Masked men attacking an opponent of M-103 in Montreal
Photo Credit: Graham Hughes- The Canadian Press

Free speech or Islamophobia- Clashes in cities across Canada

Share

It’s all because of a non-binding motion in Canada’s Parliament. The motion proposed by a Muslim member of the Liberal government seeks to condemn racism, discrimination and Islamophobia.

Opponents fear the potential for limits on free speech. The federal opposition Conservatives saying the Liberal motion singled out Islam for special consideration proposed a very similar motion, but without the word Islamophobia. That was defeated by the Liberal majority.

The Liberal motion known officially as M-103 will be debated in April.

This weekend however, several demonstrations and marches were held in cities across Canada with supporters and opponents of the Liberal motion.

In bitter cold in Montreal, anti M-103 demonstrators clash with Communists who apparently support the federal Liberal motion which condemns racism, and discrimination but which also singles out Islam for special consideration. © Jonathan Montpetit / CBC

Kept apart by police, it was mostly a case of the opposing sides shouting at each other, with pro and against sides each accusing the other of being racist and/or fascist.

In Calgary Alberta, Stephen Garvey said he organized the event on behalf of the Canadian Coalition of Concerned Citizens (CCCC) to protest M-103, a motion he believes infringes on every Canadian’s right to freedom of speech.

Quoted in the Calgary Herald he said, “A growing number of Canadians feel we’re under threat from this anti-Islamophobia motion — we feel it’s going too far,” said Garvey, who’s also the leader of National Advancement Party of Canada. “This whole thing of Islamophobia is complete nonsense as far as we’re concerned. No religion, ideology or way of life should ever come before our freedom of speech.”

The CCCC bills itself on Facebook as “an advocacy group comprised of men and women from all walks of life.”  That page shows about 3,000 followers.

A small group opposed to M-103 was opposed and shouted down by a much larger group in a counter demonstration.
A small group of a couple of hundred opposed to M-103 in Toronto was opposed and shouted down by a much larger group in a counter demonstration. © via CBC

The biggest demonstrations were in Toronto and in Montreal.  In almost all cases those opposed to M-103 were outnumbered by the counter demonstrators.  In Montreal about 150 opponents of the motion faced off with a larger group

In that case several scuffles occurred though no serious injuries.

Very few arrests were made at any of the demostrations.

Additional information-sources

Share
Categories: Immigration & Refugees, Politics, Society
Tags: , , , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

One comment on “Free speech or Islamophobia- Clashes in cities across Canada
  1. Avatar Ryan McCourt says:

    “Islamophobia” is a term frequently used to demonize critics of Islamic culture, and as such, the charge has been popularly, but improperly levelled at many former Muslims, Muslim reformers, and other peaceful, rational critics of religion.

    Religiously inspired hatred is as old as religion itself, and will continue to divide people so long as religious beliefs are held over and above secular ones. Rather than coddling and pandering to divisive religious identity politics, our government should be promoting secular values at every turn.

    I would be happy if our government made a daily motion opposing religious bigotry, ignorance, dishonesty, violence, discrimination, etc…. but have no interest in seeing our government use discriminatory, inflammatory, controversial terms like “Islamophobia” which, as noted, is often unthinkingly (or intentionally) used as a fallacious straw-man effigy to shut down debate.

    If the use and usefulness of the term cannot be rationally debated without such questioners automatically labelled as bigots, xenophobes, fascists, racists, etc. then that only further proves the point that the term itself is fatally compromised.

    No doubt, there are well meaning people on both sides of this issue that have good faith arguments to offer, but few such people were likely involved in these protests, and even fewer find themselves highlighted by the media, as controversy gets more clicks than rational argument, and fringe viewpoints always get more promotion than the logical middle ground ever does.