Cars on the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway in Arctic Canada on November 15, 2017. The opening of this road, and what it will mean for the people and economy of the region, are one of the top Arctic stories of 2017 says Mia Bennett from Cryopolitics. (Melinda Trochu/AFP/Getty Images)

Russian oil, cooperation over commerce & Canada’s Arctic highway : 2017 Arctic Year in Review

Eye on the Arctic brings you stories and newsmakers from across the North

The end of the year is often a time to take stock, and here at Eye on the Arctic we’re no different.

That’s why, as 2017 draws to a close, we’re checking in with our bloggers to get their take on all things Arctic; from science to society, from media to diplomacy.

Up today is Mia Bennett, an Arctic expert who runs the Cryopolitics Arctic news and analysis blog,

Feature Interview with Mia Bennett

Mia Bennett, manager of the Cryopolitics news and analysis blog. (Courtesy Mia Bennett)

Eye on the Arctic: Good, bad or bumbling – how would you sum up general Arctic news coverage in 2017?

Mia Bennett: Largely, coverage of the Arctic has been improving. We’re seeing less focus on narratives like “The Race for Resources.” And there’s increasing examination of climate change and successful international cooperation.

What were your two most important Arctic stories of the year?  

1. Opening of Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway in Arctic Canada: It means a lot for these two communities (Inuvik and Tuktoyaktuk) to be connected now in the Inuvialuit Settlement Region.   This is an exciting project because although the highway was funded by the Canadian government, the road was fully constructed by two Indigenous-owned companies. It shows a lot about the kind of development being led, in some parts of the Arctic, by Indigenous Peoples.

It’s also socially important: for the people that got jobs working on this highway for five years; for the people that will now hopefully have lower grocery and fuel costs; and maybe for future development like tourism as well.

2. Commercial fishing ban in Central Arctic OceanOne of the reasons this is exciting is because it’s based on the precautionary principle. Basically what these countries, and the European Union (EU), decided was, ‘this is an instance where we’ll wait and see what the science tells us before we go fishing in an ecosystem where we don’t know what those effects would be.’

It’s a good sign of science guiding policy and development in the Arctic before it takes place.

At the same time, (the agreement) also highlights the degree to which the Asian states and the EU have an important influence in Arctic affairs and these issues aren’t just being decided by the Arctic Council.

U.S. involvement in the Arctic Council seems remarkably untouched by the chaos we’ve seen elsewhere under the Trump administration – what gives?

First, the U.S. is no longer chair. Its role is a little less high profile than before, so, on a day-to-day level, the work can still be carried on by career diplomats who might hopefully be removed from some of the chaos occurring both within the White House and within the higher ranks of the State Department. But still, at the Fairbanks ministerial we saw a different  perspective presented by the U.S.

The Fairbanks Declaration still underscored climate change as the number 1 threat facing the Arctic. But Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s remarks at the ministerial still avoided this phrase for the most part saying: “…the Council has strengthened resilience at the national and local levels in the face of environmental and other change.” So I think that was a glaring lack of calling attention to climate change.

But even though the Trump administration might not be messing too directly with U.S. involvement in the Arctic Council, I think we’re seeing different stances from Washington, D.C. towards the Arctic at a more federal to state level, for example, the Trump administration trying to promote oil and gas drilling in Alaska.

But I think we do have to keep in mind what the longer term effects of America’s retreat from international diplomacy, and also Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris agreement, will have on the country’s participation in the Arctic Council in the long run.

Was there any Arctic issue or event that you felt was overlooked, underreported – or that you feel just didn’t get the attention it deserved in 2017?

The slow, creeping increase in Arctic oil exploration: Just the other year we had Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and then U.S. President Barack Obama put moratoriums on offshore drilling in the Arctic. So people in North America might think there’s a bit of a standstill up North.  But on the European side, Norway, and particularly Russia,  have been going full-steam ahead into Arctic oil and gas exploration.

Russian President Vladimir Putin just opened the long-awaited $27-billion Yamal LNG project in the Russian Arctic. That project was partly funded by China and really has succeeded despite ongoing U.S. and European sanctions. Russia’s oil output from the Arctic is close to coming on par with production on Alaska’s North Slope. So we’ve really seen Russia turn into a big producer of Arctic oil. I think this is something that, because it’s been slow in the making, hasn’t really got the attention it deserves as a story.

What will you be watching for in 2018?

The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge:  Will it be opened to leasing and exploration?

The Canadian High Arctic Research Station in Cambridge Bay, Nunavut: That will be exciting – having a permanent Canadian research presence with this big shiny research station. That will be something to watch.

Future of  Russia’s Northern Sea Route (NSR) : Will Putin seek to nationalize oil and gas shipping along the NSR ? That could have pretty interesting effects. Especially if China wants to integrate the Northern Sea Route into its massive Belt and Road Initiative, there could be some tensions there.

The above Q&A has been edited and abridged.

Listen to the full Eye on the Arctic interview with Mia Bennett:

Write to Eilís Quinn at eilis.quinn(at)

Other interviews in this series:

Fishing diplomacy, rethinking China & how Twitter is improving northern news : 2017 Arctic Year in Review


Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in International

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.