Fruit and vegetables in Canadian stores come from all over Canada, the US, Mexico and beyond. Testing showed the re-usable plastic containers now required by some major retailers are not being properly cleaned and carry bacteria and other pathogens, posing a potentially serious threat to Canada's produce industry, and also a slight risk to consumer health.
Photo Credit: Scott Applewhite/Associated Press

Food containers: when re-usable is not necessarily better

Share

A new study has shown that the increasing use of re-usable commercial plastic produce containers, has a drawback; bacterial contamination of the containers

After the first limited study of the containers last year found unacceptable levels of bacteria and pathogens, there was an industry promise to improve cleaning and sanitizing.

However, in the second, and broader study of the crates this year, Canadian researchers found even higher levels of bacteria and pathogens.

Keith Warriner  is a professor and Food Safety and Quality Assurance Program Director in the Department of Food Science at the University of Guelph, and president of the Ontario Food Protection Association

Listen
null
Keith Warriner (PhD) is a professor, Food Safety and Quality Assurance Program Director in the Department of Food Science at the University of Guelph © supplied

These reusable plastic containers (RPC)  have made their way into the North American market at the insistance of a few major retailers, obliging produce suppliers to use them.

Instead of the traditional cardboard boxes, which are used once and recycled, Canadian farmers now rent the RPC’s for packing and after one shipment, the RPC’s are supposed to be returned to the United States where they are to be cleaned and sanitized, before being sent on to the next farm.

What the researchers found however was, “alarming levels of sanitization and significant risk for food contamination,”

null
Many of the containers had very obvious signs of dirt, produce liquids and other residue still on them both inside and outside the containers in spite of being delivered as sanitzed and ready for re-use © Warriner

 In fact, using UK food safety standards for food surfaces as a pass/fail baseline, 43% of RPCs failed sanitary standards due to high ATP (adenosine triphosphate) readings (equivalent standards do not exist in North America).

Specifically, the fecal indicators were more prevalent in the current sampling trials compared to the study performed in 2013. Rates in the province of Quebec are especially alarming. RPCs sampled in Quebec recorded the highest indicator counts and ATP readings.

Following a small-scale sampling last year of 15 random crates, which resulted in promises to improve the sanitizing process, the survey this year was expanded to random testing over several weeks of 160 containers from several different packing locations in Ontario and Quebec which had delivered as cleaned and ready for re-use.

Plastic crate operator IFCO claims that its washing process “destroys 99.5 per cent of bacteria” and that “RPCs are washed, sanitised and air-dried between every issue, without fail.”

null
Several of the re-usable plastic containers still had labels on them from previous users. © Warriner

 Professor Warriner noted that in spite of promises of improved cleaning, there were examples of trays with previous user labels still on them.  He said, “Given the state of randomly selected RPCs I would question whether they are even sent to the US for sanitization at all.”

There are no cleaning facilities in Canada for the RPC’s,

Almost half (43 per cent) of the crates arriving at the growers’ farms failed basic sanitary standards; 73 per cent exceeded bacteria loading levels; and 51 per cent and 35 per cent failed tests for enterobacteriacea and coliform respectively.

Professor Warriner points out that there is relatively little risk to the consumer from the bacteria, however there is a real threat of pathogens being spread into various Canadian crops coming from the US or Mexico, with the risk of serious economic harm to Canada’s fruit and vegetable industry.  While there are strict rules for other aspects of food production, regulation for such re-usable and trans-border containers seems to fall through the cracks, according to professor Warriner.

Share
Categories: Economy, Environment, Health, International, Internet, Science and Technology
Tags: ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

One comment on “Food containers: when re-usable is not necessarily better
  1. Avatar Peter Ashcroft says:

    Another example of the pro’s and con’s of the tightrope of life.