This year, the Winnipeg Police Service in the province of Manitoba acquired a GURKHA tactical vehicle, from Terradyne Armored Vehicles.

This year, the Winnipeg Police Service in the province of Manitoba acquired a GURKHA tactical vehicle, from Terradyne Armored Vehicles.
Photo Credit: Winnipeg Police Services

Questions of militarization of police, again.


The acquisition of a large armoured vehicle by the city of Winnipeg police force has once again raised the question of the “militarization” of police in Canada.

A variety of similar such heavily armoured vehicles have been acquired by police forces in most major Canadian cities withs costs ranging from between C$300,000 to 400,000

The federal police force, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) have a variety of some 18 similar armoured vehicles stationed across the country.

Two modified ex-Canadian Army
Two modified ex-Canadian Army “Cougar” armoured vehicles were acquired by the RCMP in British Columbia in 2010 © RCMP

Police forces in Canada are now more commonly equipped with the military C8 assualt rifle as well.

Quoted in a CBC article , Frank Cormier, a criminology professor at the University of Manitoba, said,  “The idea of militarizing police, this is something that we’ve been seeing throughout North America, throughout the world, for the past decade or two. It’s rather distressing to those who study police and public relations,” he said.

Halifax is among the communities where police services have added the short-barreled assault rifle, known to the Canadian military a as the C8 carbine to their arsenals.
Halifax is among the many Canadian cities where police services have added the short-barreled assault rifle known to the Canadian military a as the C8 carbine to their arsenals. Many patrol cars across Canada now carry one or even two of the military style weapons © CBC

Critics of the “creeping militarization” say when police appear more and more often in body armour and military clothing, with automatic weapons and armoured vehicle, it creates distance and fear between the population and the forces.

In a Postmedia article by Ashley Csanady in 2014,  Kevin Walby a professor of criminal justice at the University of Winnipeg said, “The more interesting aspect of the militarization of the police is actually on the strategy side,”

He pointed out that police in both Canada and the US are being trained with military methods and tactics, and that police now often use military language  in referring to various situations.

Vancouver British Columbia acquired this armoured truck in 2010 at a cost of about $350,000.
Vancouver British Columbia acquired this armoured truck in 2010 at a cost of about $350,000. © CBC

In terms of physical surveillance, the purchase and use of helicopters for aerial surveillance have also been called into question. Winnipeg bought it’s helicopter for $3.5 million and residents  are reported saying it’s more of an annoyance than providing safety, as it hovers over the city almost every summer night.

Two police helicopters were kept hovering over Montreal for days during the student strikes in 2012 at a combined cost of over $2,000 an hour.

Critics of this creeping militarization say it tends to escalate tense situations rather than de-escalate.

The US has for years given  or sold surplus military equipment to police forces across that country, but in response to the militarization issue, US President Obama banned the practice for some military items in May of this year.

Additional info

Categories: Society
Tags: , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply to Bernd Wolpert Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.


One comment on “Questions of militarization of police, again.
  1. Avatar Bernd Wolpert says:

    Search military cars / tanks