‘Wrong people on trial’ for Lac-Mégantic disaster: support group
Former Montreal Maine and Atlantic Railway Ltd. employees Tom Harding, right, Jean Demaitre, centre, and Richard Labrie are escorted by police to appear in court in Lac-Megantic, Que., on Tuesday, May 13, 2014.

Former Montreal Maine and Atlantic Railway Ltd. employees Tom Harding, right, Jean Demaitre, centre, and Richard Labrie are escorted by police to appear in court in Lac-Megantic, Que., on Tuesday, May 13, 2014.
Photo Credit: PC / Ryan Remiorz

‘Wrong people on trial’ for Lac-Mégantic disaster: support group

Share

Three railway workers on trial for one of the deadliest and most destructive train disasters in Canadian history should not be made scapegoats for policy failures by the railway company they worked for and the federal government that failed to properly regulate the industry, says a group of supporters.

Fritz Edler, a veteran locomotive engineer and accident investigator from the United States and a representative of a volunteer support group for the two of the accused, said instead they want to have a full public inquiry to bring to light systemic safety issues still plaguing the North American railway system.

“Things like refusal to allow crews to use automatic brakes to secure the equipment, things like taking the most dangerous cargo and making the train longer and heavier so it couldn’t fit on existing protected site,” Edler said in a phone interview with Radio Canada International.

“Things like sending such a train with a single crew member, which can only move forward, can’t split the train, can’t move backwards and no provisions to do anything about the resulting risk that come from those things.”

Anybody who has followed the trial and the testimony of 34 witnesses should understand that the “wrong people are on trial,” Edler said.

“It’s absolutely key that there must be real accountability for what happened in Lac-Mégantic.”

Instead, what has happened is that there has been a concerted effort by the prosecutors, the rail industry and some people in the media to say that they have resolved the problem with the prosecution of the three railway workers involved in the fateful rail disaster, Edler said.

Smoke rises from railway cars that were carrying crude oil after derailing in downtown Lac-Megantic, Que., on July 6, 2013.
Smoke rises from railway cars that were carrying crude oil after derailing in downtown Lac-Megantic, Que., on July 6, 2013. © Paul Chiasson

Former railway operations manager with Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway Jean Demaître, 53, locomotive engineer Thomas Harding, 56, and traffic controller Richard Labrie, 59, are on trial in Sherbrooke, Quebec for criminal negligence causing the death of 47 people.

The three men were charged after a runaway train carrying volatile Bakken crude oil barrelled into the town of Lac-Mégantic on July 6, 2013, killing 47 people and destroying the town’s core.

All three have pleaded not guilty.

Harding had stopped the train on top of a slope in nearby Nantes on the night of July 5 before it began moving on its own in the wee hours of the morning and barrelled into Lac-Mégantic.

The Crown argued in its closing arguments Wednesday that Harding applied only half the required level of brakes and didn’t test them to ensure they were working properly before he left for the night.

Lac-Mégantic's main street engulfed in flames on July 6, 2013. The centre of the small Quebec town was destroyed and 47 people died.
Lac-Mégantic’s main street engulfed in flames on July 6, 2013. The centre of the small Quebec town was destroyed and 47 people died. © Reuters

Demaître’s defence lawyer Gaétan Bourassa downplayed his client’s role within Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway, casting doubt on what his actual responsibilities were the night of the train derailment.

He also attempted to undermine the credibility of some of the Crown’s witnesses, reminded the jury his client is entitled to the presumption of innocence and added the burden of proof was squarely with the prosecution.

Once Bourassa finishes, Labrie’s attorney will present his arguments before Harding’s does likewise, probably Friday.

Quebec Superior Court Justice Gaetan Dumas will give his instructions to the jury next week.

The now-bankrupt Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway, will stand trial at a later date.

With files from The Canadian Press

Share
Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in Society

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

One comment on “‘Wrong people on trial’ for Lac-Mégantic disaster: support group
  1. Peter Ashcroft says:

    I read with interest this trial account.
    Earlier accounts seem to suggest that this train was under-manned with only a single operator on board.
    There should have been a siding in Nantes with an upward slope to the buffers.