2009: A Cf-18 Hornet flypast before landing at CFB Trenton in Ontario. PHOTO: Kevin Moore

Fighter jets: Canada’s fleet to continue till the 2030’s


(Story open for public comments-scroll to very bottom to read/submit)

Imagine Spitfires and Me 109’s being their countries front-line fighters for 40 or 50 years into the 1990’s.

Not quite the same scenario, but Canada’s CF-18’s, some of which date back to 1982, will apparently continue to serve up until about 2032, or about 50 years after they first entered service, as a then top-line fighter.

The plan to keep the CF-18 fleet going even longer was revealed at an aerospace “industry day” last week between Canadian government officials and various aerospace firms.

Members of the Canadian Air Task Force Lithuania position the CF-188 Hornet for an afterburner test at Šiauliai Air Base, Lithuania on October 16, 2014 during Operation REASSURANCE, in support of NATO Baltic Air Policing Block 36 Photo: Cpl Gabrielle DesRochers- Combat Camera

Plans were already announced to keep the ageing planes flying until 2025.  In 2016, Canada’s head of the air force, Lt.Gen Michael Hood said the 77-plane fleet could continue until then with upgrades to reduce risks and costs, with technical help from our U.S. ally.

Surprisingly, a Canadian Press report at the time said a message from Defence Minister, Sajjit Harjan’s office, said that wouldn’t address the issue of the limited number of airworthy jets at any given time due to maintenance issues.

Preparation for a night mission in Kuwait 2014.during Op Impact. PHOTO, Combat Camera

Calling them “old planes”, the note said even if all 77 planes were available, it would not meet Canada’s NATO, NORAD, and other commitments.

A report as far back as April 2016 said 49 of the planes had used up 85 per cent of their anticipated airframe life, and three had exceeded that.

An upgrade programme in 2001 to the fleet was meant to keep them in service until 2017-2020, with subsequent structural and technical  modifications meant to keep the fleet going until 2025.

Given the costs and political controversy surrounding the former Conservative government plans to buy new F-35’s from the US, the current Liberal government had announced they would not buy the planes, but open a new replacement competition.

They also announced a plan to buy 18 Boeing F-18 Super Hornets as a stop-gap measure to fill Canada’s national and international commitments.

A CF-18 Hornet from the Canadian Air Task Force Lithuania and a Portuguese F16 Fighting Falcon perform manoeuvers over Lithuania on September 15, 2014 for the NATO Baltic Air Policing Block 36 PHOTO Cpl Gabrielle DesRochers; Op Reassurance

Although the planes have a similar appearance to the current Hornets, the Super Hornet is in reality a much different plane.

Then with Boeing’s trade dispute action  against commercial carrier Bombardier over the C-series passenger jet, the Liberal government trashed the multi –billions Super Hornet deal, and instead said it would buy used Hornets from Australia.

This month’s industry day was to exchange information on government requirements for a new fighter, and industry to get an idea of how and what it could offer.

Boeing was not present at the industry day and the potential deal to buy used Australian F-18’s Hornet has yet to be signed.

additional information-sources

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in International, Internet, Science and Technology, Politics

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.


One comment on “Fighter jets: Canada’s fleet to continue till the 2030’s
  1. Peter Ashcroft says:

    This seems to be a case of updating the flying shelf life of these fighter jet aircraft. This is probably shorter than turboprops or the old piston aircraft, like the Douglas DC-3 Dakota.