Lawyer Dennis Edney (L) and Omar Khadr (R). The Canadian Liberal government appears on the verge of paying a $10.5 million settlement and issue an apology for human rights violations to former Guatnanamo Bay prisoner Omar Khadr.

Lawyer Dennis Edney (L) and Omar Khadr (R). The Canadian Liberal government appears on the verge of paying a $10.5 million settlement and issue an apology for human rights violations to the former Guantanamo Bay prisoner Omar Khadr.
Photo Credit: ason Franson/Canadian Press

From accusation of terrorism, to multi-million dollar settlement

Share

Canadian government to pay Omar Khadr for years of abuse, rights violations.

It’s a long and tragic tale on many accounts, Omar Khadr is a Canadian citizen born in Toronto in 1986 but into a family closely associated with Islamic extremists.

At age 15, while the family was living in Afghanistan and associated with Osama bin Laden and the Taliban, he was involved in a battle against U.S. soldiers in which he was severely wounded but also accused of throwing a grenade killing one soldier and wounding another.

As a prisoner, he spent years in the U.S. Guantanamo Bay facility. Years later, he was transferred back to Canada, and later still released from a Canadian prison.  Along the way several lawsuits were filed, based on accusations of Canadian complicity in alleged torture and abuse while in U.S. custody.

The Supreme Court of Canada became involved, international law cited along with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,  and now the Canadian government is set to pay Khadr a compensation settlement of $10.5 million and offer an apology.

Sharry Aiken (LL.B, LL.M) is a professor of law at Queen’s University, Kingston Ontario, specializing in international law.

Listen
Sharry Aiken (L.B, LL.M) law professor Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont.
Sharry Aiken (L.B, LL.M) law professor Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont. © Queen’s U

The financial settlement and apology, widely believed to be announced in the immediate future, is dividing the country.

On one hand, many advocacy groups say Khadr, at age 15, was a child soldier and should never have been treated as an adult combatant. They say years of alleged abuse at the U.S. Guantanamo prison amounted to torture. The Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the Canadian government was complicit in that abuse, and that it failed in its duty to a Canadian citizen.  Advocates also say he was a child victim of his father’s extremist religious beliefs. His father was killed in an attack on insurgents by Pakistani forces in 2003.

“As held by this Court in Khadr 2008, Canada’s participation in the illegal process in place at Guantanamo Bay clearly violated Canada’s binding international obligations”. “The interrogation of a youth detained without access to counsel, to elicit statements about serious criminal charges while knowing that the youth had been subjected to sleep deprivation and while knowing that the fruits of the interrogations would be shared with the prosecutors, offends the most basic Canadian standards about the treatment of detained youth suspects.”  Supreme Court of Canada 2010.

Omar Khadr is shown in a Guantanamo Bay interrogation room in this image taken from a 2003 surveillance video.
Omar Khadr is shown in a Guantanamo Bay interrogation room in this image taken from a 2003 surveillance video. © Handout/Canadian Press

On the other side, many voices are saying the cash settlement is simply “rewarding a terrorist”.

After years of imprisonment at Guantanamo, Khadr admitted his guilt in the killing, but said later that it was under duress and that it was the only way he would be allowed out of the U.S. military prison and be transferred back to Canada. After two more years in a Canadian prison, he was finally released into the care of his lawyer.

Canadian Omar Khadr arrived at the U.S. detention centre in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in 2002, the year it opened. At 15, Khadr was its youngest detainee.
Canadian Omar Khadr arrived at the U.S. detention centre in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in 2002, the year it opened. At 15, Khadr was its youngest detainee. © (Reuters)

Subsequently a lawsuit for some $20 million dollars was filed by his lawyer claiming damages from the Canadian government.

The non-profit Canadian Taxpayers Federation advocacy group has started an online petition against the cash award, and former federal defence minister Jason Kenney tweeted that Khadr “should be in prison paying for his crimes, not profiting from them…”  Another tweet by the former Conservative Party minister said Khadr,  “….assembled and planted the same kind of bomb that IED’s that killed 97 Canadians…”
The U.S. had previously convicted Khadr of the crimes, and civil courts awarded the family of the killed soldier and the wounded soldier $130 million in damages against Khadr. Because the U.S. courts have no jurisdiction in Canada, their lawyers have launched a case in Canada and are insisting that any Canadian government financial settlement given to Khadr be diverted to them.

Omar Khadr confessed to killing a U.S. soldier in Afghanistan when he was 15. He made the admission during interrogations by the FBI and U.S. military investigators, some of which were later deemed ’oppressive.’ A government source confirmed Tuesday that Khadr will receive an apology and financial compensation for the conditions of his imprisonment.
Omar Khadr, now 30, has said he renounces violence and is studying to be a nurse. © (Terry Reith/CBC

It is not the first time the Canadian government awarded a damage settlement for rights abuses. In 2007, the government acknowledged its actions may have led to Canadian citizen Mahar Arar’s torture in a Syrian prison in 2002, and awarded him $10 million.

Three months ago the government agreed to compensate three other Canadian citizens, Abdullah Almalki, Ahmad Abou-Elmaati and Muayyed Nureddin, for actions by Canadian law enforcement and security officials that indirectly led to their torture in Syria and Egypt between 2001 and 2004.

After his release into the care of his lawyer Dennis Edney in 2016, Khadr apologized to his victims, adding that he rejected violence and wants to get on with an education.

He now resides in Edmonton where he is studying to be a nurse.

Additional information-

Share
Categories: Immigration & Refugees, International, Society
Tags: , , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

One comment on “From accusation of terrorism, to multi-million dollar settlement
  1. Avatar Rene Albert says:

    And I thought it was bad a year or so ago when the Federal Labour Board not only re-instated a Department of Transport employee for punching his boss in the face, plus they also awarded the puncher $25,000 in compensation.

    And now this…going from bad to worse! We got rid of Harper last election, and we sure as hell will have to get rid of Trudeau next election.