Demonstrators hold signs during a protest in front of the White House after the Trump administration announced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) would be scrapped. Photo: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

Canadians clearly divided on accepting American DACA asylum seekers

Share

A new poll shows Canadians are divided on whether the country should accept people currently living in the U.S under temporary protected status and who may be forced to leave.

There are two U.S programmes involved both of which are easily confused.

One is the so-called DREAM Act (Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act) introduced in 2001 but although several versions have been introduced since, it has  never passed into law. The DREAM act would theoretically eventually lead to permanent residency for “dreamers” if certain conditions were met.

The other is  DACA- (Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals) which was introduced in 2012 by then President Obama as stopgap measure that would shield from deportation people who were brought into the United States as children ( a subset of Dreamers- children who had been in the U.S since 2007 and were under 16 upon arrival and under age 31 in 2012) The status is renewable, lasting two years at a time and allows people to live and work in the U.S. The program does not provide a pathway to citizenship.

Those living and studying or working in the U.S. under DACA are often nonetheless called “Dreamers”

President Trump has said DACA will be phased out and thereby end any protection for Dreamers, affecting about 800,000 people

A recent survey by the Angus Reid Institute has found that most Canadians think ending DACA is wrong. About 64 per cent, say the programme should remain.

As to whether Canada should welcome those affected by the ending of the policy, considerably fewer think that’s a good idea. But, those saying Canada should welcome them, and those saying no, are relatively close indicating a strong division.

Some 38 per cent say Canada should let them in, while 34 per cent say no, another third (28%)  are undecided.

Although a big issue in the U.S., a large number of Canadians are either unaware, or have only a passing awareness of the issue. Photo: Angus Reid Inst.

Response is also affected by age and political affiliation. Younger Canadians age 18-24 are more in favour, as are those affiliated with the centrist Liberal party, and the left leaning NDP.

Those older than 24 and tending toward the right leaning Conservative party are mor against welcoming Dreamers.

However, while this is big news in the U.S, especially with a caravan of Central American asylum seekers making their way north towards the U.S. border, many Canadians say they don’t know much about the situation.

Many Canadians have become concerned about the influx of migrants crossing illegally into Canada to claim asylum over fears of losing temporary protected status in the U.S and being deported. Photo: Ryan Remiorz- CP

A quarter of respondents (24%) say they haven’t heard anything about the DACA/Dreamer situation, while 29 per cent said they had merely scanned headlines.

What has been making news in Canada is the stream of migrants from the U.S who have been crossing illegally into Canada to claim asylum.  Most of the approximately 25,000-30,000 who crossed into Canada last year to claim asylum were people living under temporary protection status in the U.S. but feared being deported.

Additional information-

Share
Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in Economy, Immigration & Refugees, Politics, Society

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

One comment on “Canadians clearly divided on accepting American DACA asylum seekers
  1. Peter Ashcroft says:

    Open borders are not recommended.
    There is a need to consider a controlled inflow.