed that decision, and won a partial victory in the Yukon Court of Appeal, until the First Nations and environmental groups in turn appealed to the country’s highest court.

In the ruling Friday, written by Justice Andromache Karakatsanis, the court upheld the original ruling by a trial judge to quash the territorial government’s final land-use plan, ordering the planning process to resume at an earlier stage.

The Supreme Court ruled that the government of Yukon did not have the authority to make the changes that it made to the Final Recommended Plan.

“Yukon’s changes to the Final Recommended Plan did not respect the land use planning process in the Final Agreements and its conduct was not becoming of the honour of the Crown,” the Supreme Court ruling reads.

Yukon must bear the consequences of its failure to diligently advance its interests and exercise its right to properly propose modifications related to access and development to the Recommended Plan, the court said.

The territorial government cannot use the Supreme Court proceedings to obtain another opportunity to exercise a right it chose not to exercise at the appropriate time, the court said.

With files from CBC News

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Indigenous, Politics, Society

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*