The issue of gun control will be an election issue this fall. Former members have criticised the federal governments civilian gun advisory committee, (Pat Sullivan- Associated Press)

Firearms: Liberal advisory committee under fire


In light of the ongoing and often heated debate about firearms use and ownership in Canada, in 2016 the Liberal government re-created a citizen committee with new members to advise the government on policy.  The Canadian Firearms Advisory Committee  (CFAC) had originally been created by the previous Conservative government.

The ten members (up to 15) on the committee would serve for two years as the government website says, in order “to provide advice to the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness on pragmatic measures to reform Canada’s firearms policies, laws and regulations to ensure a modernized firearms regime that will keep Canadians safe and safeguard their rights and freedoms in an open and democratic society”.

The committee met several times before the government introduced Bill C-71 to tighten firearms regulations.

Among other things the bill expands background checks from the current 5 year record, to a lifetime record. It also requires sellers to keep records for sales including long guns, and requires purchasers to present valid licences.  The latter is something that has long been done routinely anyway, whether in stores or private sales. Records for all restricted-class firearms have been kept since 1934.

“We’re just being used”. Former committee Chair Jack Major

Now a former chairman has himself spoken out against the committee. Retired Supreme Court judge Jack Major said this week that he had written twice to Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale early in his mandate about the need to hear witnesses and get expert testimony in order to provide informed advice, but received no reply.

Quoted in the Canadian Press he said that at the time he had written,  “If the committee’s going to be of any value, we have to get evidence”. He didn’t formally quit but said of his decision to not return after C-71 was introduced, “To simply be told what the government had done without any input from us, I felt, well, we’re just being used. You know, there’s a committee that’s not doing anything, but it looks pretty good on paper.”

Conservative Party public safety critic Pierre-Paul Hus, is quoted by the Canadian Press saying, “Their own members are saying the Trudeau Liberals are refusing to listen to witnesses and experts. This proves what Conservatives have been saying all along – the Liberals’ approach to firearms is based solely around politics and not evidence”.

That sentiment was echoed by Tracey Wilson of the firearms advocacy group, Canadian Coalition for Firearms Rights (CCFR) who said of the Liberal revamped FCAC, “I think this was a missed opportunity for the Liberals to have real advisors on a very complex problem. It appears that most of the appointments were more or less appeasements and none of them were really consulted when crafting policy. This is clear evidence that the Liberals didn’t plan to do what’s best for public safety, but rather use the members of CFAC to hide behind with their hurried and sloppy legislation”.

Criticism has also this week come from another source also on the committee, vice-chair Natalie Provost who suddenly resigned this week.

She survived being shot in the Polytechnique University shootings in which 14 women were killed in December 1989, and has a longtime association with the gun-control lobby group, PolySeSouvient (Poly remembers).

Shooting survivor Natalie Provost, shown here in 2014, was later appointed by the Liberals as Vice-Chair of the Firearms Advisory Committee. She quit this week over what see says is a lack of federal action on gun control (Graham Hughes- CP)

In  her resignation letter she said the government has failed to take strong enough action on firearms, especially ignoring her calls to reclassify modern sport rifles often labelled as “assault-style” rifles.

Tony Bernardo of the firearms advocacy group Canadian Shooting Sports Association was a former member of the committee before it was revamped in by the new Liberal government. He said the committee was originally created to provide advice, not direction, to the government. Of the resignation of Ms Provost he said, it would appear she misunderstood the role, adding the resignation seemed be an “indication her interest in the committee was to push the gun-ban agenda she has advocated for so many years, not to provide clarity to the Minister’s decision-making process”.

Seven replacement members were added by the federal Liberals in 2017.  Two new members were added to the committee in February this year, Wally Oppal, a lawyer, former judge and former politician is the Chair,  Christine Creyke is a member of Canada’s Indigenous community and is the Lands Director for the Tahltan Central Government.

Taking over as Vice-Chair was Lynda Kiejko, a civil engineer who has competed internationally in air-pistol.

Additional information-sources

Categories: Politics, Society
Tags: , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available