Many thousands of Canadian jobs are at stake as a deadline approaches to reach an agreement with the US over Canadian softwood lumber exports.

Many thousands of Canadian jobs are at stake as a deadline approaches to reach an agreement with the US over Canadian softwood lumber exports. The US is threatening even greater protectionist tariffs
Photo Credit: Chuck Stoody/Canadian Press

Canada-US lumber deal, back again, still bad for Canada

Share

A new assessment by an economic analysis group says the Canada-US softwood lumber deal threatens up to 22,000 jobs in Canada.

It adds the deal has benefitted American producers, while harming Canadian producers and American consumers.

The analysis was prepared for the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI), an independent, non-partisan, not-for-profit research and educational organization.

“The case of softwood lumber is a perfect illustration of how protectionism generally provides benefits for a small number of people while harming a majority,” points out Alexandre Moreau, Public Policy Analyst at the MEI and author of the publication which was prepared as negotiations continue prior to an October 12 deadline.

The dispute over lumber has been dragging on for over 30 years. The Americans have long challenged Canadian lumber exported to the US claiming it is unfairly subsidized.

Most Canadian lumber is harvested on Crown land, whereas most US lumber is harvested on private land at higher cost to producers.

Canadian softwood lumber is used mostly in home construction. The report says the previous deal benefitted US wood producers while harming Canadian producers and American consumers
Canadian softwood lumber is used mostly in home construction. The report says the previous deal benefitted US wood producers while harming Canadian producers and American consumers © Richard Lam/Canadian Press

WTO rulings sided with Canada and while a NAFTA ruling agreed that royalties paid by Canadian companies to the Crown, were not high enough and so did constitute a subsidy.   However the MEI analysis points out, “it was below the threshold required to justify sanctions according to American law. The existence of harm or the threat of harm caused to the industry has therefore never been demonstrated beyond all doubt by the American government.”

In the face of continuing American legal action and an apparent battle of attrition against Canadian companies, an agreement was nonetheless worked out to be in effect from 2006- 2015. Tariffs and limits on Canadian softwood export were imposed ranging from 5% to 15% and would be combined with a export limit when US prices fell below $355 fer thousand board feet.

Major exporting provinces of Quebec and British Columbia instituted public auction mechanisms for access to Crown land to address American claims of a lack of free market value and costs for access to tree lots.

 “The fact that these two provinces have implemented market mechanisms to determine royalty levels should in theory allow them to avoid the possible imposition of tariffs by the United States,” adds Mr. Moreau.

The latest MEI ‘Viewpoint’  says that despite American setbacks at the  World Trade Organization (WTO) and North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), American softwood lumber producers are still calling for tariffs and/or limits to Canadian softwood lumber imports.

The current deal expired in 2015, with a one year grace period and so has to be renegotiated. Failure to get a new agreement by the October 12 deadline means Americans may begin imposing an even higher tariff of up to 25 percent, posing a serious threat to the Canadian industry.

The report said the current deal has resulted in an almost 8 percent reduction in Canadian exports and affected close to 22-thousand Canadian jobs.  A higher tariff will be certain to negatively affect thousands of Canadian jobs and the economy.

The analysis also notes that while the deal has harmed Canadian producers and greatly benefitted American producers, it has harmed American consumers by keeping wood prices higher.  By reducing Canadian softwood imports (used primarily in housing construction) Americans have had to use higher priced sources. The report estimates the US protectionist measures have cost American consumers and additional $6.36 billion.

The analysis says that even with a new deal and lower tariffs, American producers would still be the big winners, with Canadian producers, and American consumers continuing to pay the price.

Additional information –sources

Share
Categories: Economy, Environment, International, Politics
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

One comment on “Canada-US lumber deal, back again, still bad for Canada
  1. Avatar Glen says:

    I hope with every bone in my body that the Canadian Governments do not give in to USA bullying its time Canada look to other markets for our products and not be so dependant on a single source market
    its time to stand up for Canada and not give in to the so called leader of the free world.